ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira, Franzolin Neto, Raul, Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida, Junqueira, Otto Mack, Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885
Resumo: An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics, probiotics and their combination on performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotics sensibility to the antibiotics and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: antibiotic in the diet (without antibiotic, virginiamicin, and avilamicin) and probiotic in the diet (without probiotic, and probiotics A and B), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. The probiotics were: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. It was verified that the tested probiotics can be used together with sodic monensine (coccidiostatic) and the avilamicin (growth promoter). However, the presence of virginiamicin can impair the probiotics viability, since the probiotics microorganisms were sensible to virginiamicin (observed in vitro). There was no significant interaction between antibiotic and probiotic for the evaluated variables. Mortality was reduced by the use of probiotics A or B, whereas the use of avilamicin increased mortality from 1 to 42 days of age. The other performance, carcass and parts yield characteristics were not influenced by the administration of probiotics, antibiotics or by the combination of such products in the diets.    KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.
id UFG-7_02691a8f22ba6b0c6e2de2444883dac9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5885
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICSALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 1. PROBIÓTICOSProdução de avesAn experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics, probiotics and their combination on performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotics sensibility to the antibiotics and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: antibiotic in the diet (without antibiotic, virginiamicin, and avilamicin) and probiotic in the diet (without probiotic, and probiotics A and B), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. The probiotics were: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. It was verified that the tested probiotics can be used together with sodic monensine (coccidiostatic) and the avilamicin (growth promoter). However, the presence of virginiamicin can impair the probiotics viability, since the probiotics microorganisms were sensible to virginiamicin (observed in vitro). There was no significant interaction between antibiotic and probiotic for the evaluated variables. Mortality was reduced by the use of probiotics A or B, whereas the use of avilamicin increased mortality from 1 to 42 days of age. The other performance, carcass and parts yield characteristics were not influenced by the administration of probiotics, antibiotics or by the combination of such products in the diets.    KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.Desenvolveu-se um experimento para avaliar o efeito de diferentes antibióticos, probióticos e suas combinações sobre o desempenho e rendimento de carcaça de frangos de corte e também para verificar a sensibilidade dos probióticos aos antibióticos e ao agente anticoccidiano utilizados. Empregaram-se 1.440 pintos com um dia de idade, machos, da linhagem Hubbard, distribuídos em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 3 x 3, com os fatores antibióticos na ração (sem antibiótico, virginiamicina e avilamicina) e probióticos na ração (sem probiótico, probiótico A e B), totalizando nove tratamentos com quatro repetições de quarenta aves cada. Os probióticos foram: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus e Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. Verificou-se que os probióticos testados podem ser empregados conjuntamente com a monensina sódica (agente anticoccidiano) e a avilamicina (promotor de crescimento). No entanto, a presença de virginiamicina pode comprometer a viabilidade dos probióticos, dada a sensibilidade, in vitro, dos microrganismos presentes nos probióticos. Não houve interação entre probióticos e antibióticos para as variáveis avaliadas. Houve redução da mortalidade quando se utilizaram os probióticos A ou B e aumento na presença de avilamicina para o período de 1 a 42 dias de idade. As demais variáveis de desempenho e o rendimento de carcaça e de partes não foram modificados pela administração dos probióticos, antibióticos ou pela combinação desses produtos.PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Aditivos, aves, desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, rendimento de partes.Universidade Federal de Goiás2009-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por parespesquisaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/588510.5216/cab.v10i1.5885Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 18-28Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 18-281809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4567https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4760Faria, Douglas Emygdio deHenrique, Ana Paula FerreiraFranzolin Neto, RaulMedeiros, Alessandra AparecidaJunqueira, Otto MackFaria Filho, Daniel Emygdio deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-04-03T19:01:19Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5885Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:23.165663Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
ALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 1. PROBIÓTICOS
title ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
spellingShingle ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Produção de aves
title_short ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
title_full ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
title_fullStr ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
title_full_unstemmed ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
title_sort ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
author Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
author_facet Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira
Franzolin Neto, Raul
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Junqueira, Otto Mack
Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
author_role author
author2 Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira
Franzolin Neto, Raul
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Junqueira, Otto Mack
Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira
Franzolin Neto, Raul
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Junqueira, Otto Mack
Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produção de aves
topic Produção de aves
description An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics, probiotics and their combination on performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotics sensibility to the antibiotics and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: antibiotic in the diet (without antibiotic, virginiamicin, and avilamicin) and probiotic in the diet (without probiotic, and probiotics A and B), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. The probiotics were: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. It was verified that the tested probiotics can be used together with sodic monensine (coccidiostatic) and the avilamicin (growth promoter). However, the presence of virginiamicin can impair the probiotics viability, since the probiotics microorganisms were sensible to virginiamicin (observed in vitro). There was no significant interaction between antibiotic and probiotic for the evaluated variables. Mortality was reduced by the use of probiotics A or B, whereas the use of avilamicin increased mortality from 1 to 42 days of age. The other performance, carcass and parts yield characteristics were not influenced by the administration of probiotics, antibiotics or by the combination of such products in the diets.    KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-04-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885
10.5216/cab.v10i1.5885
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/cab.v10i1.5885
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4567
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4760
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 18-28
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 18-28
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874785621049344