Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso Sanches, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Machado Naspolini, Barbara, Persici Maroneze, Beatriz, Salame, Jéssica Paola, Normanton Guim, Thomas, Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552
Resumo: The present study aimed to evaluate the use of tumescent local anesthesia or epidural anesthesia associated with an intercostal nerve block in bitches submitted to mastectomy. Fourteen bitches from the clinical routine of the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Pelotas were premedicated with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly, then induced with propofol (2 to 6 mg/kg/IV) and maintained with 1,4V% isoflurane (calibrated vaporizer). The patients were randomly allocated into: GALT Group (n=7), which received tumescent local anesthesia (0.16%) at the dose of 15 mL/kg, and the GEBI Group (n=7) which received epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) associated with an intercostal nerve block from the 6th to 12th intercostal space with lidocaine (2 mg/kg). An increase higher than 10% in heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were considered as possible signs of nociception, to which fentanyl was administered intravenously as rescue analgesia. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of the modified Glasgow scale at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. There were no differences in physiological parameters (0>0.05) in the transoperative period intra-group and inter-group the groups. The GEBI Group required more frequent transoperative rescue analgesia (9) in comparison to the GALT Group (5), but with no statistical difference. During the postoperative period, there was no need for rescue analgesia in either group. Results suggest that epidural anesthesia associated with intercostal nerve block can be used as an alternative technique in patients with restrictions against the use of local tumescent anesthesia.Keywords: mammary tumors, pain, locoregional anesthesia, opioid.
id UFG-7_ed84afc00bcc646c9c4fa5e609937107
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/53552
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomyAnestesia local tumescente ou anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal em cadelas submetidas à mastectomiaThe present study aimed to evaluate the use of tumescent local anesthesia or epidural anesthesia associated with an intercostal nerve block in bitches submitted to mastectomy. Fourteen bitches from the clinical routine of the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Pelotas were premedicated with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly, then induced with propofol (2 to 6 mg/kg/IV) and maintained with 1,4V% isoflurane (calibrated vaporizer). The patients were randomly allocated into: GALT Group (n=7), which received tumescent local anesthesia (0.16%) at the dose of 15 mL/kg, and the GEBI Group (n=7) which received epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) associated with an intercostal nerve block from the 6th to 12th intercostal space with lidocaine (2 mg/kg). An increase higher than 10% in heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were considered as possible signs of nociception, to which fentanyl was administered intravenously as rescue analgesia. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of the modified Glasgow scale at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. There were no differences in physiological parameters (0>0.05) in the transoperative period intra-group and inter-group the groups. The GEBI Group required more frequent transoperative rescue analgesia (9) in comparison to the GALT Group (5), but with no statistical difference. During the postoperative period, there was no need for rescue analgesia in either group. Results suggest that epidural anesthesia associated with intercostal nerve block can be used as an alternative technique in patients with restrictions against the use of local tumescent anesthesia.Keywords: mammary tumors, pain, locoregional anesthesia, opioid.O presente estudo objetivou avaliar o uso da anestesia local tumescente ou da anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal em cadelas submetidas à mastectomia. Foram utilizadas 14 cadelas, provenientes da rotina do Hospital de Clínicas Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Pelotas, pré-medicadas com acepromazina (0,03 mg/kg) e morfina (0,3 mg/kg) intramuscular, induzidas com propofol (2 a 6 mg/Kg/IV) e mantidas com isofluorano à 1,4 V% (vaporizador calibrado). Após essa etapa, foram alocadas aleatoriamente em grupo GALT (n=7), que recebeu a anestesia local tumescente 0,16% na dose de 15 mL/Kg e em grupo GEBI (n=7), que recebeu como tratamento a anestesia epidural com lidocaína (5 mg/kg) e morfina (0,1 mg/kg) associada ao bloqueio intercostal, do 6º ao 12º espaço intercostal, com lidocaína (2mg/kg). Os parâmetros avaliados para sinais de nocicepção transcirúrgica e realização de resgates analgésicos com fentanil foram: frequência cardíaca, frequência respiratória, pressão arterial sistólica, pressão arterial diastólica e pressão arterial média. No pós-operatório avaliou-se a analgesia pela escala de Glasgow Modificada aos 30, 60, 120, 240 e 360 minutos. Não houve diferenças entre os parâmetros clínicos (p > 0,05) no período transoperatório entre e dentro dos grupos. O GEBI apresentou maior quantidade de resgates analgésicos transoperatórios (9) em relação a GALT (5), porém sem diferenças estatísticas. No pós-operatório, nenhum animal de ambos os grupos atingiu pontuação máxima para resgate analgésico. Pode-se concluir que a anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal é uma técnica alternativa para casos em que se tenham limitações para utilização da anestesia local tumescente.Palavras–chave: Tumores mamários; dor; anestesia locorregional; opioide.Universidade Federal de Goiás2020-06-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34910https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34911https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34914https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34915Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso Sanches, MarianaMachado Naspolini, BarbaraPersici Maroneze, BeatrizSalame, Jéssica PaolaNormanton Guim, ThomasGehrcke, Martielo Ivan2023-03-23T18:46:38Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/53552Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:23.475840Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
Anestesia local tumescente ou anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal em cadelas submetidas à mastectomia
title Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
spellingShingle Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
Cardoso Sanches, Mariana
title_short Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
title_full Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
title_fullStr Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
title_sort Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
author Cardoso Sanches, Mariana
author_facet Cardoso Sanches, Mariana
Machado Naspolini, Barbara
Persici Maroneze, Beatriz
Salame, Jéssica Paola
Normanton Guim, Thomas
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
author_role author
author2 Machado Naspolini, Barbara
Persici Maroneze, Beatriz
Salame, Jéssica Paola
Normanton Guim, Thomas
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso Sanches, Mariana
Machado Naspolini, Barbara
Persici Maroneze, Beatriz
Salame, Jéssica Paola
Normanton Guim, Thomas
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
description The present study aimed to evaluate the use of tumescent local anesthesia or epidural anesthesia associated with an intercostal nerve block in bitches submitted to mastectomy. Fourteen bitches from the clinical routine of the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Pelotas were premedicated with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly, then induced with propofol (2 to 6 mg/kg/IV) and maintained with 1,4V% isoflurane (calibrated vaporizer). The patients were randomly allocated into: GALT Group (n=7), which received tumescent local anesthesia (0.16%) at the dose of 15 mL/kg, and the GEBI Group (n=7) which received epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) associated with an intercostal nerve block from the 6th to 12th intercostal space with lidocaine (2 mg/kg). An increase higher than 10% in heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were considered as possible signs of nociception, to which fentanyl was administered intravenously as rescue analgesia. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of the modified Glasgow scale at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. There were no differences in physiological parameters (0>0.05) in the transoperative period intra-group and inter-group the groups. The GEBI Group required more frequent transoperative rescue analgesia (9) in comparison to the GALT Group (5), but with no statistical difference. During the postoperative period, there was no need for rescue analgesia in either group. Results suggest that epidural anesthesia associated with intercostal nerve block can be used as an alternative technique in patients with restrictions against the use of local tumescent anesthesia.Keywords: mammary tumors, pain, locoregional anesthesia, opioid.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34910
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34911
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34914
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34915
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publication
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874789992562688