A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Teoria da História |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/55714 |
Resumo: | This article takes as its starting point the development of intellectual history in the 20th century, paying special attention to the changes proposed by Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck. In this way, context and historical process are analytical keys that emerge as primordial for overcoming ideas as essences. Then, it is emphasized the expansion of theoretical possibilities in intellectual history with the problematization of the contexts of reception of ideas. The argument develops in the sense of postulating that some of the important current concepts - among them that of elective traditions - maintain that the problematization of the researcher's context can be seen in the light of the notions of context and process. The proposal developed in the article is based on these perspectives, in order to postulate that the theoretical and conceptual references used by researchers are prolific for a dense problematization about historiographic studies. In this sense, the researcher's subjectivity is considered to be productive and interconnected to a network of theoretical and conceptual references. The conclusion is that the final product - historiographical work - is not only the result of epistemological keys, but also contemplates the way in which the historian is inserted in the intellectual debates of his field of study. |
id |
UFG-10_c667a6f26a5e6051bc63aa2a52d7b37d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/55714 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Teoria da História |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studiesUm diálogo produtivo entre a nova história intelectual e os estudos historiográficosHistória intelectualHistoriografiaTeoria e metodologia da história.Intellectual historyHistoriographyTheory and methodology of historyThis article takes as its starting point the development of intellectual history in the 20th century, paying special attention to the changes proposed by Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck. In this way, context and historical process are analytical keys that emerge as primordial for overcoming ideas as essences. Then, it is emphasized the expansion of theoretical possibilities in intellectual history with the problematization of the contexts of reception of ideas. The argument develops in the sense of postulating that some of the important current concepts - among them that of elective traditions - maintain that the problematization of the researcher's context can be seen in the light of the notions of context and process. The proposal developed in the article is based on these perspectives, in order to postulate that the theoretical and conceptual references used by researchers are prolific for a dense problematization about historiographic studies. In this sense, the researcher's subjectivity is considered to be productive and interconnected to a network of theoretical and conceptual references. The conclusion is that the final product - historiographical work - is not only the result of epistemological keys, but also contemplates the way in which the historian is inserted in the intellectual debates of his field of study.Este artigo tem como ponto de partida o desenvolvimento da história intelectual no século XX, fornecendo especial atenção às mudanças propostas por Quentin Skinner e Reinhart Koselleck. Nesse percurso, contexto e processo histórico são elementos que emergem como primordiais para a superação das ideias como essências. Salienta-se, em seguida, a ampliação das possibilidades teóricas na história intelectual com a problematização dos contextos de recepção das ideias. O argumento se desenvolve no sentido de postular que alguns dos importantes conceitos atuais – dentre os quais o de tradições eletivas – sustentam que a problematização do contexto do pesquisador pode ser visto sob a luz das noções de contexto e processo. A proposta desenvolvida no artigo lastreia-se nessas perspectivas para postular que os referenciais teóricos e conceituais dos pesquisadores são prolíficos para uma problematização densa no campo da historiografia. Nesse sentido, a subjetividade do pesquisador é considerada como produtiva e interconectada a uma rede de referências teóricas e conceituais. A conclusão é que o produto final – o trabalho historiográfico – não é resultado somente de chaves epistemológicas, mas também contempla o modo como o historiador se insere no seu campo.Universidade Federal de Goiás2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/5571410.5216/rth.v24i1.55714Revista de Teoria da História; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021): Philosophies of history; 194 - 212Revista de Teoria da História; v. 24 n. 1 (2021): Filosofias da história; 194 - 2122175-5892reponame:Revista de Teoria da Históriainstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/55714/36980Copyright (c) 2021 rth |https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPalermo, Luis Claudio2021-07-30T20:45:54Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/55714Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/PUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/oai||revistateoriadahistoria@hotmail.com2175-58922175-5892opendoar:2021-07-30T20:45:54Revista de Teoria da História - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies Um diálogo produtivo entre a nova história intelectual e os estudos historiográficos |
title |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies |
spellingShingle |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies Palermo, Luis Claudio História intelectual Historiografia Teoria e metodologia da história. Intellectual history Historiography Theory and methodology of history |
title_short |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies |
title_full |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies |
title_fullStr |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies |
title_sort |
A productive dialogue between the new intellectual history and historiographic studies |
author |
Palermo, Luis Claudio |
author_facet |
Palermo, Luis Claudio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Palermo, Luis Claudio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
História intelectual Historiografia Teoria e metodologia da história. Intellectual history Historiography Theory and methodology of history |
topic |
História intelectual Historiografia Teoria e metodologia da história. Intellectual history Historiography Theory and methodology of history |
description |
This article takes as its starting point the development of intellectual history in the 20th century, paying special attention to the changes proposed by Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck. In this way, context and historical process are analytical keys that emerge as primordial for overcoming ideas as essences. Then, it is emphasized the expansion of theoretical possibilities in intellectual history with the problematization of the contexts of reception of ideas. The argument develops in the sense of postulating that some of the important current concepts - among them that of elective traditions - maintain that the problematization of the researcher's context can be seen in the light of the notions of context and process. The proposal developed in the article is based on these perspectives, in order to postulate that the theoretical and conceptual references used by researchers are prolific for a dense problematization about historiographic studies. In this sense, the researcher's subjectivity is considered to be productive and interconnected to a network of theoretical and conceptual references. The conclusion is that the final product - historiographical work - is not only the result of epistemological keys, but also contemplates the way in which the historian is inserted in the intellectual debates of his field of study. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/55714 10.5216/rth.v24i1.55714 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/55714 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/rth.v24i1.55714 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/55714/36980 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 rth | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 rth | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teoria da História; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021): Philosophies of history; 194 - 212 Revista de Teoria da História; v. 24 n. 1 (2021): Filosofias da história; 194 - 212 2175-5892 reponame:Revista de Teoria da História instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista de Teoria da História |
collection |
Revista de Teoria da História |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teoria da História - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistateoriadahistoria@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1809730281986326528 |