ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira, Franzolin Neto, Raul, Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida, Junqueira, Otto Mack, Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886
Resumo: An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic and their combination on performance, carcass yield, and pH of some parts of crop, duodenum and ceca, and of the diets of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotic sensibility to the antibiotic and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: additives in the diet (without antibiotic, avoparcin, and probiotic composed by Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and organic acids in the diet (without organic acids, fumaric acid, and propionic+formic acid), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. It was verified that the microorganisms Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus were sensible to avoparcin in the concentration wich was employed in the diets. However, the presence of sodic monensine did not inhibit the growth, in vitro, of the probiotic’s microorganisms. Organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic or their combinations did not affect the performance, carcass yield, and the pH of the crop, duodenum and cecum in relation to the control diet. Nevertheless, the fumaric acid promoted a reduction in the pH of the diet, and might contribute to an inhibition of the growth of undesirable microorganisms.KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.
id UFG-7_b57eac5ba3aa9352770e6a7c762dd41e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5886
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICSALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 2. ÁCIDOS ORGÂNICOS E PROBIÓTICOSProdução de avesAn experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic and their combination on performance, carcass yield, and pH of some parts of crop, duodenum and ceca, and of the diets of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotic sensibility to the antibiotic and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: additives in the diet (without antibiotic, avoparcin, and probiotic composed by Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and organic acids in the diet (without organic acids, fumaric acid, and propionic+formic acid), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. It was verified that the microorganisms Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus were sensible to avoparcin in the concentration wich was employed in the diets. However, the presence of sodic monensine did not inhibit the growth, in vitro, of the probiotic’s microorganisms. Organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic or their combinations did not affect the performance, carcass yield, and the pH of the crop, duodenum and cecum in relation to the control diet. Nevertheless, the fumaric acid promoted a reduction in the pH of the diet, and might contribute to an inhibition of the growth of undesirable microorganisms.KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.Desenvolveu-se um experimento para avaliar os efeitos de ácidos orgânicos, antibiótico, probiótico e suas combinações sobre o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça e pH de papo, duodeno e ceco e das rações de frangos de corte. Além disso, o experimento objetivou verificar a sensibilidade do probiótico ao antibiótico e ao agente anticoccidiano utilizados. Empregaram-se 1.440 pintos com um dia de idade, machos, da linhagem Hubbard, distribuídos em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 3 x 3, com os fatores: aditivos na ração (sem antibiótico, avoparcina e probiótico composto por Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus e Saccharomyces cerevisiae) e ácidos orgânicos na ração (sem ácido orgânico, ácido fumárico e ácido propiônico+fórmico), totalizando nove tratamentos com quatro repetições de quarenta aves cada. Observou-se que os microorganismos Streptococcus faecium e Lactobacillus acidophilus foram sensíveis à avoparcina na concentração em que se empregou nas rações. No entanto, a presença de monensina sódica (anticoccidiano) não inibiu o crescimento, in vitro, dos microrganismos presentes no probiótico. Os ácidos orgânicos, o antibiótico, o probiótico ou suas combinações não alteraram o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça e o pH do papo, duodeno e ceco em relação à dieta-controle. Contudo, o ácido fumárico promoveu redução do pH da ração, podendo contribuir para a inibição do desenvolvimento de microorganismos indesejáveis. PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Aditivos, aves, desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, rendimento de partesUniversidade Federal de Goiás2009-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresPesquisaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/588610.5216/cab.v10i1.5886Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 29-39Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 29-391809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4568https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4765Faria, Douglas Emygdio deHenrique, Ana Paula FerreiraFranzolin Neto, RaulMedeiros, Alessandra AparecidaJunqueira, Otto MackFaria Filho, Daniel Emygdio deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-04-03T19:01:19Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5886Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:23.246085Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
ALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 2. ÁCIDOS ORGÂNICOS E PROBIÓTICOS
title ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
spellingShingle ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Produção de aves
title_short ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
title_full ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
title_fullStr ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
title_full_unstemmed ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
title_sort ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
author Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
author_facet Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira
Franzolin Neto, Raul
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Junqueira, Otto Mack
Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
author_role author
author2 Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira
Franzolin Neto, Raul
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Junqueira, Otto Mack
Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria, Douglas Emygdio de
Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira
Franzolin Neto, Raul
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Junqueira, Otto Mack
Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produção de aves
topic Produção de aves
description An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic and their combination on performance, carcass yield, and pH of some parts of crop, duodenum and ceca, and of the diets of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotic sensibility to the antibiotic and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: additives in the diet (without antibiotic, avoparcin, and probiotic composed by Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and organic acids in the diet (without organic acids, fumaric acid, and propionic+formic acid), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. It was verified that the microorganisms Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus were sensible to avoparcin in the concentration wich was employed in the diets. However, the presence of sodic monensine did not inhibit the growth, in vitro, of the probiotic’s microorganisms. Organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic or their combinations did not affect the performance, carcass yield, and the pH of the crop, duodenum and cecum in relation to the control diet. Nevertheless, the fumaric acid promoted a reduction in the pH of the diet, and might contribute to an inhibition of the growth of undesirable microorganisms.KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-04-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886
10.5216/cab.v10i1.5886
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/cab.v10i1.5886
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4568
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4765
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 29-39
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 29-39
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874785623146496