Oral and Written

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcuschi, Luiz Antônio
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Signótica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/7396
Resumo: Based on the premise that it is not possible to analyze the relation between oral and written language by concentrating only on the linguistic code, this essay considers the totality of discursive production as a social practice and analyzes the contexts of production, the uses and forms of oral and written transmission in daily life. To this end a double distinction is proposed between: (a) orality and literacy as social practices, and (b) speech and writing as modes of use. The first distinction is based on the observation of sociocommunicative reality and the second, on linguistic facts. Several current theoretical tendencies are examined. All perspectives that polarize the relation between oral and written language are rejected, while a position focusing on the multifactorial relati­on between the two practices within a continuum of uses and genres that rejects intrin­sic properties, both negative and positive, of these practices, is adopted.
id UFG-8_3deec6150bf1a31f675b81ca2a90b7b7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/7396
network_acronym_str UFG-8
network_name_str Signótica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Oral and WrittenOralidade e escrita Based on the premise that it is not possible to analyze the relation between oral and written language by concentrating only on the linguistic code, this essay considers the totality of discursive production as a social practice and analyzes the contexts of production, the uses and forms of oral and written transmission in daily life. To this end a double distinction is proposed between: (a) orality and literacy as social practices, and (b) speech and writing as modes of use. The first distinction is based on the observation of sociocommunicative reality and the second, on linguistic facts. Several current theoretical tendencies are examined. All perspectives that polarize the relation between oral and written language are rejected, while a position focusing on the multifactorial relati­on between the two practices within a continuum of uses and genres that rejects intrin­sic properties, both negative and positive, of these practices, is adopted. Partindo da premissa de que não e possível analisar as relações entre língua falada e língua escrita centrando-se apenas no código lingüístico, este ensaio considera a produção discursiva em seu todo como uma prática social e analisa os contextos de produção, os usos e as formas de transmissão da oralidade e da escrita na vida diária. Para isso propõe a dupla distinção entre: (a) oralidade e letramento como práticas sociais e (b)fala e escrita como modalidades de uso, recaindo a primeira na observação da realidade sociocomunicativa e, a segunda na análise de fatos lingüísticos. Identifica, assim, as diversas tendências teóricas atuais no trato da questão e postula uma perspec­tiva que recusa toda e qualquer visão dicotômica e simplista, adotando como posição adequada a relação multifatorial entre as duas práticas dentro de um contínuo de usos e gêneros textuais, negando propriedades intrínsecas, positivas ou negativas, imanentes à oralidade ou à escrita. Universidade Federal de Goiás2009-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/739610.5216/sig.v9i1.7396Signótica; Vol. 9 No. 1 (1997); 119-146Signótica; v. 9 n. 1 (1997); 119-1462316-36900103-7250reponame:Signótica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/7396/5262Marcuschi, Luiz Antônioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-26T15:02:09Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/7396Revistahttp://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/sig/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/sig/oaisignotica@gmail.com2316-36900103-7250opendoar:2024-05-21T19:57:05.540533Signótica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Oral and Written
Oralidade e escrita
title Oral and Written
spellingShingle Oral and Written
Marcuschi, Luiz Antônio
title_short Oral and Written
title_full Oral and Written
title_fullStr Oral and Written
title_full_unstemmed Oral and Written
title_sort Oral and Written
author Marcuschi, Luiz Antônio
author_facet Marcuschi, Luiz Antônio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcuschi, Luiz Antônio
description Based on the premise that it is not possible to analyze the relation between oral and written language by concentrating only on the linguistic code, this essay considers the totality of discursive production as a social practice and analyzes the contexts of production, the uses and forms of oral and written transmission in daily life. To this end a double distinction is proposed between: (a) orality and literacy as social practices, and (b) speech and writing as modes of use. The first distinction is based on the observation of sociocommunicative reality and the second, on linguistic facts. Several current theoretical tendencies are examined. All perspectives that polarize the relation between oral and written language are rejected, while a position focusing on the multifactorial relati­on between the two practices within a continuum of uses and genres that rejects intrin­sic properties, both negative and positive, of these practices, is adopted.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-09-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/7396
10.5216/sig.v9i1.7396
url https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/7396
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/sig.v9i1.7396
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/7396/5262
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signótica; Vol. 9 No. 1 (1997); 119-146
Signótica; v. 9 n. 1 (1997); 119-146
2316-3690
0103-7250
reponame:Signótica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Signótica (Online)
collection Signótica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signótica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv signotica@gmail.com
_version_ 1799875044707401728