COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of portable blood glucose measurement method in relation to the laboratory reference method, using central venous and capillary blood samples from 20 cats. The value obtained by the laboratory method using central venous blood sample was considered as the standard reference value. Other two values were obtained from the portable blood glucose meter, in which a sample from the same central venous blood and another one sample from capillary blood were used. For the 20 cats, the blood glucose results obtained by the laboratory method had an average of 80mg/dL; and the results found by the glucometer had an average of 84.1mg/dL with central venous blood and of 73.1mg/dL with capillary blood. The glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer with both blood samples compared to that achieved by the laboratory method resulted in variations below the maximum established (20%) by associations that regulate portable glucometers and by the organization for standardization, as well as the variation between the glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer using different blood samples. In the comparative analysis, there was no significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). In conclusion, the portable glucometer is effective in measuring blood glucose in cats, both from central venous blood and capillary blood samples. Keywords: cat, glucometer, glucose, measurement. |
id |
UFG-7_e25c46fbc323b6c164913d7284071da1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/31266 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLESCOMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS MÉTODOS LABORATORIAL E PORTÁTIL NA ANÁLISE DA GLICEMIA EM FELINOS COM AMOSTRAS DE SANGUE VENOSO CENTRAL E CAPILARAnimal SanitygatoglicoseglicosímetromensuraçãoThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of portable blood glucose measurement method in relation to the laboratory reference method, using central venous and capillary blood samples from 20 cats. The value obtained by the laboratory method using central venous blood sample was considered as the standard reference value. Other two values were obtained from the portable blood glucose meter, in which a sample from the same central venous blood and another one sample from capillary blood were used. For the 20 cats, the blood glucose results obtained by the laboratory method had an average of 80mg/dL; and the results found by the glucometer had an average of 84.1mg/dL with central venous blood and of 73.1mg/dL with capillary blood. The glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer with both blood samples compared to that achieved by the laboratory method resulted in variations below the maximum established (20%) by associations that regulate portable glucometers and by the organization for standardization, as well as the variation between the glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer using different blood samples. In the comparative analysis, there was no significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). In conclusion, the portable glucometer is effective in measuring blood glucose in cats, both from central venous blood and capillary blood samples. Keywords: cat, glucometer, glucose, measurement.Objetivou-se comparar a eficácia do método portátil de mensuração glicêmica com o método laboratorial de referência, utilizando-se amostras de sangue venoso central e de sangue capilar de 20 felinos. Considerou-se como valor padrão de referência o obtido pelo método laboratorial a partir de amostra de sangue venoso central. Outros dois valores foram obtidos por glicosímetro portátil, sendo utilizada amostra do mesmo sangue venoso central e outra amostra a partir de sangue capilar. Para os 20 felinos, os resultados glicêmicos verificados pelo método laboratorial tiveram média de 80mg/dL; e os resultados constatados pelo glicosímetro, média de 84,1mg/dL com sangue venoso central e 73,1mg/dL com sangue capilar. As médias glicêmicas obtidas pelo glicosímetro com ambas as amostras de sangue em relação à alcançada pelo método laboratorial resultaram em variações inferiores à máxima instituída (20%) por órgãos reguladores de glicosímetros e por entidade de padronização, bem como a variação entre as médias glicêmicas obtidas pelo aparelho com as distintas amostras de sangue. Na análise comparativa houve diferença significativa entre os métodos (p<0,05). Concluiu-se que o glicosímetro portátil é eficaz para mensuração da glicemia em felinos, tanto a partir de amostras de sangue venoso central como de sangue capilar. Palavras-chave: gato; glicose; glicosímetro; mensuração.Universidade Federal de Goiás2015-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchAvaliado por paresPesquisa Científicaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/3126610.1590/cab.v16i2.31266Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015); 279-286Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 16 n. 2 (2015); 279-2861809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18513https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18514Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia deCosta Júnior, Jair Duarte daSantos-Leonardo, AndréMorais, Kamila Santos deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-05-22T12:39:37Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/31266Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:06.491530Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS MÉTODOS LABORATORIAL E PORTÁTIL NA ANÁLISE DA GLICEMIA EM FELINOS COM AMOSTRAS DE SANGUE VENOSO CENTRAL E CAPILAR |
title |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES |
spellingShingle |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de Animal Sanity gato glicose glicosímetro mensuração |
title_short |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES |
title_full |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES |
title_sort |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES |
author |
Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da Santos-Leonardo, André Morais, Kamila Santos de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da Santos-Leonardo, André Morais, Kamila Santos de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da Santos-Leonardo, André Morais, Kamila Santos de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal Sanity gato glicose glicosímetro mensuração |
topic |
Animal Sanity gato glicose glicosímetro mensuração |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of portable blood glucose measurement method in relation to the laboratory reference method, using central venous and capillary blood samples from 20 cats. The value obtained by the laboratory method using central venous blood sample was considered as the standard reference value. Other two values were obtained from the portable blood glucose meter, in which a sample from the same central venous blood and another one sample from capillary blood were used. For the 20 cats, the blood glucose results obtained by the laboratory method had an average of 80mg/dL; and the results found by the glucometer had an average of 84.1mg/dL with central venous blood and of 73.1mg/dL with capillary blood. The glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer with both blood samples compared to that achieved by the laboratory method resulted in variations below the maximum established (20%) by associations that regulate portable glucometers and by the organization for standardization, as well as the variation between the glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer using different blood samples. In the comparative analysis, there was no significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). In conclusion, the portable glucometer is effective in measuring blood glucose in cats, both from central venous blood and capillary blood samples. Keywords: cat, glucometer, glucose, measurement. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Research Avaliado por pares Pesquisa Científica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266 10.1590/cab.v16i2.31266 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/cab.v16i2.31266 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18513 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18514 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015); 279-286 Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 16 n. 2 (2015); 279-286 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799874788680794112 |