Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Bruno Batista
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Nunes, Cleiton Antônio, Jesus Souza, Antonio Jackson, Montanari, Fernanda Faria, Silva, Virgílio Anastácio da, Viana Madeira, Raul Antônio, Piza, Clovis de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Coffee Science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168
Resumo: The different types of post-harvest processing employed in coffee fruits may yield different beverages, whose sensory profile depends on environmental factors and management in the production process. All the processes involved in coffee production, from soil and climatic characteristics of the growing area to the adopted storage system, interfere in the coffee beverage quality. The objective of this research was to describe the sensory profile of different coffee varieties processed by dry (natural) and wet (demucilated), after one year of storage. Were evaluated sensorially four coffee cultivars (Red Catuaí IAC 144, Iapar 59, Yellow Bourbon e Paraíso MG H 419-1), of Coffea arabica L. of the 2012/2013 season with the completion of two post-harvest processing (natural and demucilated cherry) after one year of storage. Sensory analysis was performed by two accredited tasters and enabled through the protocol of the Specialty Coffee Association of America - SCAA. Cultivars behave differently in quality according to the adopted process. Coffees of the natural processing stood out in most sensory attributes evaluated in relation to demucilated coffees after one year of storage. The Red Catuaí IAC 144 and Iapar 59 showed better quality when subjected to natural processing. Already in demucilated coffees, highest scores were awarded the Yellow Bourbon cultivars and Paraíso.
id UFLA-4_769623979281f23cafeeb34c48e64b65
oai_identifier_str oai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/1168
network_acronym_str UFLA-4
network_name_str Coffee Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storagePerfil sensorial de cultivares de café processados por via seca e via úmida após armazenamentoCoffea arabicaCoffee qualityPost-harvestPrincipal component analysisCoffea arabicaqualidade de caféPós-colheitaAnálise de componentes principaisThe different types of post-harvest processing employed in coffee fruits may yield different beverages, whose sensory profile depends on environmental factors and management in the production process. All the processes involved in coffee production, from soil and climatic characteristics of the growing area to the adopted storage system, interfere in the coffee beverage quality. The objective of this research was to describe the sensory profile of different coffee varieties processed by dry (natural) and wet (demucilated), after one year of storage. Were evaluated sensorially four coffee cultivars (Red Catuaí IAC 144, Iapar 59, Yellow Bourbon e Paraíso MG H 419-1), of Coffea arabica L. of the 2012/2013 season with the completion of two post-harvest processing (natural and demucilated cherry) after one year of storage. Sensory analysis was performed by two accredited tasters and enabled through the protocol of the Specialty Coffee Association of America - SCAA. Cultivars behave differently in quality according to the adopted process. Coffees of the natural processing stood out in most sensory attributes evaluated in relation to demucilated coffees after one year of storage. The Red Catuaí IAC 144 and Iapar 59 showed better quality when subjected to natural processing. Already in demucilated coffees, highest scores were awarded the Yellow Bourbon cultivars and Paraíso.Os diferentes tipos de processamentos pós-colheita empregados nos frutos de café podem originar diferentes bebidas, cujo perfil sensorial depende de fatores ambientais e do manejo no processo de produção. Todos os processos envolvidos na produção de café, desde as características edafoclimáticas da área de cultivo até o sistema de armazenamento adotado, interferem na qualidade de bebida do café. Objetivou-se neste trabalho descrever o perfil sensorial de diferentes cultivares de café processados por via seca (natural) e via úmida (desmucilado), após um ano de armazenamento. Foram avaliados sensorialmente quatro cultivares de café (Catuaí Vermelho IAC 144, Iapar 59, Bourbon Amarelo e Paraíso MG H 419-1), da espécie Coffea arabica L. da safra de 2012/2013, com a realização de dois processamentos pós-colheita (natural e cereja desmucilado) após um ano de armazenamento. A análise sensorial foi realizada por dois provadores credenciados e habilitados por meio do protocolo da Specialty Coffee Association of America – SCAA. As cultivares se comportam de maneira diferenciada na qualidade em função do processamento adotado. Os cafés do processamento natural se destacaram na maioria dos atributos sensoriais avaliados em relação aos cafés desmucilados após um ano de armazenamento. As cultivares Catuaí Vermelho IAC 144 e Iapar 59 apresentaram melhor qualidade quando submetidas ao processamento natural. Já nos cafés desmucilados, maiores notas foram atribuídas às cultivares Bourbon Amarelo e Paraíso.Editora UFLA2017-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/mswordapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2017); 148-155Coffee Science; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2017); 148-155Coffee Science; v. 12 n. 2 (2017); 148-1551984-3909reponame:Coffee Science (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAporhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/pdf_1168_2https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/1650https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/1651https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/1652Copyright (c) 2017 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909https://creativecommons.org/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Bruno BatistaNunes, Cleiton AntônioJesus Souza, Antonio JacksonMontanari, Fernanda FariaSilva, Virgílio Anastácio daViana Madeira, Raul AntônioPiza, Clovis de2017-06-06T13:18:59Zoai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/1168Revistahttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/CoffeesciencePUBhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/oaicoffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com1984-39091809-6875opendoar:2024-05-21T19:53:58.519871Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
Perfil sensorial de cultivares de café processados por via seca e via úmida após armazenamento
title Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
spellingShingle Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
Ribeiro, Bruno Batista
Coffea arabica
Coffee quality
Post-harvest
Principal component analysis
Coffea arabica
qualidade de café
Pós-colheita
Análise de componentes principais
title_short Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
title_full Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
title_fullStr Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
title_full_unstemmed Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
title_sort Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage
author Ribeiro, Bruno Batista
author_facet Ribeiro, Bruno Batista
Nunes, Cleiton Antônio
Jesus Souza, Antonio Jackson
Montanari, Fernanda Faria
Silva, Virgílio Anastácio da
Viana Madeira, Raul Antônio
Piza, Clovis de
author_role author
author2 Nunes, Cleiton Antônio
Jesus Souza, Antonio Jackson
Montanari, Fernanda Faria
Silva, Virgílio Anastácio da
Viana Madeira, Raul Antônio
Piza, Clovis de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Bruno Batista
Nunes, Cleiton Antônio
Jesus Souza, Antonio Jackson
Montanari, Fernanda Faria
Silva, Virgílio Anastácio da
Viana Madeira, Raul Antônio
Piza, Clovis de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coffea arabica
Coffee quality
Post-harvest
Principal component analysis
Coffea arabica
qualidade de café
Pós-colheita
Análise de componentes principais
topic Coffea arabica
Coffee quality
Post-harvest
Principal component analysis
Coffea arabica
qualidade de café
Pós-colheita
Análise de componentes principais
description The different types of post-harvest processing employed in coffee fruits may yield different beverages, whose sensory profile depends on environmental factors and management in the production process. All the processes involved in coffee production, from soil and climatic characteristics of the growing area to the adopted storage system, interfere in the coffee beverage quality. The objective of this research was to describe the sensory profile of different coffee varieties processed by dry (natural) and wet (demucilated), after one year of storage. Were evaluated sensorially four coffee cultivars (Red Catuaí IAC 144, Iapar 59, Yellow Bourbon e Paraíso MG H 419-1), of Coffea arabica L. of the 2012/2013 season with the completion of two post-harvest processing (natural and demucilated cherry) after one year of storage. Sensory analysis was performed by two accredited tasters and enabled through the protocol of the Specialty Coffee Association of America - SCAA. Cultivars behave differently in quality according to the adopted process. Coffees of the natural processing stood out in most sensory attributes evaluated in relation to demucilated coffees after one year of storage. The Red Catuaí IAC 144 and Iapar 59 showed better quality when subjected to natural processing. Already in demucilated coffees, highest scores were awarded the Yellow Bourbon cultivars and Paraíso.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168
url https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/pdf_1168_2
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/1650
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/1651
https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/1168/1652
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909
https://creativecommons.org/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909
https://creativecommons.org/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/msword
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2017); 148-155
Coffee Science; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2017); 148-155
Coffee Science; v. 12 n. 2 (2017); 148-155
1984-3909
reponame:Coffee Science (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Coffee Science (Online)
collection Coffee Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com
_version_ 1799874920955510784