Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7772 |
Resumo: | Little by little, the traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity was invisible and regarded as subaltern by modern society. However, due to its market potential, it has become of great importance for the drug, cosmetic, seed, etc. industries, since these knowledges applied by traditional and local communities became shortcuts to the development of biotechnology, and led to the economy of Lots of time and money in surveys. As a means of regulating access to traditional knowledge, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) presented a system of negotiations involving the prior consent of communities and the sharing of possible benefits with local and traditional populations. However, when it comes to intellectual property rights over products and processes arising from access to such knowledge, there is a conflict between the CBD provisions and the TRIPS Agreement, an international treaty regulating rights to inventions and patents. In Brazil, as a result of international articulations on the subject, the issue was initially disciplined by Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 and later endorsed by the recent Law No. 13,123 / 2015, called the Law Biodiversity Framework, which aims to establish legal The commercial use of products derived from traditional associated knowledge and the supposed fair and equitable distribution of the benefits derived from their economic exploitation. However, the Brazilian legal system suffers from numerous criticisms from both the academic and business community, due to the rigor imposed on access to knowledge and genetic heritage; And on the part of NGOs, communities and traditional peoples, who consider that there is a marked favoring of the interests of the great economic groups and an attempt at neocolonialist domination, represented by the old colony that sells the raw material and buys the industrialized product of the industrial powers. In view of this controversy, considering the important and great interest of the communities and traditional peoples on the theme, based on decolonial and foucaltian studies, it is investigated whether the Brazilian legal system of protection of the traditional knowledge associated to biodiversity and the distribution of benefits derived from the Use of these knowledge recognize and include peoples and communities or whether it is a form of perpetuation of colonial practices. |
id |
UFG-2_42373f8ff3ceb14633eff79784885631 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/7772 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Machado, Vilma de Fátimahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6256319627760082Machado, Vilma de FátimaBarreto Filho, Henyo TrindadeRoriz, JoãoSolazzi, José LuizLeitão, Rosani Moreirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4483407511651443Coelho, Marina Dias Dalat2017-09-19T14:03:50Z2017-08-11COELHO, Marina Dias Dalat. Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos. 2017. 251 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direitos Humanos) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7772Little by little, the traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity was invisible and regarded as subaltern by modern society. However, due to its market potential, it has become of great importance for the drug, cosmetic, seed, etc. industries, since these knowledges applied by traditional and local communities became shortcuts to the development of biotechnology, and led to the economy of Lots of time and money in surveys. As a means of regulating access to traditional knowledge, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) presented a system of negotiations involving the prior consent of communities and the sharing of possible benefits with local and traditional populations. However, when it comes to intellectual property rights over products and processes arising from access to such knowledge, there is a conflict between the CBD provisions and the TRIPS Agreement, an international treaty regulating rights to inventions and patents. In Brazil, as a result of international articulations on the subject, the issue was initially disciplined by Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 and later endorsed by the recent Law No. 13,123 / 2015, called the Law Biodiversity Framework, which aims to establish legal The commercial use of products derived from traditional associated knowledge and the supposed fair and equitable distribution of the benefits derived from their economic exploitation. However, the Brazilian legal system suffers from numerous criticisms from both the academic and business community, due to the rigor imposed on access to knowledge and genetic heritage; And on the part of NGOs, communities and traditional peoples, who consider that there is a marked favoring of the interests of the great economic groups and an attempt at neocolonialist domination, represented by the old colony that sells the raw material and buys the industrialized product of the industrial powers. In view of this controversy, considering the important and great interest of the communities and traditional peoples on the theme, based on decolonial and foucaltian studies, it is investigated whether the Brazilian legal system of protection of the traditional knowledge associated to biodiversity and the distribution of benefits derived from the Use of these knowledge recognize and include peoples and communities or whether it is a form of perpetuation of colonial practices.Até pouco tempo os conhecimentos tradicionais associados à biodiversidade eram invisibilizados e considerados subalternos pela sociedade moderna. No entanto, devido ao seu potencial mercadológico, passou a ter grande importância para as indústrias de fármacos, cosméticos, sementes, etc, já que esses saberes aplicados pelas comunidades tradicionais e locais se tornaram atalhos para o desenvolvimento da biotecnologia, e propiciaram a economia de muito tempo e dinheiro em pesquisas. Como forma de regulamentar o acesso aos conhecimentos tradicionais a Convenção de Diversidade Biológica – CDB apresentou uma sistemática de negociações envolvendo o consentimento prévio das comunidades e a repartição de eventuais benefícios com as populações locais e tradicionais. No entanto, quando se trata dos direitos de propriedade intelectual sobre os produtos e processos oriundos do acesso a esses saberes, há um conflito entre os dispositivos da CDB e o Acordo Trips, tratado internacional que regulamenta os direitos sobre invenções e patentes. No Brasil, em decorrência das articulações internacionais sobre a temática, a questão foi disciplinada inicialmente pela Medida Provisória nº 2.186-16 e referendada posteriormente pela recente Lei nº 13.123/2015, denominada de Marco Legal da Biodiversidade, que visa o estabelecimento dos marcos legais quanto ao uso comercial dos produtos oriundos dos conhecimentos tradicionais associados e a suposta repartição justa e equitativa dos benefícios derivados da sua exploração econômica. No entanto, o sistema jurídico brasileiro sofre inúmeras críticas, tanto por parte da comunidade acadêmica e empresarial, em razão do rigor imposto ao acesso aos conhecimentos e ao patrimônio genético; quanto por parte de ONGs, comunidades e povos tradicionais, que consideram existir um favorecimento acentuado dos interesses dos grandes grupos econômicos e uma tentativa de dominação neocolonialista, que vende a matéria-prima e compra o produto industrializado das potências industriais. Diante deste controvérsia, considerando a importante e grande interesse das comunidades e povos tradicionais sobre a temática, fundamentando-se em estudos decoloniais e foucaltianos, se investigou se o sistema jurídico brasileiro de proteção aos conhecimentos tradicionais associados à biodiversidade e a repartição de benefícios derivados do uso desses saberes reconhecem e incluem os povos e comunidades ou se ao contrário disso contribui para a manutenção das práticas coloniais.Submitted by Franciele Moreira (francielemoreyra@gmail.com) on 2017-09-13T19:43:41Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Marina Dias Dalat Coelho - 2017.pdf: 1973435 bytes, checksum: dcf0e9c1362abb41b06b5200d7deb8d5 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-09-19T14:03:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Marina Dias Dalat Coelho - 2017.pdf: 1973435 bytes, checksum: dcf0e9c1362abb41b06b5200d7deb8d5 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-19T14:03:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Marina Dias Dalat Coelho - 2017.pdf: 1973435 bytes, checksum: dcf0e9c1362abb41b06b5200d7deb8d5 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-11Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Direitos Humanos (PRPG)UFGBrasilPró-Reitoria de Pós-graduação (PRPG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessComunidadesPovosConhecimento tradicionalPropriedade intelectualDecolonialidadeCommunitiesPeoplesTraditional knowledgeIntellectual propertyDecolonialityTEORIA DO DIREITO::ANTROPOLOGIA JURIDICAPropriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanosIntellectual property and traditional knowledge: a analysis decolonial discursive about the recognition of the traditional communities and peoples in the brazilian law system from the human rights' perspectiveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis2804041811745128369600600600600-26453918839264606383942335322816232662075167498588264571reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGCC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/dce99c4d-7803-4d57-8654-80c50ffac167/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/2738aff0-0e32-4c7e-bc1d-9e0e6b27bb08/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e4e01987-c0a1-4712-84be-984b199076c2/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/82800e95-bab0-4e4f-a33c-383861b4d074/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALDissertação - Marina Dias Dalat Coelho - 2017.pdfDissertação - Marina Dias Dalat Coelho - 2017.pdfapplication/pdf1973435http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b956867b-1eaa-4fa3-a6bc-4fe6e28924e5/downloaddcf0e9c1362abb41b06b5200d7deb8d5MD55tede/77722017-09-19 11:03:50.467http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/7772http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2017-09-19T14:03:50Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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 |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Intellectual property and traditional knowledge: a analysis decolonial discursive about the recognition of the traditional communities and peoples in the brazilian law system from the human rights' perspective |
title |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
spellingShingle |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos Coelho, Marina Dias Dalat Comunidades Povos Conhecimento tradicional Propriedade intelectual Decolonialidade Communities Peoples Traditional knowledge Intellectual property Decoloniality TEORIA DO DIREITO::ANTROPOLOGIA JURIDICA |
title_short |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
title_full |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
title_fullStr |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
title_sort |
Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos |
author |
Coelho, Marina Dias Dalat |
author_facet |
Coelho, Marina Dias Dalat |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Vilma de Fátima |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6256319627760082 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Vilma de Fátima |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Barreto Filho, Henyo Trindade |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Roriz, João |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Solazzi, José Luiz |
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv |
Leitão, Rosani Moreira |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4483407511651443 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coelho, Marina Dias Dalat |
contributor_str_mv |
Machado, Vilma de Fátima Machado, Vilma de Fátima Barreto Filho, Henyo Trindade Roriz, João Solazzi, José Luiz Leitão, Rosani Moreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunidades Povos Conhecimento tradicional Propriedade intelectual Decolonialidade |
topic |
Comunidades Povos Conhecimento tradicional Propriedade intelectual Decolonialidade Communities Peoples Traditional knowledge Intellectual property Decoloniality TEORIA DO DIREITO::ANTROPOLOGIA JURIDICA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Communities Peoples Traditional knowledge Intellectual property Decoloniality |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
TEORIA DO DIREITO::ANTROPOLOGIA JURIDICA |
description |
Little by little, the traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity was invisible and regarded as subaltern by modern society. However, due to its market potential, it has become of great importance for the drug, cosmetic, seed, etc. industries, since these knowledges applied by traditional and local communities became shortcuts to the development of biotechnology, and led to the economy of Lots of time and money in surveys. As a means of regulating access to traditional knowledge, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) presented a system of negotiations involving the prior consent of communities and the sharing of possible benefits with local and traditional populations. However, when it comes to intellectual property rights over products and processes arising from access to such knowledge, there is a conflict between the CBD provisions and the TRIPS Agreement, an international treaty regulating rights to inventions and patents. In Brazil, as a result of international articulations on the subject, the issue was initially disciplined by Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 and later endorsed by the recent Law No. 13,123 / 2015, called the Law Biodiversity Framework, which aims to establish legal The commercial use of products derived from traditional associated knowledge and the supposed fair and equitable distribution of the benefits derived from their economic exploitation. However, the Brazilian legal system suffers from numerous criticisms from both the academic and business community, due to the rigor imposed on access to knowledge and genetic heritage; And on the part of NGOs, communities and traditional peoples, who consider that there is a marked favoring of the interests of the great economic groups and an attempt at neocolonialist domination, represented by the old colony that sells the raw material and buys the industrialized product of the industrial powers. In view of this controversy, considering the important and great interest of the communities and traditional peoples on the theme, based on decolonial and foucaltian studies, it is investigated whether the Brazilian legal system of protection of the traditional knowledge associated to biodiversity and the distribution of benefits derived from the Use of these knowledge recognize and include peoples and communities or whether it is a form of perpetuation of colonial practices. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-19T14:03:50Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
COELHO, Marina Dias Dalat. Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos. 2017. 251 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direitos Humanos) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7772 |
identifier_str_mv |
COELHO, Marina Dias Dalat. Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais: uma análise discursiva decolonial sobre o reconhecimento dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos. 2017. 251 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direitos Humanos) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017. |
url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7772 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
2804041811745128369 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-264539188392646063 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
8394233532281623266 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Direitos Humanos (PRPG) |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Pró-Reitoria de Pós-graduação (PRPG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/dce99c4d-7803-4d57-8654-80c50ffac167/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/2738aff0-0e32-4c7e-bc1d-9e0e6b27bb08/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e4e01987-c0a1-4712-84be-984b199076c2/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/82800e95-bab0-4e4f-a33c-383861b4d074/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b956867b-1eaa-4fa3-a6bc-4fe6e28924e5/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 dcf0e9c1362abb41b06b5200d7deb8d5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1798044428347113472 |