Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/article/view/31762 |
Resumo: | The process of elaboration the BNCC took place in a context of a lot of political instability and conflicts among educations specialists. These experts shared opinions and were in favor of and against the elaboration of the BNCC. One of the conflicts concerns the relationship between the curriculum and the evaluation, which seems to be characterized by an inverse and controversial logic. Based on this debate, the present study intends to present the main theoretical current that underlies the majority of Brazilian curriculuns, which are under review, due to the need to implement the BNCC. In addition, the work ends by presenting some provocations that may be the subject of future investigations. |
id |
UFJF-7_c565a64050c2fb64d4739d7c574c66c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/31762 |
network_acronym_str |
UFJF-7 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships?Avaliação, currículo e o construtivismo: quais são as relações?BNCCAvaliação em larga escalaConstrutivismoBNCCLarge-scale evaluationConstructivismThe process of elaboration the BNCC took place in a context of a lot of political instability and conflicts among educations specialists. These experts shared opinions and were in favor of and against the elaboration of the BNCC. One of the conflicts concerns the relationship between the curriculum and the evaluation, which seems to be characterized by an inverse and controversial logic. Based on this debate, the present study intends to present the main theoretical current that underlies the majority of Brazilian curriculuns, which are under review, due to the need to implement the BNCC. In addition, the work ends by presenting some provocations that may be the subject of future investigations.O processo de formulação da BNCC se deu em um contexto de muita instabilidade política e de tensionamentos e conflitos entre os especialistas do campo educacional que se posicionaram a favor e contra a sua elaboração. Dentre os vários conflitos, está o debate sobre a relação entre o currículo e a avaliação em larga escala, que parece ser caracterizada por uma lógica inversa e controversa. Partindo deste debate, o presente estudo procura apresentar a principal corrente teórica que fundamenta a maioria dos currículos dos sistemas de ensino brasileiros e que se encontra, no momento, em revisão, devido à necessidade de implementação da BNCC. O trabalho finaliza apresentando algumas provocações que podem ser objeto de investigações futuras.Centro de Políticas Públicas e Avaliação da Educação (CAEd)2020-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/article/view/3176210.34019/2237-9444.2020.v10.31762Pesquisa e Debate em Educação; v. 10 n. 2 (2020): Pesquisa e Debate em Educação ; 1274-12862237-94442237-9436reponame:Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/article/view/31762/22041Muylaert, Nairainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-02-01T03:32:34Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/31762Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDEPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/oaifrederico.braida@arquitetura.ufjf.br / revista@caed.ufjf.brhttps://doi.org/10.34019/2237-94442237-94442237-9436opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:31.046003Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? Avaliação, currículo e o construtivismo: quais são as relações? |
title |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? Muylaert, Naira BNCC Avaliação em larga escala Construtivismo BNCC Large-scale evaluation Constructivism |
title_short |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? |
title_full |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? |
title_sort |
Evaluation, curriculum and constructivism: what are the relationships? |
author |
Muylaert, Naira |
author_facet |
Muylaert, Naira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Muylaert, Naira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
BNCC Avaliação em larga escala Construtivismo BNCC Large-scale evaluation Constructivism |
topic |
BNCC Avaliação em larga escala Construtivismo BNCC Large-scale evaluation Constructivism |
description |
The process of elaboration the BNCC took place in a context of a lot of political instability and conflicts among educations specialists. These experts shared opinions and were in favor of and against the elaboration of the BNCC. One of the conflicts concerns the relationship between the curriculum and the evaluation, which seems to be characterized by an inverse and controversial logic. Based on this debate, the present study intends to present the main theoretical current that underlies the majority of Brazilian curriculuns, which are under review, due to the need to implement the BNCC. In addition, the work ends by presenting some provocations that may be the subject of future investigations. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/article/view/31762 10.34019/2237-9444.2020.v10.31762 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/article/view/31762 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34019/2237-9444.2020.v10.31762 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/RPDE/article/view/31762/22041 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Políticas Públicas e Avaliação da Educação (CAEd) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Políticas Públicas e Avaliação da Educação (CAEd) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa e Debate em Educação; v. 10 n. 2 (2020): Pesquisa e Debate em Educação ; 1274-1286 2237-9444 2237-9436 reponame:Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) instacron:UFJF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
instacron_str |
UFJF |
institution |
UFJF |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa e Debate em Educação (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
frederico.braida@arquitetura.ufjf.br / revista@caed.ufjf.br |
_version_ |
1797054123419369472 |