From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wendling, Michelle Menezes
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Coelho, Daniel Menezes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5107
Resumo: In the Seminar of ethics, Lacan has opposed the analytical pastoral and the “do not give away on your desire” ethics. By putting the desire as a parameter, such an ethics questions the universal values to achieve a supposed good life. Here we compare this formulation to the ethics of the “benedictory of desire”, highlighted by Lacan in Television. If in the 7th Seminar we have a critics about the ideal of happiness, associated to the market of the goods, on the “benedictoty of desire” ethics happiness appears only as a symptom, tied to the different modes of enjoyment, which is a possible way to question about the contemporary injunction  to enjoy, bound to a certain “high performance” culture.
id UFF-7_8ac2e47822d690d9ea2de368b2a6e307
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5107
network_acronym_str UFF-7
network_name_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to LacanDo “não ceder de seu desejo” ao “bem-dizer o desejo”: considerações acerca da ética em LacandesireethicshappinessenjoymentmoraledesejoéticafelicidadegozomoralHistóriaTeorias e Sistemas em PsicologiaIn the Seminar of ethics, Lacan has opposed the analytical pastoral and the “do not give away on your desire” ethics. By putting the desire as a parameter, such an ethics questions the universal values to achieve a supposed good life. Here we compare this formulation to the ethics of the “benedictory of desire”, highlighted by Lacan in Television. If in the 7th Seminar we have a critics about the ideal of happiness, associated to the market of the goods, on the “benedictoty of desire” ethics happiness appears only as a symptom, tied to the different modes of enjoyment, which is a possible way to question about the contemporary injunction  to enjoy, bound to a certain “high performance” culture.No Seminário da ética, Lacan opôs a pastoral analítica à ética do “não ceder de seu desejo”. Ao pôr o desejo como parâmetro, tal ética questiona valores universais para alcançar uma suposta boa vida. Comparamos tal formulação à ética do “bem-dizer o desejo”, destacada por Lacan em Televisão. Se no Seminário 7 temos uma crítica aos ideais de felicidade associados ao mercado dos bens, na ética do “bem-dizer o desejo”, a felicidade aparece como parte do sintoma, vinculada aos diferentes modos de gozo, via possível para questionar a atual injunção a aproveitar, vinculada a uma certa cultura da alta performance.ABEC2016-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresRevisão de Literaturaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5107Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2016); 139-145Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 28 n. 1 (2016); 139-1451984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5107/4958Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWendling, Michelle MenezesCoelho, Daniel Menezes2018-06-05T12:08:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5107Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:08:25Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
Do “não ceder de seu desejo” ao “bem-dizer o desejo”: considerações acerca da ética em Lacan
title From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
spellingShingle From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
Wendling, Michelle Menezes
desire
ethics
happiness
enjoyment
morale
desejo
ética
felicidade
gozo
moral
História
Teorias e Sistemas em Psicologia
title_short From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
title_full From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
title_fullStr From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
title_full_unstemmed From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
title_sort From “do not give away on your desire” to “benedictory of the desire”: considerations about the ethics to Lacan
author Wendling, Michelle Menezes
author_facet Wendling, Michelle Menezes
Coelho, Daniel Menezes
author_role author
author2 Coelho, Daniel Menezes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wendling, Michelle Menezes
Coelho, Daniel Menezes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv desire
ethics
happiness
enjoyment
morale
desejo
ética
felicidade
gozo
moral
História
Teorias e Sistemas em Psicologia
topic desire
ethics
happiness
enjoyment
morale
desejo
ética
felicidade
gozo
moral
História
Teorias e Sistemas em Psicologia
description In the Seminar of ethics, Lacan has opposed the analytical pastoral and the “do not give away on your desire” ethics. By putting the desire as a parameter, such an ethics questions the universal values to achieve a supposed good life. Here we compare this formulation to the ethics of the “benedictory of desire”, highlighted by Lacan in Television. If in the 7th Seminar we have a critics about the ideal of happiness, associated to the market of the goods, on the “benedictoty of desire” ethics happiness appears only as a symptom, tied to the different modes of enjoyment, which is a possible way to question about the contemporary injunction  to enjoy, bound to a certain “high performance” culture.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
Revisão de Literatura
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5107
url https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5107
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/5107/4958
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2016); 139-145
Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 28 n. 1 (2016); 139-145
1984-0292
reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
collection Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com
_version_ 1799695291367030784