Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cecchin, Daiane
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Campos, Alessandro T., Cruz, Vasco F. da, Sousa, Francine A., Amaral, Pedro I. S., Yanagi Junior, Tadayuki
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29871
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.
id UFLA_06eb58e56aba20f00764bc8e9d0e8e2c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/29871
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologiesQualidade do ar em instalações para suínos em crescimento e terminação com diferentes tipologias construtivasConstruções ruraisInstalações para suínosComforto animalBem-estar animalGasesPressão sonoraRural constructionsSwine installationsAnimal comfortAnimal welfareGas concentrationSound pressureThe objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a concentração de gases em três instalações de crescimento e terminação para suínos, com tipologias construtivas diferentes no que tange ao piso e divisórias. Compararam-se três tratamentos: baia com lâmina d’água, baia com piso parcialmente vazado nas laterais e baia com piso parcialmente vazado nas laterais e no centro. Foram feitas medições das concentrações instantâneas de amônia (NH3, ppm) e dióxido de carbono (CO2, ppm) a nível dos animais; também foram registrados os níveis de pressão sonora (dB) a nível dos animais e a 1,50 do piso. Observou-se que a baia com lâmina d’água foi a que apresentou o maior valor médio de concentração de NH3. Apesar de haver ocorrido diferenças significativas nas concentrações de CO2, os valores encontrados estão dentro dos limites permitidos pelas normas brasileiras, presumindo-se, assim, que as instalações não ocasionam desconforto em relação aos níveis de CO2. A baia com lâmina d’água demostrou proporcionar um possível desconforto aos animais, com nível de concentração de NH3 acima de valores que já podem acarretar problemas aos animais de acordo com o preconizado pela literatura. Não foi observada influência do tipo de piso da baia sobre a pressão sonora em nenhum horário.Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)2018-08-02T19:26:18Z2018-08-02T19:26:18Z2017-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfCECCHIN, D. et al. Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v. 21, n. 5, p. 339-343, May 2017.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29871Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (AGRIAMBI)reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCecchin, DaianeCampos, Alessandro T.Cruz, Vasco F. daSousa, Francine A.Amaral, Pedro I. S.Yanagi Junior, Tadayukieng2018-08-02T19:26:18Zoai:localhost:1/29871Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2018-08-02T19:26:18Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
Qualidade do ar em instalações para suínos em crescimento e terminação com diferentes tipologias construtivas
title Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
spellingShingle Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
Cecchin, Daiane
Construções rurais
Instalações para suínos
Comforto animal
Bem-estar animal
Gases
Pressão sonora
Rural constructions
Swine installations
Animal comfort
Animal welfare
Gas concentration
Sound pressure
title_short Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_full Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_fullStr Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_full_unstemmed Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_sort Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
author Cecchin, Daiane
author_facet Cecchin, Daiane
Campos, Alessandro T.
Cruz, Vasco F. da
Sousa, Francine A.
Amaral, Pedro I. S.
Yanagi Junior, Tadayuki
author_role author
author2 Campos, Alessandro T.
Cruz, Vasco F. da
Sousa, Francine A.
Amaral, Pedro I. S.
Yanagi Junior, Tadayuki
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cecchin, Daiane
Campos, Alessandro T.
Cruz, Vasco F. da
Sousa, Francine A.
Amaral, Pedro I. S.
Yanagi Junior, Tadayuki
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Construções rurais
Instalações para suínos
Comforto animal
Bem-estar animal
Gases
Pressão sonora
Rural constructions
Swine installations
Animal comfort
Animal welfare
Gas concentration
Sound pressure
topic Construções rurais
Instalações para suínos
Comforto animal
Bem-estar animal
Gases
Pressão sonora
Rural constructions
Swine installations
Animal comfort
Animal welfare
Gas concentration
Sound pressure
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05
2018-08-02T19:26:18Z
2018-08-02T19:26:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv CECCHIN, D. et al. Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v. 21, n. 5, p. 339-343, May 2017.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29871
identifier_str_mv CECCHIN, D. et al. Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v. 21, n. 5, p. 339-343, May 2017.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29871
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (AGRIAMBI)
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1784550071063281664