Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cristina Garbuio, Danielle
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Mara Zamarioli, Cristina, Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália, Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza, Carvalho, Emília Campos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425
Resumo: The assessment of wounds in patients requires the selection of appropriate tools; however, it may be difficult to select the tool that is best suited to each case as each tool has a different set of parameters. This study aimed to identify the tools, and their respective parameters, that are used for evaluating wound healing. This integrative review was carried out using the following databasesLiteratura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, CumulativeIndex to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.Thirty-five studies were considered; the most commonly used instrument was PUSH, followed by BWAT, DESIGN and DESIGN-R. The most frequently assessed components were size (area, volume, depth), exudate, tissue type, and signs of infection or inflammation. The tools revealed the complexity of both the process and the evaluation of healing. Thus, the study contributes to ensuring the selection of the best tool for each individual case.
id UFG-13_af3aa5667d12a536e8e4191cb0cb8ee7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/49425
network_acronym_str UFG-13
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative reviewInstrumentos para avaliação da cicatrização de lesões de pele: revisão integrativaThe assessment of wounds in patients requires the selection of appropriate tools; however, it may be difficult to select the tool that is best suited to each case as each tool has a different set of parameters. This study aimed to identify the tools, and their respective parameters, that are used for evaluating wound healing. This integrative review was carried out using the following databasesLiteratura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, CumulativeIndex to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.Thirty-five studies were considered; the most commonly used instrument was PUSH, followed by BWAT, DESIGN and DESIGN-R. The most frequently assessed components were size (area, volume, depth), exudate, tissue type, and signs of infection or inflammation. The tools revealed the complexity of both the process and the evaluation of healing. Thus, the study contributes to ensuring the selection of the best tool for each individual case.A avaliação dos pacientes com feridas embasa a seleção de intervenções apropriadas; no entanto, a existência de instrumentos com diferentes parâmetros pode dificultar a escolha daquele mais adequado a cada necessidade. O objetivo do estudo foi identificarinstrumentos utilizados e seus respectivos parâmetros para avaliação do processo de cicatrização. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa, realizada nas bases de dados Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Cumulattive Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literarure, PubMed, Web of Science e Scopus. Foram considerados 35 estudos; o instrumento mais utilizado foi o PUSH, seguido da BWAT, DESING e DESIGN-R. As características mais avaliadas foram tamanho (área, volume, profundidade), exsudato, tipo de tecido, sinais de infecção ou inflamação. Os instrumentos evidenciaram a complexidade do processo de cicatrização e de sua avaliação, assim, o estudo contribui para embasar a escolha do melhor instrumento para cada necessidade.Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG2018-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/4942510.5216/ree.v20.49425Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 20 (2018); v20a40Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 20 (2018); v20a401518-1944reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermageminstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32640https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32641Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCristina Garbuio, DanielleMara Zamarioli, CristinaChantal Magalhães da Silva, NatáliaOliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de SouzaCarvalho, Emília Campos2022-05-24T20:39:49Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/49425Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/fenPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/oairee.fen@ufg.br1518-19441518-1944opendoar:2022-05-24T20:39:49Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
Instrumentos para avaliação da cicatrização de lesões de pele: revisão integrativa
title Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
spellingShingle Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
Cristina Garbuio, Danielle
title_short Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
title_full Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
title_fullStr Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
title_sort Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
author Cristina Garbuio, Danielle
author_facet Cristina Garbuio, Danielle
Mara Zamarioli, Cristina
Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália
Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza
Carvalho, Emília Campos
author_role author
author2 Mara Zamarioli, Cristina
Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália
Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza
Carvalho, Emília Campos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cristina Garbuio, Danielle
Mara Zamarioli, Cristina
Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália
Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza
Carvalho, Emília Campos
description The assessment of wounds in patients requires the selection of appropriate tools; however, it may be difficult to select the tool that is best suited to each case as each tool has a different set of parameters. This study aimed to identify the tools, and their respective parameters, that are used for evaluating wound healing. This integrative review was carried out using the following databasesLiteratura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, CumulativeIndex to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.Thirty-five studies were considered; the most commonly used instrument was PUSH, followed by BWAT, DESIGN and DESIGN-R. The most frequently assessed components were size (area, volume, depth), exudate, tissue type, and signs of infection or inflammation. The tools revealed the complexity of both the process and the evaluation of healing. Thus, the study contributes to ensuring the selection of the best tool for each individual case.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425
10.5216/ree.v20.49425
url https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/ree.v20.49425
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32640
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32641
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 20 (2018); v20a40
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 20 (2018); v20a40
1518-1944
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
collection Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ree.fen@ufg.br
_version_ 1797049171624067072

Registros relacionados