CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esteve Moltó, José Elías
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Homa Publica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/38708
Resumo: This analysis aims to contribute to the debate on the implementation of Chinese extractive corporations in Latin America. While the Beijing regime and partners in the region publicize that these investments are part of a supposed win-win cooperation in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative, the pattern of negative effects of these extractive activities on human rights and the environment point to a reissue of abusive practices against the affected communities, which has come to be described as a new colonialism with Chinese characteristics. At the same time, these cases only confirm the gaps in international law and the limits of the different soft-law initiatives (from the Guiding Principles to the National Action Plans) to be able to denounce the abuses of the activities of transnational corporations, and consequently, demand responsibilities.
id UFJF-5_969827c161f227e090471ee8f285592f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/38708
network_acronym_str UFJF-5
network_name_str Homa Publica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?Corporaciones transnacionales chinas y derechos humanos en América Latina: ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?Empresas transnacionais chinesas e direitos humanos na América Latina: relações win-win ou extrativismo neoliberal 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?Corporações chinesasIniciativa do Cinturão e RotaExtrativismoEmpresas transnacionais e direitos humanosTransnational companies and human rights. Extractivism. Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese corporations.Corporaciones chinasIniciativa de la Franja y la RutaExtractivismoEmpresas transnacionales y derechos humanosThis analysis aims to contribute to the debate on the implementation of Chinese extractive corporations in Latin America. While the Beijing regime and partners in the region publicize that these investments are part of a supposed win-win cooperation in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative, the pattern of negative effects of these extractive activities on human rights and the environment point to a reissue of abusive practices against the affected communities, which has come to be described as a new colonialism with Chinese characteristics. At the same time, these cases only confirm the gaps in international law and the limits of the different soft-law initiatives (from the Guiding Principles to the National Action Plans) to be able to denounce the abuses of the activities of transnational corporations, and consequently, demand responsibilities.El presente análisis pretende contribuir al debate sobre la implantación de las corporaciones extractivas chinas en América Latina. Mientras por parte del régimen de Beijing y socios en la región publicitan que estas inversiones se enmarcan en una supuesta cooperación win-win en el contexto de la Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta (Belt and Road Initiative, BRI), el patrón de los negativos efectos de estas actividades extractivas sobre los derechos humanos y el medio ambiente apuntan a una reedición de unas prácticas de abusos a las comunidades afectadas, que se ha llegado a calificar como un nuevo colonialismo con características chinas. Al mismo tiempo, estos casos no hacen sino constatar las lagunas del derecho internacional y los límites de las distintas iniciativas de soft-law (desde los Principios Rectores a los Planes de Acción Nacional) para poder denunciar los abusos de las actividades de las empresas transnacionales y en consecuencia, exigir responsabilidades.Esta análise visa contribuir para o debate sobre o estabelecimento de corporações extrativistas chinesas na América Latina. Enquanto o regime de Pequim e os parceiros da região divulgam que esses investimentos fazem parte de uma suposta cooperação win-win no contexto da Iniciativa do Cinturão e Rota (BRI), os efeitos negativos dessas atividades extrativistas sobre os direitos humanos e o meio ambiente apontam para uma reedição de práticas abusivas contra as comunidades afetadas, o que passou a ser descrito como um novo colonialismo com características chinesas. Ao mesmo tempo, esses casos apenas confirmam as lacunas do direito internacional e os limites das diferentes iniciativas de soft-law (dos Princípios Orientadores aos Planos Nacionais de Ação) para poder denunciar os abusos das atividades das empresas transnacionais, e consequentemente, exigir responsabilidades.Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora2023-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed articleArtículo evaluado por paresArtigo avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/38708Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Actividades extractivas, minería y Derechos Humanos; e:101Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2022): Actividades extractivas, minería y Derechos Humanos; e:101Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; v. 6 n. 2 (2022): Actividades extractivas, minería y Derechos Humanos; e:1012526-0774reponame:Homa Publica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFspahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/38708/26139Derechos de autor 2023 Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteve Moltó, José Elías2023-07-31T14:11:11Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/38708Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMAPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/oairevista.homa@ufjf.edu.br||2526-07742526-0774opendoar:2023-07-31T14:11:11Homa Publica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
Corporaciones transnacionales chinas y derechos humanos en América Latina: ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
Empresas transnacionais chinesas e direitos humanos na América Latina: relações win-win ou extrativismo neoliberal 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
title CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
spellingShingle CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
Esteve Moltó, José Elías
Corporações chinesas
Iniciativa do Cinturão e Rota
Extrativismo
Empresas transnacionais e direitos humanos
Transnational companies and human rights. Extractivism. Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese corporations.
Corporaciones chinas
Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta
Extractivismo
Empresas transnacionales y derechos humanos
title_short CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
title_full CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
title_fullStr CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
title_full_unstemmed CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
title_sort CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA: WIN-WIN RELATIONS OR NEOLIBERAL EXTRACTISM 2.0? ¿relaciones win-win o extractivismo neoliberal 2.0?
author Esteve Moltó, José Elías
author_facet Esteve Moltó, José Elías
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esteve Moltó, José Elías
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Corporações chinesas
Iniciativa do Cinturão e Rota
Extrativismo
Empresas transnacionais e direitos humanos
Transnational companies and human rights. Extractivism. Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese corporations.
Corporaciones chinas
Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta
Extractivismo
Empresas transnacionales y derechos humanos
topic Corporações chinesas
Iniciativa do Cinturão e Rota
Extrativismo
Empresas transnacionais e direitos humanos
Transnational companies and human rights. Extractivism. Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese corporations.
Corporaciones chinas
Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta
Extractivismo
Empresas transnacionales y derechos humanos
description This analysis aims to contribute to the debate on the implementation of Chinese extractive corporations in Latin America. While the Beijing regime and partners in the region publicize that these investments are part of a supposed win-win cooperation in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative, the pattern of negative effects of these extractive activities on human rights and the environment point to a reissue of abusive practices against the affected communities, which has come to be described as a new colonialism with Chinese characteristics. At the same time, these cases only confirm the gaps in international law and the limits of the different soft-law initiatives (from the Guiding Principles to the National Action Plans) to be able to denounce the abuses of the activities of transnational corporations, and consequently, demand responsibilities.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed article
Artículo evaluado por pares
Artigo avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/38708
url https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/38708
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/38708/26139
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2023 Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2023 Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Actividades extractivas, minería y Derechos Humanos; e:101
Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2022): Actividades extractivas, minería y Derechos Humanos; e:101
Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas; v. 6 n. 2 (2022): Actividades extractivas, minería y Derechos Humanos; e:101
2526-0774
reponame:Homa Publica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron:UFJF
instname_str Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron_str UFJF
institution UFJF
reponame_str Homa Publica (Online)
collection Homa Publica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Homa Publica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.homa@ufjf.edu.br||
_version_ 1808857947942420480

Registros relacionados