Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa,Elias Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Samuel-Rosa,Alessandro, Anjos,Lúcia Helena Cunha dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000600608
Resumo: ABSTRACT Digital elevation models (DEM) used in digital soil mapping (DSM) are commonly selected based on measures and indicators (quality criteria) that are thought to reflect how well a given DEM represents the terrain surface. The hypothesis is that the more accurate a DEM, the more accurate will be the DSM predictions. The objective of this study was to assess different criteria to identify the DEM that delivers the most accurate DSM predictions. A set of 10 criteria were used to evaluate the quality of nine DEMs constructed with different data sources, processing routines and three resolutions (5, 20, and 30 m). Multinomial logistic regression models were calibrated using 157 soil observations and terrain attributes derived from each DEM. Soil class predictions were validated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Results showed that, for each resolution, the quality criteria are useful to identify the DEM that more accurately represents the terrain surface. However, for all three resolutions, the most accurate DEM did not produce the most accurate DSM predictions. With the 20-m resolution DEMs, DSM predictions were five percentage points less accurate when using the more accurate DEM. The 5-m resolution was the most accurate DEM overall and resulted in DSM predictions with 44% accuracy; this value was equal to that obtained with two coarser resolution, lower accuracy DEMs. Thus, identifying the truly best DEM for DSM requires assessment of the accuracy of DSM predictions using some form of external validation, because not necessarily the most accurate DEM will produce the best DSM predictions.
id UFLA-2_10ac364127047d9a5750de0e7b67a1bf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-70542018000600608
network_acronym_str UFLA-2
network_name_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracyMultinomial logistic regressionpredictor variablescollinearityShannon entropyABSTRACT Digital elevation models (DEM) used in digital soil mapping (DSM) are commonly selected based on measures and indicators (quality criteria) that are thought to reflect how well a given DEM represents the terrain surface. The hypothesis is that the more accurate a DEM, the more accurate will be the DSM predictions. The objective of this study was to assess different criteria to identify the DEM that delivers the most accurate DSM predictions. A set of 10 criteria were used to evaluate the quality of nine DEMs constructed with different data sources, processing routines and three resolutions (5, 20, and 30 m). Multinomial logistic regression models were calibrated using 157 soil observations and terrain attributes derived from each DEM. Soil class predictions were validated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Results showed that, for each resolution, the quality criteria are useful to identify the DEM that more accurately represents the terrain surface. However, for all three resolutions, the most accurate DEM did not produce the most accurate DSM predictions. With the 20-m resolution DEMs, DSM predictions were five percentage points less accurate when using the more accurate DEM. The 5-m resolution was the most accurate DEM overall and resulted in DSM predictions with 44% accuracy; this value was equal to that obtained with two coarser resolution, lower accuracy DEMs. Thus, identifying the truly best DEM for DSM requires assessment of the accuracy of DSM predictions using some form of external validation, because not necessarily the most accurate DEM will produce the best DSM predictions.Editora da UFLA2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000600608Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.6 2018reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA10.1590/1413-70542018426027418info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta,Elias MendesSamuel-Rosa,AlessandroAnjos,Lúcia Helena Cunha doseng2019-01-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-70542018000600608Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/cagroPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br1981-18291413-7054opendoar:2022-11-22T16:31:36.685061Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
title Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
spellingShingle Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
Costa,Elias Mendes
Multinomial logistic regression
predictor variables
collinearity
Shannon entropy
title_short Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
title_full Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
title_fullStr Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
title_sort Digital elevation model quality on digital soil mapping prediction accuracy
author Costa,Elias Mendes
author_facet Costa,Elias Mendes
Samuel-Rosa,Alessandro
Anjos,Lúcia Helena Cunha dos
author_role author
author2 Samuel-Rosa,Alessandro
Anjos,Lúcia Helena Cunha dos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Elias Mendes
Samuel-Rosa,Alessandro
Anjos,Lúcia Helena Cunha dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multinomial logistic regression
predictor variables
collinearity
Shannon entropy
topic Multinomial logistic regression
predictor variables
collinearity
Shannon entropy
description ABSTRACT Digital elevation models (DEM) used in digital soil mapping (DSM) are commonly selected based on measures and indicators (quality criteria) that are thought to reflect how well a given DEM represents the terrain surface. The hypothesis is that the more accurate a DEM, the more accurate will be the DSM predictions. The objective of this study was to assess different criteria to identify the DEM that delivers the most accurate DSM predictions. A set of 10 criteria were used to evaluate the quality of nine DEMs constructed with different data sources, processing routines and three resolutions (5, 20, and 30 m). Multinomial logistic regression models were calibrated using 157 soil observations and terrain attributes derived from each DEM. Soil class predictions were validated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Results showed that, for each resolution, the quality criteria are useful to identify the DEM that more accurately represents the terrain surface. However, for all three resolutions, the most accurate DEM did not produce the most accurate DSM predictions. With the 20-m resolution DEMs, DSM predictions were five percentage points less accurate when using the more accurate DEM. The 5-m resolution was the most accurate DEM overall and resulted in DSM predictions with 44% accuracy; this value was equal to that obtained with two coarser resolution, lower accuracy DEMs. Thus, identifying the truly best DEM for DSM requires assessment of the accuracy of DSM predictions using some form of external validation, because not necessarily the most accurate DEM will produce the best DSM predictions.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000600608
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000600608
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-70542018426027418
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.6 2018
reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
collection Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874970789085184