Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135 |
Resumo: | This research discusses the subjective effects experienced by the psychoanalyst in the process of psychoanalytical formation; intended, therefore, to investigate possible modes of subjectivity in the discourses about this process. For this, have been interviewed six psychoanalysts: three Lacanian and three linked to International Psychoanalytical Association – IPA; the interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Institutional Discourse Analysis. It was possible to delineate how respondents linked to IPA subjective themselves through a reaffirmation of the trainer discourse, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the observance of the IPA’s training model; and the Lacanians through a contraposition to other discourses, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the differentiation to the terms associated with IPA, philosophy, psychology, etc. Still among the results, the personal analysis appeared, in both groups, as the most important production device of the psychoanalyst: a relationship that produces truths and knowledge of self in which respondents find conditions and limitations to recognize themselves as psychoanalysts. |
id |
UFF-7_04f4df69e60c975a2652395cd651cffe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5135 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-7 |
network_name_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysisSubjetivação na Formação em Psicanálise: uma análise institucional de discursomodes of subjectivitypsychoanalytical formationdiscourseinstitutional discourse analysissubjection-resistancemodos de subjetivaçãoformação psicanalíticadiscursoanálise institucional do discursoassujeitamento-resistênciaPsicologiaThis research discusses the subjective effects experienced by the psychoanalyst in the process of psychoanalytical formation; intended, therefore, to investigate possible modes of subjectivity in the discourses about this process. For this, have been interviewed six psychoanalysts: three Lacanian and three linked to International Psychoanalytical Association – IPA; the interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Institutional Discourse Analysis. It was possible to delineate how respondents linked to IPA subjective themselves through a reaffirmation of the trainer discourse, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the observance of the IPA’s training model; and the Lacanians through a contraposition to other discourses, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the differentiation to the terms associated with IPA, philosophy, psychology, etc. Still among the results, the personal analysis appeared, in both groups, as the most important production device of the psychoanalyst: a relationship that produces truths and knowledge of self in which respondents find conditions and limitations to recognize themselves as psychoanalysts.Esta pesquisa problematiza os efeitos subjetivos experienciados pelo psicanalista no processo de formação em psicanálise; visando, portanto, a investigar possíveis modos de subjetivação nos discursos sobre este processo. Para isso, foram entrevistados seis psicanalistas: três lacanianos e três vinculados à Associação Internacional de Psicanálise – IPA; as entrevistas foram transcritas e analisadas segundo a metodologia da Análise Institucional do Discurso. Pôde-se delinear como os entrevistados vinculados à IPA subjetivam-se através de uma reafirmação do discurso formador, reconhecendo-se psicanalistas na/pela observância ao modelo de formação da IPA; e os lacanianos através de uma contraposição a outros discursos, reconhecendo-se psicanalistas na/pela diferenciação a termos associados à IPA, à filosofia, à psicologia, etc. Ainda dentre os resultados, a análise pessoal figura, em ambos os grupos, como dispositivo central de produção do psicanalista: uma relação produtora de verdades e saberes de si nos quais os entrevistados encontram condições e limites para se reconhecerem psicanalistas.ABEC2016-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliador por ParesAnálise de discurso e entrevistasapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2016); 275-284Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 28 n. 2 (2016); 275-2841984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135/4988Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessViaro, Renee VolpatoGuirado, MarleneAlbanese, Luciana2018-06-05T12:16:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5135Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:16:11Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis Subjetivação na Formação em Psicanálise: uma análise institucional de discurso |
title |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis |
spellingShingle |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis Viaro, Renee Volpato modes of subjectivity psychoanalytical formation discourse institutional discourse analysis subjection-resistance modos de subjetivação formação psicanalítica discurso análise institucional do discurso assujeitamento-resistência Psicologia |
title_short |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis |
title_full |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis |
title_fullStr |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis |
title_sort |
Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic formation: an institutional discourse analysis |
author |
Viaro, Renee Volpato |
author_facet |
Viaro, Renee Volpato Guirado, Marlene Albanese, Luciana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guirado, Marlene Albanese, Luciana |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Viaro, Renee Volpato Guirado, Marlene Albanese, Luciana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
modes of subjectivity psychoanalytical formation discourse institutional discourse analysis subjection-resistance modos de subjetivação formação psicanalítica discurso análise institucional do discurso assujeitamento-resistência Psicologia |
topic |
modes of subjectivity psychoanalytical formation discourse institutional discourse analysis subjection-resistance modos de subjetivação formação psicanalítica discurso análise institucional do discurso assujeitamento-resistência Psicologia |
description |
This research discusses the subjective effects experienced by the psychoanalyst in the process of psychoanalytical formation; intended, therefore, to investigate possible modes of subjectivity in the discourses about this process. For this, have been interviewed six psychoanalysts: three Lacanian and three linked to International Psychoanalytical Association – IPA; the interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Institutional Discourse Analysis. It was possible to delineate how respondents linked to IPA subjective themselves through a reaffirmation of the trainer discourse, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the observance of the IPA’s training model; and the Lacanians through a contraposition to other discourses, recognizing up as psychoanalysts by the differentiation to the terms associated with IPA, philosophy, psychology, etc. Still among the results, the personal analysis appeared, in both groups, as the most important production device of the psychoanalyst: a relationship that produces truths and knowledge of self in which respondents find conditions and limitations to recognize themselves as psychoanalysts. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliador por Pares Análise de discurso e entrevistas |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5135/4988 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2016); 275-284 Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 28 n. 2 (2016); 275-284 1984-0292 reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
collection |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799695291415265280 |