Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425 |
Resumo: | The assessment of wounds in patients requires the selection of appropriate tools; however, it may be difficult to select the tool that is best suited to each case as each tool has a different set of parameters. This study aimed to identify the tools, and their respective parameters, that are used for evaluating wound healing. This integrative review was carried out using the following databasesLiteratura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, CumulativeIndex to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.Thirty-five studies were considered; the most commonly used instrument was PUSH, followed by BWAT, DESIGN and DESIGN-R. The most frequently assessed components were size (area, volume, depth), exudate, tissue type, and signs of infection or inflammation. The tools revealed the complexity of both the process and the evaluation of healing. Thus, the study contributes to ensuring the selection of the best tool for each individual case. |
id |
UFG-13_af3aa5667d12a536e8e4191cb0cb8ee7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/49425 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-13 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative reviewInstrumentos para avaliação da cicatrização de lesões de pele: revisão integrativaThe assessment of wounds in patients requires the selection of appropriate tools; however, it may be difficult to select the tool that is best suited to each case as each tool has a different set of parameters. This study aimed to identify the tools, and their respective parameters, that are used for evaluating wound healing. This integrative review was carried out using the following databasesLiteratura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, CumulativeIndex to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.Thirty-five studies were considered; the most commonly used instrument was PUSH, followed by BWAT, DESIGN and DESIGN-R. The most frequently assessed components were size (area, volume, depth), exudate, tissue type, and signs of infection or inflammation. The tools revealed the complexity of both the process and the evaluation of healing. Thus, the study contributes to ensuring the selection of the best tool for each individual case.A avaliação dos pacientes com feridas embasa a seleção de intervenções apropriadas; no entanto, a existência de instrumentos com diferentes parâmetros pode dificultar a escolha daquele mais adequado a cada necessidade. O objetivo do estudo foi identificarinstrumentos utilizados e seus respectivos parâmetros para avaliação do processo de cicatrização. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa, realizada nas bases de dados Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Cumulattive Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literarure, PubMed, Web of Science e Scopus. Foram considerados 35 estudos; o instrumento mais utilizado foi o PUSH, seguido da BWAT, DESING e DESIGN-R. As características mais avaliadas foram tamanho (área, volume, profundidade), exsudato, tipo de tecido, sinais de infecção ou inflamação. Os instrumentos evidenciaram a complexidade do processo de cicatrização e de sua avaliação, assim, o estudo contribui para embasar a escolha do melhor instrumento para cada necessidade.Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG2018-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/4942510.5216/ree.v20.49425Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 20 (2018); v20a40Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 20 (2018); v20a401518-1944reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermageminstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32640https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32641Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCristina Garbuio, DanielleMara Zamarioli, CristinaChantal Magalhães da Silva, NatáliaOliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de SouzaCarvalho, Emília Campos2022-05-24T20:39:49Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/49425Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/fenPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/oairee.fen@ufg.br1518-19441518-1944opendoar:2022-05-24T20:39:49Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review Instrumentos para avaliação da cicatrização de lesões de pele: revisão integrativa |
title |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review |
spellingShingle |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review Cristina Garbuio, Danielle |
title_short |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review |
title_full |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review |
title_fullStr |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review |
title_sort |
Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review |
author |
Cristina Garbuio, Danielle |
author_facet |
Cristina Garbuio, Danielle Mara Zamarioli, Cristina Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza Carvalho, Emília Campos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mara Zamarioli, Cristina Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza Carvalho, Emília Campos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cristina Garbuio, Danielle Mara Zamarioli, Cristina Chantal Magalhães da Silva, Natália Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka de Souza Carvalho, Emília Campos |
description |
The assessment of wounds in patients requires the selection of appropriate tools; however, it may be difficult to select the tool that is best suited to each case as each tool has a different set of parameters. This study aimed to identify the tools, and their respective parameters, that are used for evaluating wound healing. This integrative review was carried out using the following databasesLiteratura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, CumulativeIndex to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.Thirty-five studies were considered; the most commonly used instrument was PUSH, followed by BWAT, DESIGN and DESIGN-R. The most frequently assessed components were size (area, volume, depth), exudate, tissue type, and signs of infection or inflammation. The tools revealed the complexity of both the process and the evaluation of healing. Thus, the study contributes to ensuring the selection of the best tool for each individual case. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425 10.5216/ree.v20.49425 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/ree.v20.49425 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32640 https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/49425/32641 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 20 (2018); v20a40 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 20 (2018); v20a40 1518-1944 reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ree.fen@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1797049171624067072 |