COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da, Santos-Leonardo, André, Morais, Kamila Santos de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266
Resumo: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of portable blood glucose measurement method in relation to the laboratory reference method, using central venous and capillary blood samples from 20 cats. The value obtained by the laboratory method using central venous blood sample was considered as the standard reference value. Other two values were obtained from the portable blood glucose meter, in which a sample from the same central venous blood and another one sample from capillary blood were used. For the 20 cats, the blood glucose results obtained by the laboratory method had an average of 80mg/dL; and the results found by the glucometer had an average of 84.1mg/dL with central venous blood and of 73.1mg/dL with capillary blood. The glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer with both blood samples compared to that achieved by the laboratory method resulted in variations below the maximum established (20%) by associations that regulate portable glucometers and by the organization for standardization, as well as the variation between the glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer using different blood samples. In the comparative analysis, there was no significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). In conclusion, the portable glucometer is effective in measuring blood glucose in cats, both from central venous blood and capillary blood samples. Keywords: cat, glucometer, glucose, measurement.
id UFG-7_e25c46fbc323b6c164913d7284071da1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/31266
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLESCOMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS MÉTODOS LABORATORIAL E PORTÁTIL NA ANÁLISE DA GLICEMIA EM FELINOS COM AMOSTRAS DE SANGUE VENOSO CENTRAL E CAPILARAnimal SanitygatoglicoseglicosímetromensuraçãoThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of portable blood glucose measurement method in relation to the laboratory reference method, using central venous and capillary blood samples from 20 cats. The value obtained by the laboratory method using central venous blood sample was considered as the standard reference value. Other two values were obtained from the portable blood glucose meter, in which a sample from the same central venous blood and another one sample from capillary blood were used. For the 20 cats, the blood glucose results obtained by the laboratory method had an average of 80mg/dL; and the results found by the glucometer had an average of 84.1mg/dL with central venous blood and of 73.1mg/dL with capillary blood. The glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer with both blood samples compared to that achieved by the laboratory method resulted in variations below the maximum established (20%) by associations that regulate portable glucometers and by the organization for standardization, as well as the variation between the glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer using different blood samples. In the comparative analysis, there was no significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). In conclusion, the portable glucometer is effective in measuring blood glucose in cats, both from central venous blood and capillary blood samples. Keywords: cat, glucometer, glucose, measurement.Objetivou-se comparar a eficácia do método portátil de mensuração glicêmica com o método laboratorial de referência, utilizando-se amostras de sangue venoso central e de sangue capilar de 20 felinos. Considerou-se como valor padrão de referência o obtido pelo método laboratorial a partir de amostra de sangue venoso central. Outros dois valores foram obtidos por glicosímetro portátil, sendo utilizada amostra do mesmo sangue venoso central e outra amostra a partir de sangue capilar. Para os 20 felinos, os resultados glicêmicos verificados pelo método laboratorial tiveram média de 80mg/dL; e os resultados constatados pelo glicosímetro, média de 84,1mg/dL com sangue venoso central e 73,1mg/dL com sangue capilar. As médias glicêmicas obtidas pelo glicosímetro com ambas as amostras de sangue em relação à alcançada pelo método laboratorial resultaram em variações inferiores à máxima instituída (20%) por órgãos reguladores de glicosímetros e por entidade de padronização, bem como a variação entre as médias glicêmicas obtidas pelo aparelho com as distintas amostras de sangue. Na análise comparativa houve diferença significativa entre os métodos (p<0,05). Concluiu-se que o glicosímetro portátil é eficaz para mensuração da glicemia em felinos, tanto a partir de amostras de sangue venoso central como de sangue capilar. Palavras-chave: gato; glicose; glicosímetro; mensuração.Universidade Federal de Goiás2015-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchAvaliado por paresPesquisa Científicaapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/3126610.1590/cab.v16i2.31266Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015); 279-286Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 16 n. 2 (2015); 279-2861809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18513https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18514Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia deCosta Júnior, Jair Duarte daSantos-Leonardo, AndréMorais, Kamila Santos deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-05-22T12:39:37Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/31266Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:06.491530Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE OS MÉTODOS LABORATORIAL E PORTÁTIL NA ANÁLISE DA GLICEMIA EM FELINOS COM AMOSTRAS DE SANGUE VENOSO CENTRAL E CAPILAR
title COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
spellingShingle COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de
Animal Sanity
gato
glicose
glicosímetro
mensuração
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
title_sort COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND PORTABLE METHODS IN THE GLYCEMIC ANALYSIS IN CATS WITH CENTRAL VENOUS AND CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLES
author Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de
author_facet Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de
Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da
Santos-Leonardo, André
Morais, Kamila Santos de
author_role author
author2 Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da
Santos-Leonardo, André
Morais, Kamila Santos de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Yonara Silva Garcia de
Costa Júnior, Jair Duarte da
Santos-Leonardo, André
Morais, Kamila Santos de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal Sanity
gato
glicose
glicosímetro
mensuração
topic Animal Sanity
gato
glicose
glicosímetro
mensuração
description The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of portable blood glucose measurement method in relation to the laboratory reference method, using central venous and capillary blood samples from 20 cats. The value obtained by the laboratory method using central venous blood sample was considered as the standard reference value. Other two values were obtained from the portable blood glucose meter, in which a sample from the same central venous blood and another one sample from capillary blood were used. For the 20 cats, the blood glucose results obtained by the laboratory method had an average of 80mg/dL; and the results found by the glucometer had an average of 84.1mg/dL with central venous blood and of 73.1mg/dL with capillary blood. The glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer with both blood samples compared to that achieved by the laboratory method resulted in variations below the maximum established (20%) by associations that regulate portable glucometers and by the organization for standardization, as well as the variation between the glycemic averages obtained by the glucometer using different blood samples. In the comparative analysis, there was no significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). In conclusion, the portable glucometer is effective in measuring blood glucose in cats, both from central venous blood and capillary blood samples. Keywords: cat, glucometer, glucose, measurement.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Research
Avaliado por pares
Pesquisa Científica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266
10.1590/cab.v16i2.31266
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/cab.v16i2.31266
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18513
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/31266/18514
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015); 279-286
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 16 n. 2 (2015); 279-286
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874788680794112