ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886 |
Resumo: | An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic and their combination on performance, carcass yield, and pH of some parts of crop, duodenum and ceca, and of the diets of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotic sensibility to the antibiotic and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: additives in the diet (without antibiotic, avoparcin, and probiotic composed by Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and organic acids in the diet (without organic acids, fumaric acid, and propionic+formic acid), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. It was verified that the microorganisms Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus were sensible to avoparcin in the concentration wich was employed in the diets. However, the presence of sodic monensine did not inhibit the growth, in vitro, of the probiotic’s microorganisms. Organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic or their combinations did not affect the performance, carcass yield, and the pH of the crop, duodenum and cecum in relation to the control diet. Nevertheless, the fumaric acid promoted a reduction in the pH of the diet, and might contribute to an inhibition of the growth of undesirable microorganisms.KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance. |
id |
UFG-7_b57eac5ba3aa9352770e6a7c762dd41e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5886 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICSALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 2. ÁCIDOS ORGÂNICOS E PROBIÓTICOSProdução de avesAn experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic and their combination on performance, carcass yield, and pH of some parts of crop, duodenum and ceca, and of the diets of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotic sensibility to the antibiotic and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: additives in the diet (without antibiotic, avoparcin, and probiotic composed by Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and organic acids in the diet (without organic acids, fumaric acid, and propionic+formic acid), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. It was verified that the microorganisms Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus were sensible to avoparcin in the concentration wich was employed in the diets. However, the presence of sodic monensine did not inhibit the growth, in vitro, of the probiotic’s microorganisms. Organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic or their combinations did not affect the performance, carcass yield, and the pH of the crop, duodenum and cecum in relation to the control diet. Nevertheless, the fumaric acid promoted a reduction in the pH of the diet, and might contribute to an inhibition of the growth of undesirable microorganisms.KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance.Desenvolveu-se um experimento para avaliar os efeitos de ácidos orgânicos, antibiótico, probiótico e suas combinações sobre o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça e pH de papo, duodeno e ceco e das rações de frangos de corte. Além disso, o experimento objetivou verificar a sensibilidade do probiótico ao antibiótico e ao agente anticoccidiano utilizados. Empregaram-se 1.440 pintos com um dia de idade, machos, da linhagem Hubbard, distribuídos em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 3 x 3, com os fatores: aditivos na ração (sem antibiótico, avoparcina e probiótico composto por Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus e Saccharomyces cerevisiae) e ácidos orgânicos na ração (sem ácido orgânico, ácido fumárico e ácido propiônico+fórmico), totalizando nove tratamentos com quatro repetições de quarenta aves cada. Observou-se que os microorganismos Streptococcus faecium e Lactobacillus acidophilus foram sensíveis à avoparcina na concentração em que se empregou nas rações. No entanto, a presença de monensina sódica (anticoccidiano) não inibiu o crescimento, in vitro, dos microrganismos presentes no probiótico. Os ácidos orgânicos, o antibiótico, o probiótico ou suas combinações não alteraram o desempenho, rendimento de carcaça e o pH do papo, duodeno e ceco em relação à dieta-controle. Contudo, o ácido fumárico promoveu redução do pH da ração, podendo contribuir para a inibição do desenvolvimento de microorganismos indesejáveis. PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Aditivos, aves, desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, rendimento de partesUniversidade Federal de Goiás2009-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresPesquisaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/588610.5216/cab.v10i1.5886Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 29-39Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 29-391809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4568https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4765Faria, Douglas Emygdio deHenrique, Ana Paula FerreiraFranzolin Neto, RaulMedeiros, Alessandra AparecidaJunqueira, Otto MackFaria Filho, Daniel Emygdio deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-04-03T19:01:19Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/5886Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:23.246085Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS ALTERNATIVAS AO USO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS COMO PROMOTORES DE CRESCIMENTO PARA FRANGOS DE CORTE: 2. ÁCIDOS ORGÂNICOS E PROBIÓTICOS |
title |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS |
spellingShingle |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS Faria, Douglas Emygdio de Produção de aves |
title_short |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS |
title_full |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS |
title_fullStr |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS |
title_full_unstemmed |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS |
title_sort |
ALTERNATIVES TO THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC GROWTH PROMOTERS FOR BROILER CHICKENS: 2. ORGANIC ACIDS AND PROBIOTICS |
author |
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de |
author_facet |
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira Franzolin Neto, Raul Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida Junqueira, Otto Mack Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira Franzolin Neto, Raul Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida Junqueira, Otto Mack Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria, Douglas Emygdio de Henrique, Ana Paula Ferreira Franzolin Neto, Raul Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida Junqueira, Otto Mack Faria Filho, Daniel Emygdio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Produção de aves |
topic |
Produção de aves |
description |
An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic and their combination on performance, carcass yield, and pH of some parts of crop, duodenum and ceca, and of the diets of broiler chickens. Also, the experiment aimed to verify the probiotic sensibility to the antibiotic and the coccidiostatic utilized. Fourteen hundred and forty one-day-old male chicks, Hubbard, were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial design: additives in the diet (without antibiotic, avoparcin, and probiotic composed by Streptococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and organic acids in the diet (without organic acids, fumaric acid, and propionic+formic acid), totaling nine treatments with four replicates of 40 birds each. It was verified that the microorganisms Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus were sensible to avoparcin in the concentration wich was employed in the diets. However, the presence of sodic monensine did not inhibit the growth, in vitro, of the probiotic’s microorganisms. Organic acids, antibiotic, probiotic or their combinations did not affect the performance, carcass yield, and the pH of the crop, duodenum and cecum in relation to the control diet. Nevertheless, the fumaric acid promoted a reduction in the pH of the diet, and might contribute to an inhibition of the growth of undesirable microorganisms.KEY WORDS: Additives, birds, carcass yield, parts yield, performance. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-04-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886 10.5216/cab.v10i1.5886 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/cab.v10i1.5886 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4568 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/5886/4765 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 29-39 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 29-39 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1825947784704950272 |