Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | HU Revista (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT This work analyzed the ideal number of slides needed for fecal spontaneous sedimentation technique, with the purpose to contribute in the diagnostic of stool test with low cost and higher benefice. In a study about intestinal parasite infection prevalence, the maximum number of slides analyzed was five slides per fecal sample, considered as a gold standard. Each slide was evaluated by different observers. Analyzing only one slide the enteroparasites positive frequency was less 60.0% and it was increased to 79.7% when analyzing the second slide. During the observation of the third and fourth slides the positive samples was 87.5 and 95.3, respectively. It was verify that the sensibility and specificity increased with the slides number examined and during the observation of three slides per stool sample, the sensibility was 87.5% and the specificity was 99.1%. Among the enteroparasitos, the most prevalent were hookworms and Giardia lamblia, with 13.7% for both. The analyze of only one slide reveal the major risks of false negative cases. The results finding suggest the realization of three slides per stool sample for fecal spontaneous sedimentation technique, in the attempt to increase the efficiency of the fecal diagnostic methods with low costs for the public health care. |
id |
UFJF-8_d15d3f61f9766f122e177957b3b9dfcc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/482 |
network_acronym_str |
UFJF-8 |
network_name_str |
HU Revista (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed?Validação do número de lâminas para realização do método de sedimentação espontânea das fezesDoenças Parasitárias. Diagnóstico. Saúde Pública.ABSTRACT This work analyzed the ideal number of slides needed for fecal spontaneous sedimentation technique, with the purpose to contribute in the diagnostic of stool test with low cost and higher benefice. In a study about intestinal parasite infection prevalence, the maximum number of slides analyzed was five slides per fecal sample, considered as a gold standard. Each slide was evaluated by different observers. Analyzing only one slide the enteroparasites positive frequency was less 60.0% and it was increased to 79.7% when analyzing the second slide. During the observation of the third and fourth slides the positive samples was 87.5 and 95.3, respectively. It was verify that the sensibility and specificity increased with the slides number examined and during the observation of three slides per stool sample, the sensibility was 87.5% and the specificity was 99.1%. Among the enteroparasitos, the most prevalent were hookworms and Giardia lamblia, with 13.7% for both. The analyze of only one slide reveal the major risks of false negative cases. The results finding suggest the realization of three slides per stool sample for fecal spontaneous sedimentation technique, in the attempt to increase the efficiency of the fecal diagnostic methods with low costs for the public health care.Este estudo avaliou o número satisfatório de lâminas a serem examinadas pela técnica de sedimentação espontânea das fezes ou de Hoffmann, Pons e Janer (HPJ), com o intuito de contribuir para a eficiência no diagnóstico de exames coproparasitológicos no diagnóstico de parasitoses, objetivando menor custo e maior benefício. A partir de um estudo da prevalência de enteroparasitoses, cujo cálculo amostral aleatório teve como base toda a população residente no município de Piau – Minas Gerais, foram investigadas 925 amostras. O número máximo de lâminas examinadas para cada amostra de fezes foi de cinco, considerado como padrão-ouro. Cada lâmina foi avaliada por cinco examinadores diferentes. Na análise de apenas uma lâmina, a frequência de positividade para enteroparasitos foi inferior a 60% e aumentou para 79,7% na análise de uma segunda lâmina. Na observação da terceira e quarta lâminas, a positividade das amostras foi 87,5% e 95,3%, respectivamente. Verificou-se que a sensibilidade e especificidade aumentaram com o número de lâminas examinadas e que na observação de três lâminas por amostra, a sensibilidade foi de 87,5% e a especificidade de 99,1%. Entre os enteroparasitos, os ancilostomídeos e Giardia lamblia foram os mais prevalentes, representando 13,7% de positividade para ambos. A análise de apenas uma lâmina por amostra elevou o risco de resultado falso negativo. Os resultados encontrados sugerem a realização de três lâminas por amostra pela técnica do HPJ na tentativa de aumentar a acurácia do método diagnóstico com custos sustentáveis para a gestão junto ao Sistema Único de Saúde.Editora UFJF2009-11-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtOrPesquisa Experimentalapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482HU Revista; v. 35 n. 2 (2009)1982-80470103-3123reponame:HU Revista (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482/242https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482/15007https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482/15010Tibiriça, Sandra Helena CerratoAbramo, ClariceSimões, Alexandre SobreiraPinheiro, Izabella de OliveiraRibeiro, Luiz CláudioCoimbra, Elaine Soaresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-04T03:53:17Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/482Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/oairevista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br1982-80470103-3123opendoar:2023-05-04T03:53:17HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? Validação do número de lâminas para realização do método de sedimentação espontânea das fezes |
title |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? |
spellingShingle |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? Tibiriça, Sandra Helena Cerrato Doenças Parasitárias. Diagnóstico. Saúde Pública. |
title_short |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? |
title_full |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? |
title_fullStr |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? |
title_sort |
Faecal Spontaneous Sedimentation Method: how many slides are really needed? |
author |
Tibiriça, Sandra Helena Cerrato |
author_facet |
Tibiriça, Sandra Helena Cerrato Abramo, Clarice Simões, Alexandre Sobreira Pinheiro, Izabella de Oliveira Ribeiro, Luiz Cláudio Coimbra, Elaine Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Abramo, Clarice Simões, Alexandre Sobreira Pinheiro, Izabella de Oliveira Ribeiro, Luiz Cláudio Coimbra, Elaine Soares |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tibiriça, Sandra Helena Cerrato Abramo, Clarice Simões, Alexandre Sobreira Pinheiro, Izabella de Oliveira Ribeiro, Luiz Cláudio Coimbra, Elaine Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Doenças Parasitárias. Diagnóstico. Saúde Pública. |
topic |
Doenças Parasitárias. Diagnóstico. Saúde Pública. |
description |
ABSTRACT This work analyzed the ideal number of slides needed for fecal spontaneous sedimentation technique, with the purpose to contribute in the diagnostic of stool test with low cost and higher benefice. In a study about intestinal parasite infection prevalence, the maximum number of slides analyzed was five slides per fecal sample, considered as a gold standard. Each slide was evaluated by different observers. Analyzing only one slide the enteroparasites positive frequency was less 60.0% and it was increased to 79.7% when analyzing the second slide. During the observation of the third and fourth slides the positive samples was 87.5 and 95.3, respectively. It was verify that the sensibility and specificity increased with the slides number examined and during the observation of three slides per stool sample, the sensibility was 87.5% and the specificity was 99.1%. Among the enteroparasitos, the most prevalent were hookworms and Giardia lamblia, with 13.7% for both. The analyze of only one slide reveal the major risks of false negative cases. The results finding suggest the realization of three slides per stool sample for fecal spontaneous sedimentation technique, in the attempt to increase the efficiency of the fecal diagnostic methods with low costs for the public health care. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-11-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion ArtOr Pesquisa Experimental |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482/242 https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482/15007 https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/482/15010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword application/msword |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFJF |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFJF |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
HU Revista; v. 35 n. 2 (2009) 1982-8047 0103-3123 reponame:HU Revista (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) instacron:UFJF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
instacron_str |
UFJF |
institution |
UFJF |
reponame_str |
HU Revista (Online) |
collection |
HU Revista (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br |
_version_ |
1796798240072400896 |