COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Abud, Lucas Jacomini, Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho, Nunes Dode, Margot Alves, Sereno, José Robson Bezerra, Martins, Carlos Frederico
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233
Resumo: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of bovine semen cryopreservation using the controlled-rate freezing machine versus the conventional method (uncontrolled curve) by the parameters of sperm quality and viability in post-thaw period. Semen from four adult crossbreed bulls was cryopreserved in Tris-yolk-glycerol medium. The computer assisted analysis of thawed semen detected the following results: PM 56.50±22.25%; VAP 34.77±4.25?m/s; VSL 28.17±4.25?m/s; VCL 58.45±6.85?m/s; STR 82.00±2.31%; LIN 49.50±3.32%, to automated system and PM 57.00±13.11%; VAP 25.75±1.66?m/s; VSL 23.32±1.99?m/s; VCL 63.32±1.79?m/s; STR 82.25±3.59?m/s; LIN 50.00±4.97?m/s to conventional cryopreservation system. The results of plasma membrane and acrosome integrity evaluation were 54.7±12.55% and 36.13±22.20% for the automated system and 53.22±13.22% and 47.26±5.74% for the conventional system, respectively. The parameters evaluated demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between the cryopreservation systems. Thus, the choice of the bovine semen cryopreservation method to be used on a farm is a responsibility of the technician, and should be based on the reality of each farm. Therefore, it is always necessary to consider that the conventional system of bovine semen cryopreservation can vary more than the automated system, which, despite the cost of the equipment, can ensure repeatability of the results and consequent quality of cryopreserved bovine semen.KEYWORDS: artificial insemination; biotechnology; bovine sperm; cryopreservation; cryopreservation curve.
id UFG-7_89c622728c003cd724d8f7d5318709ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/12233
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATIONCOMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS SISTEMAS AUTOMATIZADO E CONVENCIONAL DE CRIOPRESERVAÇÃO DE SÊMEN BOVINOAnimal ReproductionBiotecnologiaestação de montainseminação artificialsêmen bovino.The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of bovine semen cryopreservation using the controlled-rate freezing machine versus the conventional method (uncontrolled curve) by the parameters of sperm quality and viability in post-thaw period. Semen from four adult crossbreed bulls was cryopreserved in Tris-yolk-glycerol medium. The computer assisted analysis of thawed semen detected the following results: PM 56.50±22.25%; VAP 34.77±4.25?m/s; VSL 28.17±4.25?m/s; VCL 58.45±6.85?m/s; STR 82.00±2.31%; LIN 49.50±3.32%, to automated system and PM 57.00±13.11%; VAP 25.75±1.66?m/s; VSL 23.32±1.99?m/s; VCL 63.32±1.79?m/s; STR 82.25±3.59?m/s; LIN 50.00±4.97?m/s to conventional cryopreservation system. The results of plasma membrane and acrosome integrity evaluation were 54.7±12.55% and 36.13±22.20% for the automated system and 53.22±13.22% and 47.26±5.74% for the conventional system, respectively. The parameters evaluated demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between the cryopreservation systems. Thus, the choice of the bovine semen cryopreservation method to be used on a farm is a responsibility of the technician, and should be based on the reality of each farm. Therefore, it is always necessary to consider that the conventional system of bovine semen cryopreservation can vary more than the automated system, which, despite the cost of the equipment, can ensure repeatability of the results and consequent quality of cryopreserved bovine semen.KEYWORDS: artificial insemination; biotechnology; bovine sperm; cryopreservation; cryopreservation curve.O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficiência do sistema automatizado (curva de resfriamento controlada eletronicamente) de congelação de sêmen bovino versus o sistema convencional (curva não controlada) por meio dos parâmetros de qualidade e viabilidade espermática no período pós-descongelação. O sêmen de quatro touros azebuados adultos foram criopreservados simultaneamente em meio tris, gema e glicerol 7%. A avaliação computadorizada do sêmen descongelado detectou os seguintes parâmetros: MP 56,50±22,25%; VAP 34,77±4,25?m/s; VSL 28,17±4,25 ?m/s; VCL 58,45±6,85?m/s; STR 82,00±2,31%; LIN 49,50±3,32%, para o sistema automatizado e MP. 57,00±13,11%; VAP 25,75±1,66?m/s; VSL 23,32±1,99?m/s; VCL 63,32±1,79?m/s; STR 82,25±3,59?m/s; LIN 50,00±4,97?m/s para o sistema convencional.  Os valores médios das avaliações de integridade de membrana plasmática e integridade acrossomal foram de 54,72±12,55% e 36,13±22,20% para o sistema automatizado e 53,22±13,22% e 47,26±5,74% para o sistema convencional, respectivamente. Com os parâmetros avaliados foi possível identificar que não houve diferença estatística entre os sistemas de criopreservação.  Desta forma, a escolha do método de criopreservação do sêmen bovino para utilização direta na propriedade fica a critério do técnico responsável, que deverá se basear na realidade de cada propriedade. Para tanto, sempre se deve considerar que o sistema convencional pode trazer mais variações que o sistema automatizado que, apesar do custo do equipamento, pode garantir repetibilidade nos resultados e consequente qualidade do sêmen bovino criopreservado.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: biotecnologia; criopreservação; curvas de congelação; inseminação artificial. Universidade Federal de Goiás2014-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchAvaliado por paresPesquisa Científicaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/1223310.5216/cab.v15i1.12233Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2014); 32-37Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 15 n. 1 (2014); 32-371809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16213https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16214Abud, Cátia O. GuimarãesAbud, Lucas JacominiOliveira Neto, José CarvalhoNunes Dode, Margot AlvesSereno, José Robson BezerraMartins, Carlos Fredericoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-28T13:07:01Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/12233Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:45.617816Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS SISTEMAS AUTOMATIZADO E CONVENCIONAL DE CRIOPRESERVAÇÃO DE SÊMEN BOVINO
title COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
spellingShingle COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães
Animal Reproduction
Biotecnologia
estação de monta
inseminação artificial
sêmen bovino.
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
title_sort COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
author Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães
author_facet Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães
Abud, Lucas Jacomini
Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho
Nunes Dode, Margot Alves
Sereno, José Robson Bezerra
Martins, Carlos Frederico
author_role author
author2 Abud, Lucas Jacomini
Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho
Nunes Dode, Margot Alves
Sereno, José Robson Bezerra
Martins, Carlos Frederico
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães
Abud, Lucas Jacomini
Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho
Nunes Dode, Margot Alves
Sereno, José Robson Bezerra
Martins, Carlos Frederico
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal Reproduction
Biotecnologia
estação de monta
inseminação artificial
sêmen bovino.
topic Animal Reproduction
Biotecnologia
estação de monta
inseminação artificial
sêmen bovino.
description The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of bovine semen cryopreservation using the controlled-rate freezing machine versus the conventional method (uncontrolled curve) by the parameters of sperm quality and viability in post-thaw period. Semen from four adult crossbreed bulls was cryopreserved in Tris-yolk-glycerol medium. The computer assisted analysis of thawed semen detected the following results: PM 56.50±22.25%; VAP 34.77±4.25?m/s; VSL 28.17±4.25?m/s; VCL 58.45±6.85?m/s; STR 82.00±2.31%; LIN 49.50±3.32%, to automated system and PM 57.00±13.11%; VAP 25.75±1.66?m/s; VSL 23.32±1.99?m/s; VCL 63.32±1.79?m/s; STR 82.25±3.59?m/s; LIN 50.00±4.97?m/s to conventional cryopreservation system. The results of plasma membrane and acrosome integrity evaluation were 54.7±12.55% and 36.13±22.20% for the automated system and 53.22±13.22% and 47.26±5.74% for the conventional system, respectively. The parameters evaluated demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between the cryopreservation systems. Thus, the choice of the bovine semen cryopreservation method to be used on a farm is a responsibility of the technician, and should be based on the reality of each farm. Therefore, it is always necessary to consider that the conventional system of bovine semen cryopreservation can vary more than the automated system, which, despite the cost of the equipment, can ensure repeatability of the results and consequent quality of cryopreserved bovine semen.KEYWORDS: artificial insemination; biotechnology; bovine sperm; cryopreservation; cryopreservation curve.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Research
Avaliado por pares
Pesquisa Científica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233
10.5216/cab.v15i1.12233
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/cab.v15i1.12233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16213
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16214
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2014); 32-37
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 15 n. 1 (2014); 32-37
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874787069132800