DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ateliê Geográfico |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668 |
Resumo: | The process of modernization of agriculture has increased the homogenization of production patterns to the detriment of local characteristics of traditional farmers. This has led to a breakdown of symbolic values of cultural and social reproduction based on relation to the land. The traditional logic of production considered that the function of the land was to supply the basic needs of subsistence, in conjunction with a marketable surplus. For the Government, in commit to the advancement of the capitalist system, these peasants had no relevance in terms of economic growth and needing new techniques to be increased in order to fit into the trading circuit, with increased income in the production unit and the resulting debt. Thus, there were representations conflicts between two logics, which led to serious consequences for the Brazilian peasantry. In this context, agroecology is presented as a theoretical perspective and an alternative of resistance from the peasantry to continue producing and living in the countryside. |
id |
UFG-5_0f642302a091d8f2212eeaf2788dfb5d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/16668 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-5 |
network_name_str |
Ateliê Geográfico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGYPOLÍTICA DE DESARROLLO, LA PRODUCCIÓN CAMPESINA Y LOS DESAFÍOS DE LA AGROECOLOGÍAPolítica de desenvolvimento, produção camponesa e os desafios da agroecologia - DOI 10.5216/ag.v4i12.12784The process of modernization of agriculture has increased the homogenization of production patterns to the detriment of local characteristics of traditional farmers. This has led to a breakdown of symbolic values of cultural and social reproduction based on relation to the land. The traditional logic of production considered that the function of the land was to supply the basic needs of subsistence, in conjunction with a marketable surplus. For the Government, in commit to the advancement of the capitalist system, these peasants had no relevance in terms of economic growth and needing new techniques to be increased in order to fit into the trading circuit, with increased income in the production unit and the resulting debt. Thus, there were representations conflicts between two logics, which led to serious consequences for the Brazilian peasantry. In this context, agroecology is presented as a theoretical perspective and an alternative of resistance from the peasantry to continue producing and living in the countryside.El proceso de modernización de la agricultura ha aumentado la homogeneización de los modelos de producción en detrimento de las características locales de los agricultores tradicionales. Esto llevó a una ruptura de los valores simbólicos de la reproducción cultural y social basado en la vinculación con la tierra. La lógica tradicional de producción considerado que la función de la tierra era para abastecer las necesidades básicas de subsistencia, em conjunción a un excedente comercializable. Para el Estado, comprometido con el adelanto del sistema capitalista, estos campesinos no tenían ninguna relevancia en términos de crecimiento económico y tenían necesidad de nuevas técnicas para entrar en el circuito comercial, con un ingreso mayor en la unidad de producción y la deuda consiguiente. Así, se produjeron conflictos de representaciones entre dos distintos logicas, que dio lugar a graves consecuencias para los campesinos brasileños. En este contexto, la agroecología se presenta como una perspectiva teórica y una estrategia alternativa de la resistencia de los campesinos a seguir con la producción y vida en el campo.O processo de modernização da agricultura intensificou a homogeneização dos padrões de produção em detrimento às características locais dos agricultores tradicionais. Isso levou a uma desagregação de valores simbólicos de reprodução social e cultural baseados no vínculo com a terra. A lógica tradicional de produção considerava que a função da terra era suprir as necessidades básicas de subsistência, em articulação com um excedente comercializável. Para o Estado, comprometido com o avanço do sistema capitalista, esses camponeses não possuíam relevância do ponto de vista econômico e necessitavam do incremento de novas técnicas para se inserirem no circuito mercantil, com o aumento da renda na unidade de produção e o consequente endividamento. Assim, ocorreram conflitos de representações entre duas lógicas distintas, que acarretaram graves consequências para o campesinato brasileiro. Nesse contexto, a agroecologia se apresenta como uma perspectiva teórica e uma estratégia alternativa de resistência do campesinato para continuar produzindo e vivendo no campo.Universidade Federal de Goiás2011-12-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2010); 122-146Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2010); 122-146Ateliê Geográfico; v. 4 n. 4 (2010); 122-1461982-195610.5216/ag.v4i4.%areponame:Ateliê Geográficoinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668/1011210.5216/ag.v4i4.16668Borges, Juliano LuisSguarezi, Sandro Beneditoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-07-21T17:06:19Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/16668Revistahttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/ateliePUBhttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/atelie/oairevista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br1982-19561982-1956opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:13.077599Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY POLÍTICA DE DESARROLLO, LA PRODUCCIÓN CAMPESINA Y LOS DESAFÍOS DE LA AGROECOLOGÍA Política de desenvolvimento, produção camponesa e os desafios da agroecologia - DOI 10.5216/ag.v4i12.12784 |
title |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY |
spellingShingle |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY Borges, Juliano Luis |
title_short |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY |
title_full |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY |
title_fullStr |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY |
title_full_unstemmed |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY |
title_sort |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY, PEASANT PRODUCTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF AGROECOLOGY |
author |
Borges, Juliano Luis |
author_facet |
Borges, Juliano Luis Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Juliano Luis Sguarezi, Sandro Benedito |
description |
The process of modernization of agriculture has increased the homogenization of production patterns to the detriment of local characteristics of traditional farmers. This has led to a breakdown of symbolic values of cultural and social reproduction based on relation to the land. The traditional logic of production considered that the function of the land was to supply the basic needs of subsistence, in conjunction with a marketable surplus. For the Government, in commit to the advancement of the capitalist system, these peasants had no relevance in terms of economic growth and needing new techniques to be increased in order to fit into the trading circuit, with increased income in the production unit and the resulting debt. Thus, there were representations conflicts between two logics, which led to serious consequences for the Brazilian peasantry. In this context, agroecology is presented as a theoretical perspective and an alternative of resistance from the peasantry to continue producing and living in the countryside. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16668/10112 10.5216/ag.v4i4.16668 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2010); 122-146 Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2010); 122-146 Ateliê Geográfico; v. 4 n. 4 (2010); 122-146 1982-1956 10.5216/ag.v4i4.%a reponame:Ateliê Geográfico instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ateliê Geográfico |
collection |
Ateliê Geográfico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1799874835004784640 |