Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aparecida dos Santos, Gislene
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: de Souza Dias Junior, Moacir, Tácito Gontijo Guimarães, Paulo, Sant’Anna Moreira Pais, Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Coffee Science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/335
Resumo: The objectives of this work were: a) to develop bearing capacity models for a Yellow Red Latossol cultivated with coffee, in function of the associated methods of weed control, pre-consolidation pressure and moisture; b) to identify, through these models, the weed control method most resistant and most susceptible to soil compaction between the rows and in the traffic lines. The experiment was set up at the EPAMIG Experimental Farm in Patrocínio, Minas Gerais state, in a coffee field (Coffea arabica L.). The methods of weed control were: between the rows: rotary tiller, disk harrow, were mower and no weeding (control). In each management system, 15 samples were collected at 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm depths (totalizing 315 samples) to generate the bearing capacity model both between the lines and in the traffic lines, except for the control treatment, where sampling was done only between the lines. To obtain the bearing capacity models, the undisturbed soil samples with different moisture contents were subjected to uni-axial compaction. Between the rows, the rotary tiller and were mowers, at 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm, promoted soil compaction, while the grade harrow promoted a relief of the soil’s mechanical resistance at the same depths. In the traffic line, the rotary tiller, at 0-3 cm, was the method of weed control most susceptible to compaction; at 10-13 cm the rotary tiller, disk harrow and were mower promoted soil compaction; at 25-28 cm a higher susceptibility was observed with the were mower.
id UFLA-4_98ab490d66e4b97c6072bc93fe354dcb
oai_identifier_str oai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/335
network_acronym_str UFLA-4
network_name_str Coffee Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee fieldSuscetibilidade à compactação de um latossolo vemermelho-amarelo submetido a diferentes métodos de controle de plantas invasoras, na cultura cafeeiraManagementbearing capacitytraffic lineManejocapacidade de suporte de cargalinha de tráfegoThe objectives of this work were: a) to develop bearing capacity models for a Yellow Red Latossol cultivated with coffee, in function of the associated methods of weed control, pre-consolidation pressure and moisture; b) to identify, through these models, the weed control method most resistant and most susceptible to soil compaction between the rows and in the traffic lines. The experiment was set up at the EPAMIG Experimental Farm in Patrocínio, Minas Gerais state, in a coffee field (Coffea arabica L.). The methods of weed control were: between the rows: rotary tiller, disk harrow, were mower and no weeding (control). In each management system, 15 samples were collected at 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm depths (totalizing 315 samples) to generate the bearing capacity model both between the lines and in the traffic lines, except for the control treatment, where sampling was done only between the lines. To obtain the bearing capacity models, the undisturbed soil samples with different moisture contents were subjected to uni-axial compaction. Between the rows, the rotary tiller and were mowers, at 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm, promoted soil compaction, while the grade harrow promoted a relief of the soil’s mechanical resistance at the same depths. In the traffic line, the rotary tiller, at 0-3 cm, was the method of weed control most susceptible to compaction; at 10-13 cm the rotary tiller, disk harrow and were mower promoted soil compaction; at 25-28 cm a higher susceptibility was observed with the were mower. Objetivou-se, neste estudo: a) desenvolver modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga (CSC), para um LVA cultivado com cafeeiro, em função dos métodos associados de controle de plantas invasoras, pressão de preconsolidação e umidade b) identificar, através do uso desses modelos, o método de controle mais resistente e mais suscetível à compactação, nas entrelinhas (EL) e linhas de tráfego (LT). O estudo foi conduzido na Fazenda Experimental da EPAMIG de Patrocínio MG, em uma lavoura cafeeira (Coffea arabica L.). Os métodos de controle utilizados foram: nas entrelinhas - enxada rotativa, grade de disco, roçadora e sem capina (testemunha). Para cada condição de manejo, coletou-se nas profundidades 0-3, 10-13 e 25-28 cm, 15 amostras para gerar o modelo de CSC, tanto nas EL como nas LT, totalizando 315 amostras, com exceção do método sem capina, em que foi realizado apenas nas entrelinhas. Para a obtenção dos modelos, as amostras com diferentes umidades foram submetidas ao ensaio de compressão. Nas EL, a enxada rotativa, roçadora e grade de discos nas profundidades 0-3, 10-13 e 25-28 cm promoveram compactação do solo, enquanto que a grade de discos, nas mesmas profundidades, proporcionou um alívio da resistência mecânica do solo. Na LT, como método de controle a enxada rotativa, na profundidade de 0-3 cm foi o método de controle mais susceptível à compactação do solo; na profundidade 10-13 cm, quando foi utilizada a enxada rotativa, a grade de discos e a roçadora promoveram compactação do solo; na profundidade 25-28 cm, uma maior suscetibilidade à compactação foi promovida quando utilizou-se a roçadora.Editora UFLA2011-03-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/335Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2010); 123-136Coffee Science; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2010); 123-136Coffee Science; v. 5 n. 2 (2010); 123-1361984-3909reponame:Coffee Science (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAporhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/335/pdfCopyright (c) 2011 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909https://creativecommons.org/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAparecida dos Santos, Gislenede Souza Dias Junior, MoacirTácito Gontijo Guimarães, PauloSant’Anna Moreira Pais, Paula2013-02-24T13:55:25Zoai:coffeescience.ufla.br:article/335Revistahttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/CoffeesciencePUBhttps://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/oaicoffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com1984-39091809-6875opendoar:2024-05-21T19:53:37.694495Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
Suscetibilidade à compactação de um latossolo vemermelho-amarelo submetido a diferentes métodos de controle de plantas invasoras, na cultura cafeeira
title Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
spellingShingle Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
Aparecida dos Santos, Gislene
Management
bearing capacity
traffic line
Manejo
capacidade de suporte de carga
linha de tráfego
title_short Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
title_full Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
title_fullStr Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
title_full_unstemmed Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
title_sort Compaction susceptibility of a yellow-red latossol subjected to different methods of weed control in a coffee field
author Aparecida dos Santos, Gislene
author_facet Aparecida dos Santos, Gislene
de Souza Dias Junior, Moacir
Tácito Gontijo Guimarães, Paulo
Sant’Anna Moreira Pais, Paula
author_role author
author2 de Souza Dias Junior, Moacir
Tácito Gontijo Guimarães, Paulo
Sant’Anna Moreira Pais, Paula
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aparecida dos Santos, Gislene
de Souza Dias Junior, Moacir
Tácito Gontijo Guimarães, Paulo
Sant’Anna Moreira Pais, Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Management
bearing capacity
traffic line
Manejo
capacidade de suporte de carga
linha de tráfego
topic Management
bearing capacity
traffic line
Manejo
capacidade de suporte de carga
linha de tráfego
description The objectives of this work were: a) to develop bearing capacity models for a Yellow Red Latossol cultivated with coffee, in function of the associated methods of weed control, pre-consolidation pressure and moisture; b) to identify, through these models, the weed control method most resistant and most susceptible to soil compaction between the rows and in the traffic lines. The experiment was set up at the EPAMIG Experimental Farm in Patrocínio, Minas Gerais state, in a coffee field (Coffea arabica L.). The methods of weed control were: between the rows: rotary tiller, disk harrow, were mower and no weeding (control). In each management system, 15 samples were collected at 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm depths (totalizing 315 samples) to generate the bearing capacity model both between the lines and in the traffic lines, except for the control treatment, where sampling was done only between the lines. To obtain the bearing capacity models, the undisturbed soil samples with different moisture contents were subjected to uni-axial compaction. Between the rows, the rotary tiller and were mowers, at 0-3, 10-13 and 25-28 cm, promoted soil compaction, while the grade harrow promoted a relief of the soil’s mechanical resistance at the same depths. In the traffic line, the rotary tiller, at 0-3 cm, was the method of weed control most susceptible to compaction; at 10-13 cm the rotary tiller, disk harrow and were mower promoted soil compaction; at 25-28 cm a higher susceptibility was observed with the were mower.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-03-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/335
url https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/335
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/335/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909
https://creativecommons.org/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909
https://creativecommons.org/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2010); 123-136
Coffee Science; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2010); 123-136
Coffee Science; v. 5 n. 2 (2010); 123-136
1984-3909
reponame:Coffee Science (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Coffee Science (Online)
collection Coffee Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coffee Science (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coffeescience@dag.ufla.br||coffeescience@dag.ufla.br|| alvaro-cozadi@hotmail.com
_version_ 1799874919006208000