Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33035 |
Resumo: | This paper presents a discourse analysis of declarations and resolutions issued by the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP), in order to identify features of language policies for the promotion and dissemination of Portuguese, widespread in the last decade. We start with the idea of ethos and polemic (MAINGUENEAU, [1984] 2007) to identify four positions/ enunciators, which are: the patriotic-boastful, the defender, the apprehensive and the idealistic-reliever. In statements analyzed, we found that these different images of themselves construct an apparent idea of linguistic homogeneity, which aims to overcome the heterogeneity of the CPLP. Thus, polemics are silenced and we note that is under construction a new sense of the Portuguese language, with homogenizing force in opposition to one already in progress, which is based on the social and historical process of grammatisation and heterogenization of the national Portugueses languages. |
id |
UFF-6_f528f89826e38ed48412d3290afbf7a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33035 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPumentsFabrica-se um “novo português”? Uma análise discursiva de documentos da CPLPlanguage policyCPLPpromote the Portuguese languageethospolemicpolítica linguísticaCPLPpromoção da língua portuguesaetospolêmicaThis paper presents a discourse analysis of declarations and resolutions issued by the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP), in order to identify features of language policies for the promotion and dissemination of Portuguese, widespread in the last decade. We start with the idea of ethos and polemic (MAINGUENEAU, [1984] 2007) to identify four positions/ enunciators, which are: the patriotic-boastful, the defender, the apprehensive and the idealistic-reliever. In statements analyzed, we found that these different images of themselves construct an apparent idea of linguistic homogeneity, which aims to overcome the heterogeneity of the CPLP. Thus, polemics are silenced and we note that is under construction a new sense of the Portuguese language, with homogenizing force in opposition to one already in progress, which is based on the social and historical process of grammatisation and heterogenization of the national Portugueses languages.Este trabalho expõe uma análise discursiva de declarações e resoluções emitidas pela Comunidade dos Países de Língua Portuguesa (CPLP), com o propósito de identificar traços das políticas linguísticas para a promoção e difusão do português, difundidas nesta última década. Partimos da ideia de etos e polêmica (MAINGUENEAU, [1984] 2007) para identificar perfis de enunciadores, quais sejam: ufanista, defensor, apreensivo e idealista-apaziguador. Nos enunciados analisados, constatamos que essas diferentes imagens de si constroem uma aparente ideia de homogeneidade linguística, que tem como objetivo superar a heterogeneidade fundante da própria CPLP. Desse modo, polêmicas são silenciadas e podemos notar que está em construção um novo sentido de língua portuguesa, com força homogeneizante em contraposição a outro já em curso, que tem como base o processo social e histórico de gramatização e heterogeneização das línguas portuguesas nacionais.Universidade Federal Fluminense2012-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3303510.22409/gragoata.2012n32a33035Gragoatá; Vol. 17 No. 32 (2012): Language PoliciesGragoatá; v. 17 n. 32 (2012): Políticas linguísticas2358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v17i32reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33035/19022Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSant'Anna, Vera Lucia de AlbuquerqueSilva, Diego Barbosa da2019-08-23T10:57:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33035Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2019-08-23T10:57:23Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments Fabrica-se um “novo português”? Uma análise discursiva de documentos da CPLP |
title |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments |
spellingShingle |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments Sant'Anna, Vera Lucia de Albuquerque language policy CPLP promote the Portuguese language ethos polemic política linguística CPLP promoção da língua portuguesa etos polêmica |
title_short |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments |
title_full |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments |
title_fullStr |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments |
title_sort |
Is a “new portuguese” being produced? A discourse analysis of documents issued by the CPLPuments |
author |
Sant'Anna, Vera Lucia de Albuquerque |
author_facet |
Sant'Anna, Vera Lucia de Albuquerque Silva, Diego Barbosa da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Diego Barbosa da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sant'Anna, Vera Lucia de Albuquerque Silva, Diego Barbosa da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
language policy CPLP promote the Portuguese language ethos polemic política linguística CPLP promoção da língua portuguesa etos polêmica |
topic |
language policy CPLP promote the Portuguese language ethos polemic política linguística CPLP promoção da língua portuguesa etos polêmica |
description |
This paper presents a discourse analysis of declarations and resolutions issued by the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP), in order to identify features of language policies for the promotion and dissemination of Portuguese, widespread in the last decade. We start with the idea of ethos and polemic (MAINGUENEAU, [1984] 2007) to identify four positions/ enunciators, which are: the patriotic-boastful, the defender, the apprehensive and the idealistic-reliever. In statements analyzed, we found that these different images of themselves construct an apparent idea of linguistic homogeneity, which aims to overcome the heterogeneity of the CPLP. Thus, polemics are silenced and we note that is under construction a new sense of the Portuguese language, with homogenizing force in opposition to one already in progress, which is based on the social and historical process of grammatisation and heterogenization of the national Portugueses languages. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33035 10.22409/gragoata.2012n32a33035 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33035 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.2012n32a33035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33035/19022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 17 No. 32 (2012): Language Policies Gragoatá; v. 17 n. 32 (2012): Políticas linguísticas 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v17i32 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705500154068992 |