Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cecchin,Daiane
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Campos,Alessandro T., Cruz,Vasco F. da, Sousa,Francine A., Amaral,Pedro I. S., Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339
Resumo: ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.
id UFCG-1_8c403d507b9f6308a4a9b983a5901860
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-43662017000500339
network_acronym_str UFCG-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologiesanimal welfarerural buildingsgas concentrationsound pressureABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.21 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n5p339-343info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCecchin,DaianeCampos,Alessandro T.Cruz,Vasco F. daSousa,Francine A.Amaral,Pedro I. S.Yanagi Junior,Tadayukieng2017-05-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662017000500339Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2017-05-16T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
spellingShingle Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
Cecchin,Daiane
animal welfare
rural buildings
gas concentration
sound pressure
title_short Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_full Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_fullStr Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_full_unstemmed Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
title_sort Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
author Cecchin,Daiane
author_facet Cecchin,Daiane
Campos,Alessandro T.
Cruz,Vasco F. da
Sousa,Francine A.
Amaral,Pedro I. S.
Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki
author_role author
author2 Campos,Alessandro T.
Cruz,Vasco F. da
Sousa,Francine A.
Amaral,Pedro I. S.
Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cecchin,Daiane
Campos,Alessandro T.
Cruz,Vasco F. da
Sousa,Francine A.
Amaral,Pedro I. S.
Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal welfare
rural buildings
gas concentration
sound pressure
topic animal welfare
rural buildings
gas concentration
sound pressure
description ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n5p339-343
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.21 n.5 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron:UFCG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron_str UFCG
institution UFCG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||agriambi@agriambi.com.br
_version_ 1750297685510848512