ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301 |
Resumo: | Neonatal physiology has peculiarities inherent to the age group. The objective of this study was to monitor the systemic arterial pressure in lambs during neonatal period. We used 20 Ile de France lambs, from birth and at 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days of life. The following parameters were analyzed: heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and average blood pressure (ABP) by oscillometric method petMAP™, and SBP with Doppler. Invasive pressure validated indirect methods with the average 101.52 ± 12.04 mmHg. The averages with petMAP™ were as follows: HR (156.38 ± 37.46 bpm); DBP (63.80 ± 11.14 mmHg); ABP (81.58 ± 11.83 mmHg); SBP (112.48 ± 15.68 mmHg) and SBP by Dobler (90.27 ± 12.11 mmHg). There was significant difference in HR and blood pressure among the moments. Indirect methods differ between each other in 12.30 mmHg (overestimation of 11%). Comparing with the invasive methods, both overestimated values of 4% and 16% in PAS, respectively, for Doppler and petMAP™. The results showed that the Doppler method has established a good relationship with the invasive one being useful for gauging the SBP. The oscillometric method requires larger studies to be used in small ruminants.Keywords: Doppler; lamb; neonatal period; oscillometric; systemic blood pressure. |
id |
UFG-7_5e4f9e5e00c156b7bf75de31fe35e814 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/37301 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBSACURÁCIA DOS MÉTODOS OSCILOMÉTRICO (PETMAP®) E DOPPLER PARA AFERIÇÃO INDIRETA DA PRESSÃO ARTERIAL EM CORDEIROSAnimal SanityNeonatologiaOvinosClínica animalNeonatal physiology has peculiarities inherent to the age group. The objective of this study was to monitor the systemic arterial pressure in lambs during neonatal period. We used 20 Ile de France lambs, from birth and at 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days of life. The following parameters were analyzed: heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and average blood pressure (ABP) by oscillometric method petMAP™, and SBP with Doppler. Invasive pressure validated indirect methods with the average 101.52 ± 12.04 mmHg. The averages with petMAP™ were as follows: HR (156.38 ± 37.46 bpm); DBP (63.80 ± 11.14 mmHg); ABP (81.58 ± 11.83 mmHg); SBP (112.48 ± 15.68 mmHg) and SBP by Dobler (90.27 ± 12.11 mmHg). There was significant difference in HR and blood pressure among the moments. Indirect methods differ between each other in 12.30 mmHg (overestimation of 11%). Comparing with the invasive methods, both overestimated values of 4% and 16% in PAS, respectively, for Doppler and petMAP™. The results showed that the Doppler method has established a good relationship with the invasive one being useful for gauging the SBP. The oscillometric method requires larger studies to be used in small ruminants.Keywords: Doppler; lamb; neonatal period; oscillometric; systemic blood pressure.A fisiologia neonatal possui peculiaridades inerentes à faixa etária. O objetivo do estudo foi monitorar a pressão arterial sistêmica de cordeiros durante o período neonatal. Foram usados 20 cordeiros da raça Ile de France, a partir do nascimento e aos sete, 14, 21, 28 e 35 dias de vida. Os parâmetros analisados foram: frequência cardíaca (FC), pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), diastólica (PAD) e média (PAM) pelo método oscilométrico petMAP®, e PAS com Doppler. Também foi realizada a pressão invasiva para validar os métodos indiretos obtendo a média de 101,52 ± 12,04 mmHg. As médias utilizando o petMAP® foram: FC (156,38 ± 37,46 bpm); PAD (63,80 ± 11,14 mmHg); PAM (81,58± 11,83 mmHg); PAS (112,48 ±15,68 mmHg) e PAS (90,27 ± 12,11 mmHg) com Doppler. Houve diferença significativa na FC e pressão arterial entre os momentos analisados. Os métodos indiretos diferiram entre si em 12,30 mmHg (superestimação de 11%). Comparando com a invasiva, os dois métodos superestimaram os valores da PAS em 4% e 16%, respectivamente, para Doppler e petMAP®. Os resultados mostraram que o método Doppler estabeleceu boa relação com a invasiva, sendo útil para aferição da PAS. O método oscilométrico necessita de maiores estudos para sua utilização em pequenos ruminantes.Palavras-chave: Doppler; oscilométrico; ovinos; período neonatal; pressão arterial sistêmica.Universidade Federal de Goiás2016-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchAvaliado por paresPesquisa Científicaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/3730110.1590/cab17437301Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 17 No. 4 (2016); 593-600Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 17 n. 4 (2016); 593-6001809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301/21921https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301/21922Ulian, Carla Maria VelaCarvajal, Angie Paola LagosVelasquez, Diana Rocio BeceraTeixeira Neto, Francisco JoséLourenço, Maria Lúcia GomesChiacchio, Simone Biagioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-11-23T10:12:40Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/37301Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2016-11-23T10:12:40Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS ACURÁCIA DOS MÉTODOS OSCILOMÉTRICO (PETMAP®) E DOPPLER PARA AFERIÇÃO INDIRETA DA PRESSÃO ARTERIAL EM CORDEIROS |
title |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS |
spellingShingle |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS Ulian, Carla Maria Vela Animal Sanity Neonatologia Ovinos Clínica animal |
title_short |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS |
title_full |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS |
title_fullStr |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS |
title_full_unstemmed |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS |
title_sort |
ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS |
author |
Ulian, Carla Maria Vela |
author_facet |
Ulian, Carla Maria Vela Carvajal, Angie Paola Lagos Velasquez, Diana Rocio Becera Teixeira Neto, Francisco José Lourenço, Maria Lúcia Gomes Chiacchio, Simone Biagio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvajal, Angie Paola Lagos Velasquez, Diana Rocio Becera Teixeira Neto, Francisco José Lourenço, Maria Lúcia Gomes Chiacchio, Simone Biagio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ulian, Carla Maria Vela Carvajal, Angie Paola Lagos Velasquez, Diana Rocio Becera Teixeira Neto, Francisco José Lourenço, Maria Lúcia Gomes Chiacchio, Simone Biagio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal Sanity Neonatologia Ovinos Clínica animal |
topic |
Animal Sanity Neonatologia Ovinos Clínica animal |
description |
Neonatal physiology has peculiarities inherent to the age group. The objective of this study was to monitor the systemic arterial pressure in lambs during neonatal period. We used 20 Ile de France lambs, from birth and at 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days of life. The following parameters were analyzed: heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and average blood pressure (ABP) by oscillometric method petMAP™, and SBP with Doppler. Invasive pressure validated indirect methods with the average 101.52 ± 12.04 mmHg. The averages with petMAP™ were as follows: HR (156.38 ± 37.46 bpm); DBP (63.80 ± 11.14 mmHg); ABP (81.58 ± 11.83 mmHg); SBP (112.48 ± 15.68 mmHg) and SBP by Dobler (90.27 ± 12.11 mmHg). There was significant difference in HR and blood pressure among the moments. Indirect methods differ between each other in 12.30 mmHg (overestimation of 11%). Comparing with the invasive methods, both overestimated values of 4% and 16% in PAS, respectively, for Doppler and petMAP™. The results showed that the Doppler method has established a good relationship with the invasive one being useful for gauging the SBP. The oscillometric method requires larger studies to be used in small ruminants.Keywords: Doppler; lamb; neonatal period; oscillometric; systemic blood pressure. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Research Avaliado por pares Pesquisa Científica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301 10.1590/cab17437301 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/cab17437301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301/21921 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301/21922 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 17 No. 4 (2016); 593-600 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 17 n. 4 (2016); 593-600 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1789440222195351552 |