DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, Juliano Luis
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ateliê Geográfico
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668
Resumo: The process of modernization of agriculture has increased the homogenization of production patterns to the detriment of local characteristics of traditional farmers. This has led to a breakdown of symbolic values of cultural and social reproduction based on relation to the land. The traditional logic of production considered that the function of the land was to supply the basic needs of subsistence, in conjunction with a marketable surplus. For the Government, in commit to the advancement of the capitalist system, these peasants had no relevance in terms of economic growth and needing new techniques to be increased in order to fit into the trading circuit, with increased income in the production unit and the resulting debt. Thus, there were representations conflicts between two logics, which led to serious consequences for the Brazilian peasantry. In this context, agroecology is presented as a theoretical perspective and an alternative of resistance from the peasantry to continue producing and living in the countryside.
id UFG-5_0f642302a091d8f2212eeaf2788dfb5d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/16668
network_acronym_str UFG-5
network_name_str Ateliê Geográfico
repository_id_str
spelling DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGYPOLÍTICA DE DESARROLLO, LA PRODUCCIÓN CAMPESINA Y LOS DESAFÍOS DE LA AGROECOLOGÍAPolítica de desenvolvimento, produção camponesa e os desafios da agroecologia - DOI 10.5216/ag.v4i12.12784The process of modernization of agriculture has increased the homogenization of production patterns to the detriment of local characteristics of traditional farmers. This has led to a breakdown of symbolic values of cultural and social reproduction based on relation to the land. The traditional logic of production considered that the function of the land was to supply the basic needs of subsistence, in conjunction with a marketable surplus. For the Government, in commit to the advancement of the capitalist system, these peasants had no relevance in terms of economic growth and needing new techniques to be increased in order to fit into the trading circuit, with increased income in the production unit and the resulting debt. Thus, there were representations conflicts between two logics, which led to serious consequences for the Brazilian peasantry. In this context, agroecology is presented as a theoretical perspective and an alternative of resistance from the peasantry to continue producing and living in the countryside.El proceso de modernización de la agricultura ha aumentado la homogeneización de los modelos de producción en detrimento de las características locales de los agricultores tradicionales. Esto llevó a una ruptura de los valores simbólicos de la reproducción cultural y social basado en la vinculación con la tierra. La lógica tradicional de producción considerado que la función de la tierra era para abastecer las necesidades básicas de subsistencia, em conjunción a un excedente comercializable. Para el Estado, comprometido con el adelanto del sistema capitalista, estos campesinos no tenían ninguna relevancia en términos de crecimiento económico y tenían necesidad de nuevas técnicas para entrar en el circuito comercial, con un ingreso mayor en la unidad de producción y la deuda consiguiente. Así, se produjeron conflictos de representaciones entre dos distintos logicas, que dio lugar a graves consecuencias para los campesinos brasileños. En este contexto, la agroecología se presenta como una perspectiva teórica y una estrategia alternativa de la resistencia de los campesinos a seguir con la producción y vida en el campo.O processo de modernização da agricultura intensificou a homogeneização dos padrões de produção em detrimento às características locais dos agricultores tradicionais. Isso levou a uma desagregação de valores simbólicos de reprodução social e cultural baseados no vínculo com a terra. A lógica tradicional de produção considerava que a função da terra era suprir as necessidades básicas de subsistência, em articulação com um excedente comercializável. Para o Estado, comprometido com o avanço do sistema capitalista, esses camponeses não possuíam relevância do ponto de vista econômico e necessitavam do incremento de novas técnicas para se inserirem no circuito mercantil, com o aumento da renda na unidade de produção e o consequente endividamento. Assim, ocorreram conflitos de representações entre duas lógicas distintas, que acarretaram graves consequências para o campesinato brasileiro. Nesse contexto, a agroecologia se apresenta como uma perspectiva teórica e uma estratégia alternativa de resistência do campesinato para continuar produzindo e vivendo no campo.Universidade Federal de Goiás2011-12-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2010); 122-146Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2010); 122-146Ateliê Geográfico; v. 4 n. 4 (2010); 122-1461982-195610.5216/ag.v4i4.%areponame:Ateliê Geográficoinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668/1011210.5216/ag.v4i4.16668Borges, Juliano LuisSguarezi, Sandro Beneditoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-07-21T17:06:19Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/16668Revistahttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/ateliePUBhttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/atelie/oairevista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br1982-19561982-1956opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:13.077599Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
POLÍTICA DE DESARROLLO, LA PRODUCCIÓN CAMPESINA Y LOS DESAFÍOS DE LA AGROECOLOGÍA
Política de desenvolvimento, produção camponesa e os desafios da agroecologia - DOI 10.5216/ag.v4i12.12784
title DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
spellingShingle DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
Borges, Juliano Luis
title_short DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
title_full DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
title_fullStr DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
title_full_unstemmed DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
title_sort DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
author Borges, Juliano Luis
author_facet Borges, Juliano Luis
Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito
author_role author
author2 Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, Juliano Luis
Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito
description The process of modernization of agriculture has increased the homogenization of production patterns to the detriment of local characteristics of traditional farmers. This has led to a breakdown of symbolic values of cultural and social reproduction based on relation to the land. The traditional logic of production considered that the function of the land was to supply the basic needs of subsistence, in conjunction with a marketable surplus. For the Government, in commit to the advancement of the capitalist system, these peasants had no relevance in terms of economic growth and needing new techniques to be increased in order to fit into the trading circuit, with increased income in the production unit and the resulting debt. Thus, there were representations conflicts between two logics, which led to serious consequences for the Brazilian peasantry. In this context, agroecology is presented as a theoretical perspective and an alternative of resistance from the peasantry to continue producing and living in the countryside.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668
url https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668/10112
10.5216/ag.v4i4.16668
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2010); 122-146
Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2010); 122-146
Ateliê Geográfico; v. 4 n. 4 (2010); 122-146
1982-1956
10.5216/ag.v4i4.%a
reponame:Ateliê Geográfico
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ateliê Geográfico
collection Ateliê Geográfico
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1799874835004784640

Registros relacionados