COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of bovine semen cryopreservation using the controlled-rate freezing machine versus the conventional method (uncontrolled curve) by the parameters of sperm quality and viability in post-thaw period. Semen from four adult crossbreed bulls was cryopreserved in Tris-yolk-glycerol medium. The computer assisted analysis of thawed semen detected the following results: PM 56.50±22.25%; VAP 34.77±4.25?m/s; VSL 28.17±4.25?m/s; VCL 58.45±6.85?m/s; STR 82.00±2.31%; LIN 49.50±3.32%, to automated system and PM 57.00±13.11%; VAP 25.75±1.66?m/s; VSL 23.32±1.99?m/s; VCL 63.32±1.79?m/s; STR 82.25±3.59?m/s; LIN 50.00±4.97?m/s to conventional cryopreservation system. The results of plasma membrane and acrosome integrity evaluation were 54.7±12.55% and 36.13±22.20% for the automated system and 53.22±13.22% and 47.26±5.74% for the conventional system, respectively. The parameters evaluated demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between the cryopreservation systems. Thus, the choice of the bovine semen cryopreservation method to be used on a farm is a responsibility of the technician, and should be based on the reality of each farm. Therefore, it is always necessary to consider that the conventional system of bovine semen cryopreservation can vary more than the automated system, which, despite the cost of the equipment, can ensure repeatability of the results and consequent quality of cryopreserved bovine semen.KEYWORDS: artificial insemination; biotechnology; bovine sperm; cryopreservation; cryopreservation curve. |
id |
UFG-7_89c622728c003cd724d8f7d5318709ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/12233 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATIONCOMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS SISTEMAS AUTOMATIZADO E CONVENCIONAL DE CRIOPRESERVAÇÃO DE SÊMEN BOVINOAnimal ReproductionBiotecnologiaestação de montainseminação artificialsêmen bovino.The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of bovine semen cryopreservation using the controlled-rate freezing machine versus the conventional method (uncontrolled curve) by the parameters of sperm quality and viability in post-thaw period. Semen from four adult crossbreed bulls was cryopreserved in Tris-yolk-glycerol medium. The computer assisted analysis of thawed semen detected the following results: PM 56.50±22.25%; VAP 34.77±4.25?m/s; VSL 28.17±4.25?m/s; VCL 58.45±6.85?m/s; STR 82.00±2.31%; LIN 49.50±3.32%, to automated system and PM 57.00±13.11%; VAP 25.75±1.66?m/s; VSL 23.32±1.99?m/s; VCL 63.32±1.79?m/s; STR 82.25±3.59?m/s; LIN 50.00±4.97?m/s to conventional cryopreservation system. The results of plasma membrane and acrosome integrity evaluation were 54.7±12.55% and 36.13±22.20% for the automated system and 53.22±13.22% and 47.26±5.74% for the conventional system, respectively. The parameters evaluated demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between the cryopreservation systems. Thus, the choice of the bovine semen cryopreservation method to be used on a farm is a responsibility of the technician, and should be based on the reality of each farm. Therefore, it is always necessary to consider that the conventional system of bovine semen cryopreservation can vary more than the automated system, which, despite the cost of the equipment, can ensure repeatability of the results and consequent quality of cryopreserved bovine semen.KEYWORDS: artificial insemination; biotechnology; bovine sperm; cryopreservation; cryopreservation curve.O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficiência do sistema automatizado (curva de resfriamento controlada eletronicamente) de congelação de sêmen bovino versus o sistema convencional (curva não controlada) por meio dos parâmetros de qualidade e viabilidade espermática no período pós-descongelação. O sêmen de quatro touros azebuados adultos foram criopreservados simultaneamente em meio tris, gema e glicerol 7%. A avaliação computadorizada do sêmen descongelado detectou os seguintes parâmetros: MP 56,50±22,25%; VAP 34,77±4,25?m/s; VSL 28,17±4,25 ?m/s; VCL 58,45±6,85?m/s; STR 82,00±2,31%; LIN 49,50±3,32%, para o sistema automatizado e MP. 57,00±13,11%; VAP 25,75±1,66?m/s; VSL 23,32±1,99?m/s; VCL 63,32±1,79?m/s; STR 82,25±3,59?m/s; LIN 50,00±4,97?m/s para o sistema convencional. Os valores médios das avaliações de integridade de membrana plasmática e integridade acrossomal foram de 54,72±12,55% e 36,13±22,20% para o sistema automatizado e 53,22±13,22% e 47,26±5,74% para o sistema convencional, respectivamente. Com os parâmetros avaliados foi possível identificar que não houve diferença estatística entre os sistemas de criopreservação. Desta forma, a escolha do método de criopreservação do sêmen bovino para utilização direta na propriedade fica a critério do técnico responsável, que deverá se basear na realidade de cada propriedade. Para tanto, sempre se deve considerar que o sistema convencional pode trazer mais variações que o sistema automatizado que, apesar do custo do equipamento, pode garantir repetibilidade nos resultados e consequente qualidade do sêmen bovino criopreservado.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: biotecnologia; criopreservação; curvas de congelação; inseminação artificial. Universidade Federal de Goiás2014-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchAvaliado por paresPesquisa Científicaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/1223310.5216/cab.v15i1.12233Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2014); 32-37Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 15 n. 1 (2014); 32-371809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16213https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16214Abud, Cátia O. GuimarãesAbud, Lucas JacominiOliveira Neto, José CarvalhoNunes Dode, Margot AlvesSereno, José Robson BezerraMartins, Carlos Fredericoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-28T13:07:01Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/12233Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:45.617816Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS SISTEMAS AUTOMATIZADO E CONVENCIONAL DE CRIOPRESERVAÇÃO DE SÊMEN BOVINO |
title |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION |
spellingShingle |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães Animal Reproduction Biotecnologia estação de monta inseminação artificial sêmen bovino. |
title_short |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION |
title_full |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION |
title_sort |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF SEMEN BOVINE CRYOPRESERVATION |
author |
Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães |
author_facet |
Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães Abud, Lucas Jacomini Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho Nunes Dode, Margot Alves Sereno, José Robson Bezerra Martins, Carlos Frederico |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Abud, Lucas Jacomini Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho Nunes Dode, Margot Alves Sereno, José Robson Bezerra Martins, Carlos Frederico |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abud, Cátia O. Guimarães Abud, Lucas Jacomini Oliveira Neto, José Carvalho Nunes Dode, Margot Alves Sereno, José Robson Bezerra Martins, Carlos Frederico |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal Reproduction Biotecnologia estação de monta inseminação artificial sêmen bovino. |
topic |
Animal Reproduction Biotecnologia estação de monta inseminação artificial sêmen bovino. |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of bovine semen cryopreservation using the controlled-rate freezing machine versus the conventional method (uncontrolled curve) by the parameters of sperm quality and viability in post-thaw period. Semen from four adult crossbreed bulls was cryopreserved in Tris-yolk-glycerol medium. The computer assisted analysis of thawed semen detected the following results: PM 56.50±22.25%; VAP 34.77±4.25?m/s; VSL 28.17±4.25?m/s; VCL 58.45±6.85?m/s; STR 82.00±2.31%; LIN 49.50±3.32%, to automated system and PM 57.00±13.11%; VAP 25.75±1.66?m/s; VSL 23.32±1.99?m/s; VCL 63.32±1.79?m/s; STR 82.25±3.59?m/s; LIN 50.00±4.97?m/s to conventional cryopreservation system. The results of plasma membrane and acrosome integrity evaluation were 54.7±12.55% and 36.13±22.20% for the automated system and 53.22±13.22% and 47.26±5.74% for the conventional system, respectively. The parameters evaluated demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between the cryopreservation systems. Thus, the choice of the bovine semen cryopreservation method to be used on a farm is a responsibility of the technician, and should be based on the reality of each farm. Therefore, it is always necessary to consider that the conventional system of bovine semen cryopreservation can vary more than the automated system, which, despite the cost of the equipment, can ensure repeatability of the results and consequent quality of cryopreserved bovine semen.KEYWORDS: artificial insemination; biotechnology; bovine sperm; cryopreservation; cryopreservation curve. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Research Avaliado por pares Pesquisa Científica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233 10.5216/cab.v15i1.12233 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/cab.v15i1.12233 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16213 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/12233/16214 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2014); 32-37 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 15 n. 1 (2014); 32-37 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799874787069132800 |