Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ateliê Geográfico |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/54116 |
Resumo: | The organization of the rural production has been defined by a diversification which varies from specialization to the plurality of activities, from production in large companies to the production in small ones. The organization in a small property focused on family farming produces a dynamics which involves agricultural activities, secondary activities and non-agricultural ones. The combination of agricultural/secondary activities and non-agricultural activities, in the same property, seems like an option for settled family farmers, a practice which is called pluriactivity. The objective of this article is to analyze different perspectives seeking to understand the role of the pluriactivity for the farmer in settlement conditions. It’s considered as an objective to highlight positive and negative aspects of pluriactive practices and, therefore, be able to answer if the pluriactivity in settlements can be a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field, from theoretical and empirical studies. The studied area is the Geographic Microregion of South-west of Goiás state, in the settlements of Agrovila Rio Verdinho in the municipality of Rio Verde (GO) and Nossa Senhora de Guadalupe in the municipality of Jataí (GO). Keywords: Pluriactivity, Family farming, Settlements. |
id |
UFG-5_dd572710c60627f90d4e6d330e3086ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/54116 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-5 |
network_name_str |
Ateliê Geográfico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field?Pluriactivité dans les agglomérations rurales: une façon d’exclusion, d’inclusion ou de permanence aux champs?Pluriatividade em assentamentos rurais: forma de exclusão, inclusão ou permanência no campo?The organization of the rural production has been defined by a diversification which varies from specialization to the plurality of activities, from production in large companies to the production in small ones. The organization in a small property focused on family farming produces a dynamics which involves agricultural activities, secondary activities and non-agricultural ones. The combination of agricultural/secondary activities and non-agricultural activities, in the same property, seems like an option for settled family farmers, a practice which is called pluriactivity. The objective of this article is to analyze different perspectives seeking to understand the role of the pluriactivity for the farmer in settlement conditions. It’s considered as an objective to highlight positive and negative aspects of pluriactive practices and, therefore, be able to answer if the pluriactivity in settlements can be a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field, from theoretical and empirical studies. The studied area is the Geographic Microregion of South-west of Goiás state, in the settlements of Agrovila Rio Verdinho in the municipality of Rio Verde (GO) and Nossa Senhora de Guadalupe in the municipality of Jataí (GO). Keywords: Pluriactivity, Family farming, Settlements.L’organisation de la production rurale a été marquée par une diversification qui s’étend de la spécialisation jusqu’à la pluralité des activités ; de la production dans une grande entreprise à la production dans les petites propriétés. L’organisation à la petite propriété tournée vers l’agriculture familiale produit une dynamique qui concerne les activités agricoles, les activités secondaires et les activités non-agricoles. La combinaison des pratiques agricoles/activités secondaires et non-agricoles, dans une même propriété, apparaît comme une option pour les agriculteurs familiales assis, dont cette pratique appelée comme pluriactivité. L’objectif de cet article est d’analyser les différentes perspectives en cherchant comprendre le rôle de la pluriactivité pour l’agriculteur en condition de règlements. Il vise souligner les points positifs et négatifs des pratiques pluriactives, et finalement, répondre si la pluriactivité dans les règlements peut être une manière d’exclusion, d’inclusion ou de permanence aux champs, à partir des études théoriques et empiriques. Le domaine étudié est la Microrégion Géographique du Sud-ouest de Goiás, aux règlements appelées Agrovila Rio Verdinho, situé à Rio Verde (GO) et Nossa Senhora de Guadalupe, à Jataí (GO). Mots clés: Pluriactivités, Agriculture familiale, Agglomérations rurales.A organização da produção no rural tem sido marcada por uma diversificação que vai da especialização à pluralidade de atividades, da produção em grande empresa à produção em pequenas propriedades. A organização na pequena propriedade voltada para agricultura familiar produz uma dinâmica que envolve atividades agrícolas, para-agrícolas e não agrícolas. A combinação de práticas agrícolas/para-agrícolas e não agrícolas, em uma mesma propriedade, aparece como uma opção para os agricultores familiares assentados, prática que é denominada como pluriatividade. A intenção desse artigo é analisar diferentes perspectivas buscando compreender o papel da pluriatividade para o agricultor em condição de assentamentos. Pretende-se destacar os pontos positivos e negativos das práticas pluriativas e, por fim, responder se a pluriatividade em assentamentos pode ser uma forma de exclusão, inclusão ou permanência no campo, a partir de estudos teóricos e empíricos. O recorte espacial é Microrregião Geográfica Sudoeste de Goiás, nos Assentamentos Agrovila Rio Verdinho no munícipio de Rio Verde (GO) e Nossa Senhora de Guadalupe no munícipio de Jataí (GO). Palavras-chaves: Pluriatividade, Agricultura familiar, Assentamentos.Universidade Federal de Goiás2019-08-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/5411610.5216/ag.v13i2.54116Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019); 187-207Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2019); 187-207Ateliê Geográfico; v. 13 n. 2 (2019); 187-2071982-1956reponame:Ateliê Geográficoinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/54116/33638Copyright (c) 2019 Ateliê Geográficoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Juliana Abadia PradoPeixinho, Dimas Moraes2020-08-17T20:04:08Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/54116Revistahttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/ateliePUBhttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/atelie/oairevista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br1982-19561982-1956opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:31.178215Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? Pluriactivité dans les agglomérations rurales: une façon d’exclusion, d’inclusion ou de permanence aux champs? Pluriatividade em assentamentos rurais: forma de exclusão, inclusão ou permanência no campo? |
title |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? |
spellingShingle |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? Soares, Juliana Abadia Prado |
title_short |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? |
title_full |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? |
title_fullStr |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? |
title_sort |
Pluriactivity in rural settlements: is it a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field? |
author |
Soares, Juliana Abadia Prado |
author_facet |
Soares, Juliana Abadia Prado Peixinho, Dimas Moraes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peixinho, Dimas Moraes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Juliana Abadia Prado Peixinho, Dimas Moraes |
description |
The organization of the rural production has been defined by a diversification which varies from specialization to the plurality of activities, from production in large companies to the production in small ones. The organization in a small property focused on family farming produces a dynamics which involves agricultural activities, secondary activities and non-agricultural ones. The combination of agricultural/secondary activities and non-agricultural activities, in the same property, seems like an option for settled family farmers, a practice which is called pluriactivity. The objective of this article is to analyze different perspectives seeking to understand the role of the pluriactivity for the farmer in settlement conditions. It’s considered as an objective to highlight positive and negative aspects of pluriactive practices and, therefore, be able to answer if the pluriactivity in settlements can be a kind of exclusion, inclusion or permanence in the field, from theoretical and empirical studies. The studied area is the Geographic Microregion of South-west of Goiás state, in the settlements of Agrovila Rio Verdinho in the municipality of Rio Verde (GO) and Nossa Senhora de Guadalupe in the municipality of Jataí (GO). Keywords: Pluriactivity, Family farming, Settlements. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/54116 10.5216/ag.v13i2.54116 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/54116 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/ag.v13i2.54116 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/54116/33638 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Ateliê Geográfico info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Ateliê Geográfico |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019); 187-207 Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2019); 187-207 Ateliê Geográfico; v. 13 n. 2 (2019); 187-207 1982-1956 reponame:Ateliê Geográfico instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ateliê Geográfico |
collection |
Ateliê Geográfico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1799874836806238208 |