Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martínez, Julián Tole
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Homa Publica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30554
Resumo: In the context of economic globalization there is a great propensity to conflicts or overlaps between the international agreements, of its obligations or rights and even their jurisdictions. The analysis of these phenomena becomes more complex when taking into account the current proliferation of international instruments of commercial nature (preferential agreements, free trade areas, customs unions, etc.), each with a mechanism for dispute settlement, and these international instruments can generate conflicts or overlaps with the legal framework of the WTO. With an aspect to consider, there is no hierarchical relationship of a source of legal production on another (as if it is under domestic law), unless expressly provided for in an instrument or can be deduced from implicitly its normative content through an interpretive activity. From the wide range of instruments governing international trade, this discussion will focus on the analysis of the conflict rules incorporated in the various Free Trade Agreements (FTA) concluded between Latin American countries and the United States, specifically the NAFTA, the FTA with Chile, the CAFTA-DR, the FTA with Peru, the FTA with Colombia and the FTA with Panama, also the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) of Latin American countries and the European Union, including the EPA with Mexico, the EPA with Chile and the EPA with the Andean countries, in addition will be reviewed the conflict rules of the WTO law. In the end, will conclude on the usefulness of the principle of res judicata to resolve the effects of forum shopping.
id UFJF-5_00497bee036b07cc07ac54fa5a5c7f84
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/30554
network_acronym_str UFJF-5
network_name_str Homa Publica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputesPráticas de el forum shopping entre la OMC y los TLC: el valor del principio de la cosa juzgada en la solución de controversiasPráticas do forum shopping entre a OMC e os Tratados de Livre Comércio: o valor do princípio da coisa julgada na solução de conflitosSolução de conflitosTratados de Lívre ComércioOMCForum shoppingDispute settlementFTAWTOForum shoppingSolución de controversiasTLCOMCForum shoppingIn the context of economic globalization there is a great propensity to conflicts or overlaps between the international agreements, of its obligations or rights and even their jurisdictions. The analysis of these phenomena becomes more complex when taking into account the current proliferation of international instruments of commercial nature (preferential agreements, free trade areas, customs unions, etc.), each with a mechanism for dispute settlement, and these international instruments can generate conflicts or overlaps with the legal framework of the WTO. With an aspect to consider, there is no hierarchical relationship of a source of legal production on another (as if it is under domestic law), unless expressly provided for in an instrument or can be deduced from implicitly its normative content through an interpretive activity. From the wide range of instruments governing international trade, this discussion will focus on the analysis of the conflict rules incorporated in the various Free Trade Agreements (FTA) concluded between Latin American countries and the United States, specifically the NAFTA, the FTA with Chile, the CAFTA-DR, the FTA with Peru, the FTA with Colombia and the FTA with Panama, also the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) of Latin American countries and the European Union, including the EPA with Mexico, the EPA with Chile and the EPA with the Andean countries, in addition will be reviewed the conflict rules of the WTO law. In the end, will conclude on the usefulness of the principle of res judicata to resolve the effects of forum shopping.No hay duda que en el contexto de la globalización económica existe una gran disposición a conflictos o superposiciones de instrumentos internacionales, de sus obligaciones o derechos e inclusive de sus jurisdicciones. El análisis de estos fenómenos se hace más complejo si se tiene en cuenta la actual proliferación de instrumentos internacionales de naturaleza comercial (acuerdos preferenciales, zonas de libre comercio, uniones aduaneras, etc.), cada uno, con un mecanismo de solución de controversias que puede llegar a generar conflictos o superposiciones con el régimen jurídico de la OMC. Con un aspecto a tener en cuenta, no existe una relación de jerarquía de una fuente de producción jurídica sobre otra (como en si ocurre en el Derecho interno), a menos que esté contemplada de forma expresa en un instrumento o que se pueda deducir de forma implícita de su contenido normativo por medio de una actividad interpretativa. Del amplio abanico de instrumentos que regulan el comercio internacional, esta disertación centrará su atención en el análisis de las normas de conflicto incorporadas en los diferentes tratados de libre comercio (en adelante TLC) celebrados entre países latinoamericanos y los Estados Unidos, concretamente, el TLC de América del Norte de 1994, el TLC con Chile de 2004, el TLC con la República Dominicana y Centroamérica de 2006, el TLC con Perú de 2009, el TLC con Colombia de 2012 y el TLC con Panamá de 2012, además, los Acuerdos de Asociación Económica de países latinoamericanos y la Unión Europea, entre ellos, el TLC con México en 2000, el TLC con Chile de 2005 y el TLC con los países andinos de 2013, finalmente, se incluirá en el examen las normas de conflicto del régimen jurídico de la OMC, y así se llegará a concluir la utilidad que puede tener el principio de la cosa juzgada o res judicata respecto a los efectos del fórum shopping.Não há dúvida de que, no contexto da globalização econômica, há uma grande disposição para conflitos ou sobreposição de instrumentos internacionais, suas obrigações ou direitos e até mesmo suas jurisdições. A análise destes fenômenos torna-se mais complexa se levarmos em conta a atual proliferação de instrumentos internacionais de natureza comercial (acordos preferenciais, zonas de livre comércio, uniões aduaneiras, etc.), cada um com um mecanismo de solução de controvérsias que pode até gerar conflitos ou sobreposições com o regime jurídico da OMC. Com um aspecto a ter em conta, não há hierarquia de uma fonte de produção legal sobre outra (como no caso do direito interno), a menos que esteja expressamente previsto num instrumento ou possa ser implicitamente inferido a partir do seu conteúdo normativo por meio de uma atividade interpretativa. Do amplo leque de instrumentos que regulam o comércio internacional, esta pesquisa centrará sua atenção na análise das regras de conflito incorporadas nos diferentes acordos de livre comércio (doravante TLC) celebrados entre os países latino-americanos e os Estados Unidos, especificamente o TLC norte-americano de 1994, o TLC com o Chile de 2004, o TLC com a República Dominicana e a América Central de 2006, o TLC com o Peru de 2009, o TLC com a Colômbia em 2012 e o TLC com o Panamá em 2012, além dos Acordos de Parceria Econômica dos países latino-americanos e da União Européia, incluindo o TLC com o México em 2000, o TLC com o Chile em 2005 e o TLC com os países andinos em 2013; finalmente, as regras de conflito do regime jurídico da OMC serão incluídas na revisão, e assim a utilidade do princípio do caso julgado no que diz respeito aos efeitos do forum shopping será concluída.Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora2018-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer ReviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30554Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018); e:028Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2018); e:028Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; v. 2 n. 1 (2018); e:0282526-0774reponame:Homa Publica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFspahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30554/20556Derechos de autor 2018 Homainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartínez, Julián Tole2021-12-29T18:44:28Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/30554Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMAPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/oairevista.homa@ufjf.edu.br||2526-07742526-0774opendoar:2021-12-29T18:44:28Homa Publica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
Práticas de el forum shopping entre la OMC y los TLC: el valor del principio de la cosa juzgada en la solución de controversias
Práticas do forum shopping entre a OMC e os Tratados de Livre Comércio: o valor do princípio da coisa julgada na solução de conflitos
title Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
spellingShingle Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
Martínez, Julián Tole
Solução de conflitos
Tratados de Lívre Comércio
OMC
Forum shopping
Dispute settlement
FTA
WTO
Forum shopping
Solución de controversias
TLC
OMC
Forum shopping
title_short Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
title_full Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
title_fullStr Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
title_full_unstemmed Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
title_sort Practices of the forum shopping between the WTO and the FTA: the value of the principle of res judicata in the settlement of disputes
author Martínez, Julián Tole
author_facet Martínez, Julián Tole
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martínez, Julián Tole
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Solução de conflitos
Tratados de Lívre Comércio
OMC
Forum shopping
Dispute settlement
FTA
WTO
Forum shopping
Solución de controversias
TLC
OMC
Forum shopping
topic Solução de conflitos
Tratados de Lívre Comércio
OMC
Forum shopping
Dispute settlement
FTA
WTO
Forum shopping
Solución de controversias
TLC
OMC
Forum shopping
description In the context of economic globalization there is a great propensity to conflicts or overlaps between the international agreements, of its obligations or rights and even their jurisdictions. The analysis of these phenomena becomes more complex when taking into account the current proliferation of international instruments of commercial nature (preferential agreements, free trade areas, customs unions, etc.), each with a mechanism for dispute settlement, and these international instruments can generate conflicts or overlaps with the legal framework of the WTO. With an aspect to consider, there is no hierarchical relationship of a source of legal production on another (as if it is under domestic law), unless expressly provided for in an instrument or can be deduced from implicitly its normative content through an interpretive activity. From the wide range of instruments governing international trade, this discussion will focus on the analysis of the conflict rules incorporated in the various Free Trade Agreements (FTA) concluded between Latin American countries and the United States, specifically the NAFTA, the FTA with Chile, the CAFTA-DR, the FTA with Peru, the FTA with Colombia and the FTA with Panama, also the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) of Latin American countries and the European Union, including the EPA with Mexico, the EPA with Chile and the EPA with the Andean countries, in addition will be reviewed the conflict rules of the WTO law. In the end, will conclude on the usefulness of the principle of res judicata to resolve the effects of forum shopping.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer Reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30554
url https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30554
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30554/20556
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Homa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Homa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018); e:028
Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2018); e:028
Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; v. 2 n. 1 (2018); e:028
2526-0774
reponame:Homa Publica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron:UFJF
instname_str Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron_str UFJF
institution UFJF
reponame_str Homa Publica (Online)
collection Homa Publica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Homa Publica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.homa@ufjf.edu.br||
_version_ 1808857947784085504

Registros relacionados