Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viaro, Renee Volpato
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Guirado, Marlene, Albanese, Luciana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135
Resumo: This research discusses the subjective effects experienced by the psychoanalyst in the process of psychoanalytical formation; intended, therefore, to investigate possible modes of subjectivity in the discourses about this process. For this, have been interviewed six psychoanalysts: three Lacanian and three linked to International Psychoanalytical Association – IPA; the interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Institutional Discourse Analysis. It was possible to delineate how respondents linked to IPA subjective themselves  through a reaffirmation of the trainer discourse, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the observance of the IPA’s training model; and the Lacanians through a contraposition to other discourses, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the differentiation to the terms associated with IPA, philosophy, psychology, etc. Still among the results, the personal analysis appeared, in both groups, as the most important production device of the psychoanalyst: a relationship that produces truths and knowledge of self in which respondents find conditions and limitations to recognize themselves as psychoanalysts.
id UFF-7_04f4df69e60c975a2652395cd651cffe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5135
network_acronym_str UFF-7
network_name_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysisSubjetivação na Formação em Psicanálise: uma análise institucional de discursomodes of subjectivitypsychoanalytical formationdiscourseinstitutional discourse analysissubjection-resistancemodos de subjetivaçãoformação psicanalíticadiscursoanálise institucional do discursoassujeitamento-resistênciaPsicologiaThis research discusses the subjective effects experienced by the psychoanalyst in the process of psychoanalytical formation; intended, therefore, to investigate possible modes of subjectivity in the discourses about this process. For this, have been interviewed six psychoanalysts: three Lacanian and three linked to International Psychoanalytical Association – IPA; the interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Institutional Discourse Analysis. It was possible to delineate how respondents linked to IPA subjective themselves  through a reaffirmation of the trainer discourse, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the observance of the IPA’s training model; and the Lacanians through a contraposition to other discourses, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the differentiation to the terms associated with IPA, philosophy, psychology, etc. Still among the results, the personal analysis appeared, in both groups, as the most important production device of the psychoanalyst: a relationship that produces truths and knowledge of self in which respondents find conditions and limitations to recognize themselves as psychoanalysts.Esta pesquisa problematiza os efeitos subjetivos experienciados pelo psicanalista no processo de formação em psicanálise; visando, portanto, a investigar possíveis modos de subjetivação nos discursos sobre este processo. Para isso, foram entrevistados seis psicanalistas: três lacanianos e três vinculados à Associação Internacional de Psicanálise – IPA; as entrevistas foram transcritas e analisadas segundo a metodologia da Análise Institucional do Discurso. Pôde-se delinear como os entrevistados vinculados à IPA subjetivam-se através de uma reafirmação do discurso formador, reconhecendo-se psicanalistas na/pela observância ao modelo de formação da IPA; e os lacanianos através de uma contraposição a outros discursos, reconhecendo-se psicanalistas na/pela diferenciação a termos associados à IPA, à filosofia, à psicologia, etc. Ainda dentre os resultados, a análise pessoal figura, em ambos os grupos, como dispositivo central de produção do psicanalista: uma relação produtora de verdades e saberes de si nos quais os entrevistados encontram condições e limites para se reconhecerem psicanalistas.ABEC2016-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliador por ParesAnálise de discurso e entrevistasapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2016); 275-284Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 28 n. 2 (2016); 275-2841984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135/4988Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessViaro, Renee VolpatoGuirado, MarleneAlbanese, Luciana2018-06-05T12:16:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5135Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:16:11Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
Subjetivação na Formação em Psicanálise: uma análise institucional de discurso
title Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
spellingShingle Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
Viaro, Renee Volpato
modes of subjectivity
psychoanalytical formation
discourse
institutional discourse analysis
subjection-resistance
modos de subjetivação
formação psicanalítica
discurso
análise institucional do discurso
assujeitamento-resistência
Psicologia
title_short Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
title_full Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
title_fullStr Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
title_full_unstemmed Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
title_sort Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
author Viaro, Renee Volpato
author_facet Viaro, Renee Volpato
Guirado, Marlene
Albanese, Luciana
author_role author
author2 Guirado, Marlene
Albanese, Luciana
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viaro, Renee Volpato
Guirado, Marlene
Albanese, Luciana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv modes of subjectivity
psychoanalytical formation
discourse
institutional discourse analysis
subjection-resistance
modos de subjetivação
formação psicanalítica
discurso
análise institucional do discurso
assujeitamento-resistência
Psicologia
topic modes of subjectivity
psychoanalytical formation
discourse
institutional discourse analysis
subjection-resistance
modos de subjetivação
formação psicanalítica
discurso
análise institucional do discurso
assujeitamento-resistência
Psicologia
description This research discusses the subjective effects experienced by the psychoanalyst in the process of psychoanalytical formation; intended, therefore, to investigate possible modes of subjectivity in the discourses about this process. For this, have been interviewed six psychoanalysts: three Lacanian and three linked to International Psychoanalytical Association – IPA; the interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Institutional Discourse Analysis. It was possible to delineate how respondents linked to IPA subjective themselves  through a reaffirmation of the trainer discourse, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the observance of the IPA’s training model; and the Lacanians through a contraposition to other discourses, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the differentiation to the terms associated with IPA, philosophy, psychology, etc. Still among the results, the personal analysis appeared, in both groups, as the most important production device of the psychoanalyst: a relationship that produces truths and knowledge of self in which respondents find conditions and limitations to recognize themselves as psychoanalysts.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliador por Pares
Análise de discurso e entrevistas
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135
url https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135/4988
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2016); 275-284
Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 28 n. 2 (2016); 275-284
1984-0292
reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
collection Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com
_version_ 1799695291415265280