Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/64789 |
Resumo: | The research analyzes the principle of non-regression in environmental matters in the perspective of its application, by the Supreme Federal Court (STF), in the judgments of the direct actions of (in)constitutionality interposed in face of the creation of the Consolidated Rural Areas, regulated by Law n.º 12.651, of 2012, the Brazilian Forest Law. In this context, an approach is made about the evolution and understanding of the environmental question in the global scenario, of environmental regulation by the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 and the creation of Consolidated Rural Areas. From the perspective of affirming the principle of non-regression in environmental matters, at the normative and jurisprudential level, are analyzed the decisions of the Supreme Federal Court on the Consolidated Rural Areas instituted in the Brazilian Forest Law of 2012. The principle of non-regression in environmental matters, as guarantor of environmental achievements, aims to ensure protection of the environment, as well as its unfolding in the duty of progressive protection, whether by state or private bodies. In the decisions of the Supreme Court, the principle is mentioned and analyzed in several passages, however without its effective application. The study is conducted by documentary analysis of decisions and doctrinal construction and concludes that there was an incorrect application of the principle environmental non-regression by the Federal Supreme Court in the case of Law 12.651/2012. |
id |
UFG-14_d93d653f42bf73da3827774c2cbed700 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/64789 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areasO PRINCÍPIO DA VEDAÇÃO DE RETROCESSO AMBIENTAL E SUA APLICAÇÃO PELO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL EM FACE DA ANÁLISE DE (IN)CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS ÁREAS RURAIS CONSOLIDADASThe research analyzes the principle of non-regression in environmental matters in the perspective of its application, by the Supreme Federal Court (STF), in the judgments of the direct actions of (in)constitutionality interposed in face of the creation of the Consolidated Rural Areas, regulated by Law n.º 12.651, of 2012, the Brazilian Forest Law. In this context, an approach is made about the evolution and understanding of the environmental question in the global scenario, of environmental regulation by the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 and the creation of Consolidated Rural Areas. From the perspective of affirming the principle of non-regression in environmental matters, at the normative and jurisprudential level, are analyzed the decisions of the Supreme Federal Court on the Consolidated Rural Areas instituted in the Brazilian Forest Law of 2012. The principle of non-regression in environmental matters, as guarantor of environmental achievements, aims to ensure protection of the environment, as well as its unfolding in the duty of progressive protection, whether by state or private bodies. In the decisions of the Supreme Court, the principle is mentioned and analyzed in several passages, however without its effective application. The study is conducted by documentary analysis of decisions and doctrinal construction and concludes that there was an incorrect application of the principle environmental non-regression by the Federal Supreme Court in the case of Law 12.651/2012.A pesquisa trata sobre o princípio da vedação de retrocesso ambiental na perspectiva de sua aplicação, pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), nos julgamentos das ações diretas de (in)constitucionalidades interpostas em face da criação das Áreas Rurais Consolidadas, reguladas pela Lei nº 12.651, de 2012, que dispõe sobre a Lei Florestal brasileira. Nesse contexto, faz-se uma abordagem sobre a evolução e compreensão da questão ambiental no cenário global, de regulação do meio ambiente na Constituição Federal brasileira de 1988 e a criação das Áreas Rurais Consolidadas. Na perspectiva de afirmação do princípio da proibição de retrocesso ambiental, no plano normativo e jurisprudencial, analisa-se as decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal sobre as Áreas Rurais Consolidadas instituídas na Lei Florestal brasileira, de 2012. O princípio da vedação de retrocesso, como garantidor das conquistas ambientais, visa a assegurar proteção ao meio ambiente, bem como de seu desdobramento no dever de progressividade da proteção, seja pelos órgãos estatais ou pelos particulares. Nas decisões do STF, o princípio é citado e analisado em diversas passagens no acórdão, contudo sem a sua efetiva aplicação. O estudo é conduzido por meio de análises de decisões e de construções doutrinárias e conclui que houve uma aplicação incorreta do princípio da vedação de retrocesso ambiental pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal no caso da Lei n.º 12.651/2012.Universidade Federal de Goiás2022-01-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliação por "double-blind review"application/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/6478910.5216/rfd.v45i3.64789Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 45 Núm. 3 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGMagazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 45 No. 3 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 45 n. 3 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG0101-7187reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/64789/37902Bevilaqua Marin, Eriberto FranciscoMARTINS DE ARAÚJO MASCARENHAS, GIOVANIinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-08T21:47:38Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/64789Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfdPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/oaimcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com2317-67330101-7187opendoar:2022-03-08T21:47:38Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas O PRINCÍPIO DA VEDAÇÃO DE RETROCESSO AMBIENTAL E SUA APLICAÇÃO PELO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL EM FACE DA ANÁLISE DE (IN)CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS ÁREAS RURAIS CONSOLIDADAS |
title |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas Bevilaqua Marin, Eriberto Francisco |
title_short |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas |
title_full |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas |
title_sort |
Analysis of the application of the environmental nonregression principle by the supreme federal court in judgments of (in)constitutionality of consolidated rural areas |
author |
Bevilaqua Marin, Eriberto Francisco |
author_facet |
Bevilaqua Marin, Eriberto Francisco MARTINS DE ARAÚJO MASCARENHAS, GIOVANI |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MARTINS DE ARAÚJO MASCARENHAS, GIOVANI |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bevilaqua Marin, Eriberto Francisco MARTINS DE ARAÚJO MASCARENHAS, GIOVANI |
description |
The research analyzes the principle of non-regression in environmental matters in the perspective of its application, by the Supreme Federal Court (STF), in the judgments of the direct actions of (in)constitutionality interposed in face of the creation of the Consolidated Rural Areas, regulated by Law n.º 12.651, of 2012, the Brazilian Forest Law. In this context, an approach is made about the evolution and understanding of the environmental question in the global scenario, of environmental regulation by the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 and the creation of Consolidated Rural Areas. From the perspective of affirming the principle of non-regression in environmental matters, at the normative and jurisprudential level, are analyzed the decisions of the Supreme Federal Court on the Consolidated Rural Areas instituted in the Brazilian Forest Law of 2012. The principle of non-regression in environmental matters, as guarantor of environmental achievements, aims to ensure protection of the environment, as well as its unfolding in the duty of progressive protection, whether by state or private bodies. In the decisions of the Supreme Court, the principle is mentioned and analyzed in several passages, however without its effective application. The study is conducted by documentary analysis of decisions and doctrinal construction and concludes that there was an incorrect application of the principle environmental non-regression by the Federal Supreme Court in the case of Law 12.651/2012. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliação por "double-blind review" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/64789 10.5216/rfd.v45i3.64789 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/64789 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/rfd.v45i3.64789 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/64789/37902 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 45 Núm. 3 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG Magazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 45 No. 3 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 45 n. 3 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG 0101-7187 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796798170341048320 |