Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552 |
Resumo: | The present study aimed to evaluate the use of tumescent local anesthesia or epidural anesthesia associated with an intercostal nerve block in bitches submitted to mastectomy. Fourteen bitches from the clinical routine of the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Pelotas were premedicated with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly, then induced with propofol (2 to 6 mg/kg/IV) and maintained with 1,4V% isoflurane (calibrated vaporizer). The patients were randomly allocated into: GALT Group (n=7), which received tumescent local anesthesia (0.16%) at the dose of 15 mL/kg, and the GEBI Group (n=7) which received epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) associated with an intercostal nerve block from the 6th to 12th intercostal space with lidocaine (2 mg/kg). An increase higher than 10% in heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were considered as possible signs of nociception, to which fentanyl was administered intravenously as rescue analgesia. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of the modified Glasgow scale at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. There were no differences in physiological parameters (0>0.05) in the transoperative period intra-group and inter-group the groups. The GEBI Group required more frequent transoperative rescue analgesia (9) in comparison to the GALT Group (5), but with no statistical difference. During the postoperative period, there was no need for rescue analgesia in either group. Results suggest that epidural anesthesia associated with intercostal nerve block can be used as an alternative technique in patients with restrictions against the use of local tumescent anesthesia.Keywords: mammary tumors, pain, locoregional anesthesia, opioid. |
id |
UFG-7_ed84afc00bcc646c9c4fa5e609937107 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/53552 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomyAnestesia local tumescente ou anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal em cadelas submetidas à mastectomiaThe present study aimed to evaluate the use of tumescent local anesthesia or epidural anesthesia associated with an intercostal nerve block in bitches submitted to mastectomy. Fourteen bitches from the clinical routine of the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Pelotas were premedicated with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly, then induced with propofol (2 to 6 mg/kg/IV) and maintained with 1,4V% isoflurane (calibrated vaporizer). The patients were randomly allocated into: GALT Group (n=7), which received tumescent local anesthesia (0.16%) at the dose of 15 mL/kg, and the GEBI Group (n=7) which received epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) associated with an intercostal nerve block from the 6th to 12th intercostal space with lidocaine (2 mg/kg). An increase higher than 10% in heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were considered as possible signs of nociception, to which fentanyl was administered intravenously as rescue analgesia. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of the modified Glasgow scale at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. There were no differences in physiological parameters (0>0.05) in the transoperative period intra-group and inter-group the groups. The GEBI Group required more frequent transoperative rescue analgesia (9) in comparison to the GALT Group (5), but with no statistical difference. During the postoperative period, there was no need for rescue analgesia in either group. Results suggest that epidural anesthesia associated with intercostal nerve block can be used as an alternative technique in patients with restrictions against the use of local tumescent anesthesia.Keywords: mammary tumors, pain, locoregional anesthesia, opioid.O presente estudo objetivou avaliar o uso da anestesia local tumescente ou da anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal em cadelas submetidas à mastectomia. Foram utilizadas 14 cadelas, provenientes da rotina do Hospital de Clínicas Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Pelotas, pré-medicadas com acepromazina (0,03 mg/kg) e morfina (0,3 mg/kg) intramuscular, induzidas com propofol (2 a 6 mg/Kg/IV) e mantidas com isofluorano à 1,4 V% (vaporizador calibrado). Após essa etapa, foram alocadas aleatoriamente em grupo GALT (n=7), que recebeu a anestesia local tumescente 0,16% na dose de 15 mL/Kg e em grupo GEBI (n=7), que recebeu como tratamento a anestesia epidural com lidocaína (5 mg/kg) e morfina (0,1 mg/kg) associada ao bloqueio intercostal, do 6º ao 12º espaço intercostal, com lidocaína (2mg/kg). Os parâmetros avaliados para sinais de nocicepção transcirúrgica e realização de resgates analgésicos com fentanil foram: frequência cardíaca, frequência respiratória, pressão arterial sistólica, pressão arterial diastólica e pressão arterial média. No pós-operatório avaliou-se a analgesia pela escala de Glasgow Modificada aos 30, 60, 120, 240 e 360 minutos. Não houve diferenças entre os parâmetros clínicos (p > 0,05) no período transoperatório entre e dentro dos grupos. O GEBI apresentou maior quantidade de resgates analgésicos transoperatórios (9) em relação a GALT (5), porém sem diferenças estatísticas. No pós-operatório, nenhum animal de ambos os grupos atingiu pontuação máxima para resgate analgésico. Pode-se concluir que a anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal é uma técnica alternativa para casos em que se tenham limitações para utilização da anestesia local tumescente.Palavras–chave: Tumores mamários; dor; anestesia locorregional; opioide.Universidade Federal de Goiás2020-06-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34910https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34911https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34914https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34915Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso Sanches, MarianaMachado Naspolini, BarbaraPersici Maroneze, BeatrizSalame, Jéssica PaolaNormanton Guim, ThomasGehrcke, Martielo Ivan2023-03-23T18:46:38Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/53552Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:23.475840Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy Anestesia local tumescente ou anestesia epidural associada ao bloqueio intercostal em cadelas submetidas à mastectomia |
title |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy |
spellingShingle |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy Cardoso Sanches, Mariana |
title_short |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy |
title_full |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy |
title_fullStr |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy |
title_sort |
Tumescent anesthesia or epidural anesthesia combined with intercostal block in bitches submitted to mastectomy |
author |
Cardoso Sanches, Mariana |
author_facet |
Cardoso Sanches, Mariana Machado Naspolini, Barbara Persici Maroneze, Beatriz Salame, Jéssica Paola Normanton Guim, Thomas Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado Naspolini, Barbara Persici Maroneze, Beatriz Salame, Jéssica Paola Normanton Guim, Thomas Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso Sanches, Mariana Machado Naspolini, Barbara Persici Maroneze, Beatriz Salame, Jéssica Paola Normanton Guim, Thomas Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan |
description |
The present study aimed to evaluate the use of tumescent local anesthesia or epidural anesthesia associated with an intercostal nerve block in bitches submitted to mastectomy. Fourteen bitches from the clinical routine of the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Pelotas were premedicated with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly, then induced with propofol (2 to 6 mg/kg/IV) and maintained with 1,4V% isoflurane (calibrated vaporizer). The patients were randomly allocated into: GALT Group (n=7), which received tumescent local anesthesia (0.16%) at the dose of 15 mL/kg, and the GEBI Group (n=7) which received epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) associated with an intercostal nerve block from the 6th to 12th intercostal space with lidocaine (2 mg/kg). An increase higher than 10% in heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were considered as possible signs of nociception, to which fentanyl was administered intravenously as rescue analgesia. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of the modified Glasgow scale at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. There were no differences in physiological parameters (0>0.05) in the transoperative period intra-group and inter-group the groups. The GEBI Group required more frequent transoperative rescue analgesia (9) in comparison to the GALT Group (5), but with no statistical difference. During the postoperative period, there was no need for rescue analgesia in either group. Results suggest that epidural anesthesia associated with intercostal nerve block can be used as an alternative technique in patients with restrictions against the use of local tumescent anesthesia.Keywords: mammary tumors, pain, locoregional anesthesia, opioid. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34910 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34911 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34914 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/53552/34915 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publication Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799874789992562688 |