ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885 |
Resumo: | An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics, probiotics and their combination on performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotics sensibility to the antibiotics and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: antibiotic in the diet (without antibiotic, virginiamicin, and avilamicin) and probiotic in the diet (without probiotic, and probiotics A and B), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. The probiotics were: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. It was verified that the tested probiotics can be used together with sodic monensine (coccidiostatic) and the avilamicin (growth promoter). However, the presence of virginiamicin can impair the probiotics viability, since the probiotics microorganisms were sensible to virginiamicin (observed in vitro). There was no significant interaction between antibiotic and probiotic for the evaluated variables. Mortality was reduced by the use of probiotics A or B, whereas the use of avilamicin increased mortality from 1 to 42 days of age. The other performance, carcass and parts yield characteristics were not influenced by the administration of probiotics, antibiotics or by the combination of such products in the diets. KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance. |
id |
UFG-7_02691a8f22ba6b0c6e2de2444883dac9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5885 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICSALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 1. PROBIÓTICOSProdução de avesAn experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics, probiotics and their combination on performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotics sensibility to the antibiotics and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: antibiotic in the diet (without antibiotic, virginiamicin, and avilamicin) and probiotic in the diet (without probiotic, and probiotics A and B), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. The probiotics were: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. It was verified that the tested probiotics can be used together with sodic monensine (coccidiostatic) and the avilamicin (growth promoter). However, the presence of virginiamicin can impair the probiotics viability, since the probiotics microorganisms were sensible to virginiamicin (observed in vitro). There was no significant interaction between antibiotic and probiotic for the evaluated variables. Mortality was reduced by the use of probiotics A or B, whereas the use of avilamicin increased mortality from 1 to 42 days of age. The other performance, carcass and parts yield characteristics were not influenced by the administration of probiotics, antibiotics or by the combination of such products in the diets. KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.Desenvolveu-se um experimento para avaliar o efeito de diferentes antibióticos, probióticos e suas combinações sobre o desempenho e rendimento de carcaça de frangos de corte e também para verificar a sensibilidade dos probióticos aos antibióticos e ao agente anticoccidiano utilizados. Empregaram-se 1.440 pintos com um dia de idade, machos, da linhagem Hubbard, distribuídos em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 3 x 3, com os fatores antibióticos na ração (sem antibiótico, virginiamicina e avilamicina) e probióticos na ração (sem probiótico, probiótico A e B), totalizando nove tratamentos com quatro repetições de quarenta aves cada. Os probióticos foram: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus e Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. Verificou-se que os probióticos testados podem ser empregados conjuntamente com a monensina sódica (agente anticoccidiano) e a avilamicina (promotor de crescimento). No entanto, a presença de virginiamicina pode comprometer a viabilidade dos probióticos, dada a sensibilidade, in vitro, dos microrganismos presentes nos probióticos. Não houve interação entre probióticos e antibióticos para as variáveis avaliadas. Houve redução da mortalidade quando se utilizaram os probióticos A ou B e aumento na presença de avilamicina para o período de 1 a 42 dias de idade. As demais variáveis de desempenho e o rendimento de carcaça e de partes não foram modificados pela administração dos probióticos, antibióticos ou pela combinação desses produtos.PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Aditivos, aves, desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, rendimento de partes.Universidade Federal de Goiás2009-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por parespesquisaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/588510.5216/cab.v10i1.5885Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 18-28Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 18-281809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4567https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4760Faria, Douglas Emygdio deHenrique, Ana Paula FerreiraFranzolin Neto, RaulMedeiros, Alessandra AparecidaJunqueira, Otto MackFaria Filho, Daniel Emygdio deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-04-03T19:01:19Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5885Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:23.165663Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS ALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 1. PROBIÓTICOS |
title |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS |
spellingShingle |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS Faria, Douglas Emygdio de Produção de aves |
title_short |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS |
title_full |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS |
title_fullStr |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS |
title_full_unstemmed |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS |
title_sort |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 1. PROBIOTICS |
author |
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de |
author_facet |
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira Franzolin Neto, Raul Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida Junqueira, Otto Mack Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira Franzolin Neto, Raul Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida Junqueira, Otto Mack Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira Franzolin Neto, Raul Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida Junqueira, Otto Mack Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Produção de aves |
topic |
Produção de aves |
description |
An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics, probiotics and their combination on performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotics sensibility to the antibiotics and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: antibiotic in the diet (without antibiotic, virginiamicin, and avilamicin) and probiotic in the diet (without probiotic, and probiotics A and B), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. The probiotics were: A) Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B) Bacillus subtilis. It was verified that the tested probiotics can be used together with sodic monensine (coccidiostatic) and the avilamicin (growth promoter). However, the presence of virginiamicin can impair the probiotics viability, since the probiotics microorganisms were sensible to virginiamicin (observed in vitro). There was no significant interaction between antibiotic and probiotic for the evaluated variables. Mortality was reduced by the use of probiotics A or B, whereas the use of avilamicin increased mortality from 1 to 42 days of age. The other performance, carcass and parts yield characteristics were not influenced by the administration of probiotics, antibiotics or by the combination of such products in the diets. KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-04-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885 10.5216/cab.v10i1.5885 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/cab.v10i1.5885 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4567 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5885/4760 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 18-28 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 18-28 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799874785621049344 |