Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33147 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to reflect upon the theoretical and methodological implications for field research under the perspectives of the dialogic approach to language (BAKHTIN, 2003) and of the ergologic approach (SCHWARTZ, 1997). These discussions were triggered by researches which, though extremely diverse in terms of the objects investigated, had in common, besides the theoretical framework, the fact that field research was always involved. We start from the theoretical assumption that objectivity in research is impossible, since the silencing of the voices brought in by the researcher is not feasible. In what concerns language studies in work situation, it is essential the establishment of a dialog between the worker of the concepts (i.e., the researcher) and the workers of the activities which are being analyzed. Thus, the choices are negotiated among all the participants of the dialogic community which has been created (FRANÇA, 2002). |
id |
UFF-6_d4e618c9c6338efd5d4c442ca6d574cf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33147 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on workDiálogos em campo: uma co-construção de saberes sobre o trabalhoField research. Dialogism. ErgologyPesquisa de campo. Dialogismo. ErgologiaThe aim of this paper is to reflect upon the theoretical and methodological implications for field research under the perspectives of the dialogic approach to language (BAKHTIN, 2003) and of the ergologic approach (SCHWARTZ, 1997). These discussions were triggered by researches which, though extremely diverse in terms of the objects investigated, had in common, besides the theoretical framework, the fact that field research was always involved. We start from the theoretical assumption that objectivity in research is impossible, since the silencing of the voices brought in by the researcher is not feasible. In what concerns language studies in work situation, it is essential the establishment of a dialog between the worker of the concepts (i.e., the researcher) and the workers of the activities which are being analyzed. Thus, the choices are negotiated among all the participants of the dialogic community which has been created (FRANÇA, 2002).O objetivo deste artigo é propor algumas reflexões acerca das implicações teórico-metodológicas da pesquisa de campo sob a perspectiva da concepção dialógica de linguagem (BAKHTIN, 2003) e da abordagem ergológica da atividade (SCHWARTZ, 1997). São discussões nascidas em pesquisas que, apesar de possuírem objetos muito diferentes, têm em comum, além do marco teórico, a pesquisa de campo. Partimos do pressuposto teórico de que é impossível a objetividade na pesquisa, já que o apagamento das vozes trazidas pelo pesquisador é inexeqüível. No que diz respeito aos estudos de linguagem em situação de trabalho, faz-se imprescindível a instauração de um diálogo entre o trabalhador dos conceitos – o pesquisador – e os trabalhadores das atividades analisadas. As escolhas, portanto, passam por uma negociação entre todos os participantes da comunidade dialógica formada (FRANÇA, 2002).Universidade Federal Fluminense2008-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33147Gragoatá; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2008): Cross-disciplinarityGragoatá; v. 13 n. 25 (2008): Transdisciplinaridades2358-41141413-9073reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33147/19134Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVargens, Dayala Paiva de MedeirosFreitas, Luciana Maria Almeida deBarreto, Talita de Assis2020-08-18T23:35:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33147Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2020-08-18T23:35:22Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work Diálogos em campo: uma co-construção de saberes sobre o trabalho |
title |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work |
spellingShingle |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work Vargens, Dayala Paiva de Medeiros Field research. Dialogism. Ergology Pesquisa de campo. Dialogismo. Ergologia |
title_short |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work |
title_full |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work |
title_fullStr |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work |
title_sort |
Dialogues in field research: a knowledge co-construction on work |
author |
Vargens, Dayala Paiva de Medeiros |
author_facet |
Vargens, Dayala Paiva de Medeiros Freitas, Luciana Maria Almeida de Barreto, Talita de Assis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas, Luciana Maria Almeida de Barreto, Talita de Assis |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vargens, Dayala Paiva de Medeiros Freitas, Luciana Maria Almeida de Barreto, Talita de Assis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Field research. Dialogism. Ergology Pesquisa de campo. Dialogismo. Ergologia |
topic |
Field research. Dialogism. Ergology Pesquisa de campo. Dialogismo. Ergologia |
description |
The aim of this paper is to reflect upon the theoretical and methodological implications for field research under the perspectives of the dialogic approach to language (BAKHTIN, 2003) and of the ergologic approach (SCHWARTZ, 1997). These discussions were triggered by researches which, though extremely diverse in terms of the objects investigated, had in common, besides the theoretical framework, the fact that field research was always involved. We start from the theoretical assumption that objectivity in research is impossible, since the silencing of the voices brought in by the researcher is not feasible. In what concerns language studies in work situation, it is essential the establishment of a dialog between the worker of the concepts (i.e., the researcher) and the workers of the activities which are being analyzed. Thus, the choices are negotiated among all the participants of the dialogic community which has been created (FRANÇA, 2002). |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33147 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33147 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33147/19134 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2008): Cross-disciplinarity Gragoatá; v. 13 n. 25 (2008): Transdisciplinaridades 2358-4114 1413-9073 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705500564062208 |