Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Coffee Science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480 |
Resumo: | Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) is a worldwide coffee pest. It is the most important pest to Coffea canephora Pierre & Froehner and the second to Coffea arabica L. in Brazil. The chemical control is the most efficient method to its control and the endosulfan is the most efficient chemical. This ciclodieno chlorinated compound is permitted in Brazil until July 2013. The objective of this study was to observe the efficiency of the cyantraniliprole 100 OD insecticide in spraying system to coffee berry borer control compared to the endosulfan 350 EC. The cyantraniliprole was sprayed at doses of 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 liters c.p. /ha and endosulfan at 1.5 and 2.0 liters c.p. /ha. Two applications with 30 days interval were used at the “transit” time of the berry borer. Efficiency of the products was evaluated by counting the number of the living borer inside of damaged fruits in a liter of coffee (around 700 fruits) collected randomly in plots. All treatments differed from the control treatment but did not differ among them. Control treatment showed 35.7% of living borer, while doses of 1.75 and 2.0 liters of cyantraniliprole/ha, 3.5 and 4.0%, respectively. Treatment with endosulfan at 1.5 and 2.0 liters/ha showed 1.0 and 0.8% of living borer, respectively, and did not differ from cyantraniliprole. The results indicate that the cyantraniliprole 100 OD is effective in controlling H. hampei at doses between 1.75 and 2.0 liters /ha with two spraying. |
id |
UFLA-4_6c57aeab98bc5fe237916ed2122f1471 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/480 |
network_acronym_str |
UFLA-4 |
network_name_str |
Coffee Science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with CyantranilipoleControle químico de broca-do-café com CyantraniliproleHypothenemus hampeiCoffea spp.rianodineCyazypyrTMBeneviaTMHypothenemus hampeiCoffea spp.rianodinaCyazypyrTMBeneviaTMHypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) is a worldwide coffee pest. It is the most important pest to Coffea canephora Pierre & Froehner and the second to Coffea arabica L. in Brazil. The chemical control is the most efficient method to its control and the endosulfan is the most efficient chemical. This ciclodieno chlorinated compound is permitted in Brazil until July 2013. The objective of this study was to observe the efficiency of the cyantraniliprole 100 OD insecticide in spraying system to coffee berry borer control compared to the endosulfan 350 EC. The cyantraniliprole was sprayed at doses of 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 liters c.p. /ha and endosulfan at 1.5 and 2.0 liters c.p. /ha. Two applications with 30 days interval were used at the “transit” time of the berry borer. Efficiency of the products was evaluated by counting the number of the living borer inside of damaged fruits in a liter of coffee (around 700 fruits) collected randomly in plots. All treatments differed from the control treatment but did not differ among them. Control treatment showed 35.7% of living borer, while doses of 1.75 and 2.0 liters of cyantraniliprole/ha, 3.5 and 4.0%, respectively. Treatment with endosulfan at 1.5 and 2.0 liters/ha showed 1.0 and 0.8% of living borer, respectively, and did not differ from cyantraniliprole. The results indicate that the cyantraniliprole 100 OD is effective in controlling H. hampei at doses between 1.75 and 2.0 liters /ha with two spraying.Hypothenemus hampei é praga da cafeicultura mundial. É considerada a primeira em importância para Coffea canephora e a segunda para C. arabica no Brasil. O método de controle mais eficiente é o químico, e o produto considerado mais eficaz é o endosulfan, de uso permitido no Brasil até julho de 2013. Considerando esse fato, objetivou-se, neste trabalho, conhecer a eficiência do inseticida cyantraniliprole 100 OD, em pulverização no controle da broca, em comparação com o inseticida endosulfan 350 EC. O cyantraniliprole foi aplicado nas doses de 0,75; 1,0; 1,25; 1,5; 1,75; 2,0 e o endosulfan a 1,5 e 2,0 litros p.c. /hectare, ambos com duas aplicações espaçadas de 30 dias na época de “trânsito” da broca. A avaliação da eficiência dos produtos foi feita com a contagem de brocas vivas no interior de frutos broqueados, contidos em um litro de café (cerca de 700 frutos), colhidos ao acaso em cada parcela. Todos os tratamentos diferiram do tratamento testemunha e foram iguais entre si. A testemunha apresentou 35,7% de brocas vivas, enquanto que as doses de 1,75 e 2,0 litros por hectare de cyantraniliprole apresentaram 3,5 e 4,0% de brocas vivas, respectivamente. Os tratamentos com endosulfan a 1,5 e 2,0 litros por hectare, apresentaram 1,0 e 0,8% de brocas vivas, respectivamente, não diferindo estatisticamente do cyantraniliprole. Os resultados permitem concluir que o cyantraniliprole 100 OD é eficiente no controle de H. hampei nas dosagens entre 1,75 e 2,0 litros/ha, em duas pulverizações.Editora UFLA2014-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfimage/tiffhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2013); 404-410Coffee Science; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2013); 404-410Coffee Science; v. 8 n. 4 (2013); 404-4101984-3909reponame:Coffee Science (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAporhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480/pdf_58https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480/1122Copyright (c) 2014 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909https://creativecommons.org/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Souza, Júlio CésarReis, Paulo RebellesSilva, Rogério AntonioCarvalho, Thiago Alves Ferreira dePereira, Andreane Bastos2014-03-31T13:20:27Zoai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/480Revistahttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/CoffeesciencePUBhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/oaicoffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com1984-39091809-6875opendoar:2024-05-21T19:53:42.480543Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole Controle químico de broca-do-café com Cyantraniliprole |
title |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole |
spellingShingle |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole de Souza, Júlio César Hypothenemus hampei Coffea spp. rianodine CyazypyrTM BeneviaTM Hypothenemus hampei Coffea spp. rianodina CyazypyrTM BeneviaTM |
title_short |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole |
title_full |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole |
title_fullStr |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole |
title_sort |
Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with Cyantranilipole |
author |
de Souza, Júlio César |
author_facet |
de Souza, Júlio César Reis, Paulo Rebelles Silva, Rogério Antonio Carvalho, Thiago Alves Ferreira de Pereira, Andreane Bastos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis, Paulo Rebelles Silva, Rogério Antonio Carvalho, Thiago Alves Ferreira de Pereira, Andreane Bastos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Souza, Júlio César Reis, Paulo Rebelles Silva, Rogério Antonio Carvalho, Thiago Alves Ferreira de Pereira, Andreane Bastos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hypothenemus hampei Coffea spp. rianodine CyazypyrTM BeneviaTM Hypothenemus hampei Coffea spp. rianodina CyazypyrTM BeneviaTM |
topic |
Hypothenemus hampei Coffea spp. rianodine CyazypyrTM BeneviaTM Hypothenemus hampei Coffea spp. rianodina CyazypyrTM BeneviaTM |
description |
Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) is a worldwide coffee pest. It is the most important pest to Coffea canephora Pierre & Froehner and the second to Coffea arabica L. in Brazil. The chemical control is the most efficient method to its control and the endosulfan is the most efficient chemical. This ciclodieno chlorinated compound is permitted in Brazil until July 2013. The objective of this study was to observe the efficiency of the cyantraniliprole 100 OD insecticide in spraying system to coffee berry borer control compared to the endosulfan 350 EC. The cyantraniliprole was sprayed at doses of 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 liters c.p. /ha and endosulfan at 1.5 and 2.0 liters c.p. /ha. Two applications with 30 days interval were used at the “transit” time of the berry borer. Efficiency of the products was evaluated by counting the number of the living borer inside of damaged fruits in a liter of coffee (around 700 fruits) collected randomly in plots. All treatments differed from the control treatment but did not differ among them. Control treatment showed 35.7% of living borer, while doses of 1.75 and 2.0 liters of cyantraniliprole/ha, 3.5 and 4.0%, respectively. Treatment with endosulfan at 1.5 and 2.0 liters/ha showed 1.0 and 0.8% of living borer, respectively, and did not differ from cyantraniliprole. The results indicate that the cyantraniliprole 100 OD is effective in controlling H. hampei at doses between 1.75 and 2.0 liters /ha with two spraying. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480 |
url |
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480/pdf_58 https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/480/1122 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909 https://creativecommons.org/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909 https://creativecommons.org/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf image/tiff |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFLA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFLA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2013); 404-410 Coffee Science; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2013); 404-410 Coffee Science; v. 8 n. 4 (2013); 404-410 1984-3909 reponame:Coffee Science (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) instacron:UFLA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
instacron_str |
UFLA |
institution |
UFLA |
reponame_str |
Coffee Science (Online) |
collection |
Coffee Science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1799874919545176064 |