As influências das práticas de gestão nas vivências de sofrimento no trabalho dos subordinados em um órgão do Poder Judiciário com atuação em Goiás

• Autor(a) principal: Pires, Camila Nobre Costa
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• dARK ID: ark:/38995/001300000cx3s
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8375
• topic: Psicodinâmica do trabalho; Gestão do trabalho; Sofrimento no trabalho; Work psychodynamics; Work management; Suffering at work; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA

The labor organization affects the workers lives and appropriates of their subjectivity, not only in the company space, as in their qualification and personal life. In establishing the division of tasks and men for the execution of the activities, this organization establishes ways of performing the tasks and ways of control, which include the supervision and the hierarchy. In this process, managers occupy a prominent role, being responsible for planning, organizing, leading, executing and controlling. The way how they act in the organizations is not unique, it can vary between hetero-management forms to models more participative and collective. In view of the above, the objective of this study was to analyze the influence of management styles on the indicators of suffering in the subordinates work. This research used the theoretical referential of the work psychodynamics and consisted in a case study carried out with a sample of workers from a judiciary public organization operating in the state of Goiás. The study is quali-quantitative, having as instruments of data collection the Protocol for the Evaluation of Psychosocial Risks at Work (PROART) and a questionnaire about the management. The PROART proposes four scales: Scale of Prescribed Organization of Work, Scale of Management Style, Scale of Pathogenic Suffering at Work and Scale of Physical and Psychosocial Damages at Work. The quantitative data were submitted to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The results interpreted according to PROART guidelines, focusing on the comprehension of the management styles influences on the suffering in the work of subordinate laborers. The qualitative data were submitted to the Meaning Core Analysis (ANS). The research was carried out in a Judiciary Branch in the state of Goiás, from the universe of 540 servers stationed in courts and that did not hold management positions, 125 responded to the instrument during data collection. The results showed medium psychosocial risks for the following dimensions: tasks division; mental exhaustion and physical damages. The following dimensions were assessed as low risks: social division of labor; lack of meaning of work; lack of recognition; psychological damages and social damages. Regarding to the management style, the results point to a moderate presence of managerialist and collective characteristics. The regression analysis allowed to verify directly proportional relation among social division of labor (predictor) and collective style; managerialist style and social division of labor (predictors) and lack of recognition. In addition, the lack of recognition is characterized as a predictor of psychological damage, which shows that the consequences of management can extrapolate the suffering at work and culminate in illness. However, this experience is minimized due to the characteristics of the social division of labor, which presented satisfactory results in the sample researched.