LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFLA |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48239 |
Resumo: | The use of digital educational resources has expanded considerably, including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the educationalmaterials used in these resources, the Microcontent (MC) format predominates, with its fragmented and small information units. So, we ask: can the LongForm (LF) format, which allows the presentation of dense and extensive content, be a viable alternative to MC, when applied to complex educational content, specific to undergraduate courses? The LF, hypothetically, can offer better support for higher distance education courses. To answer the question, an educational activity, elaborated in both formats, was applied to 67 students from a university of Minas Gerais state, in Brazil. The observation of student activity revealedtheir preferences: MC has shown to be good for building learning with smaller materials in both size and content complexity, but LF wasmore appropriatedwhen dealing with complex, dense, multimedia-requiring contents to facilitate understanding. It was confirmed that the LF presents itself as a viable alternative for online studying because it is constituted by a single virtual space where larger texts and varied multimedia resources can be inserted to enrich the educational material and to offer the fullcontent for students. |
id |
UFLA_2f4a81cdaa10f16c9ab786f28a6b58bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:1/48239 |
network_acronym_str |
UFLA |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFLA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware¿LongForm o Microcontenido? análisis de soportes para materiales didácticos digitalesMobile LearningInstructional materialsDistance EducationTecnología educativaMaterial didácticoEducación a distanciaThe use of digital educational resources has expanded considerably, including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the educationalmaterials used in these resources, the Microcontent (MC) format predominates, with its fragmented and small information units. So, we ask: can the LongForm (LF) format, which allows the presentation of dense and extensive content, be a viable alternative to MC, when applied to complex educational content, specific to undergraduate courses? The LF, hypothetically, can offer better support for higher distance education courses. To answer the question, an educational activity, elaborated in both formats, was applied to 67 students from a university of Minas Gerais state, in Brazil. The observation of student activity revealedtheir preferences: MC has shown to be good for building learning with smaller materials in both size and content complexity, but LF wasmore appropriatedwhen dealing with complex, dense, multimedia-requiring contents to facilitate understanding. It was confirmed that the LF presents itself as a viable alternative for online studying because it is constituted by a single virtual space where larger texts and varied multimedia resources can be inserted to enrich the educational material and to offer the fullcontent for students.Resumen Este artículo compara el formato de Microcontenido (MC), de unidades de información, pequeñas y fragmentadas, con el formato LongForm (LF) con contenido profundo y extenso, como soporte para materiales didácticos para cursos presenciales o no. El objetivo es encontrar alternativas que no simplifiquen el contenido o generen daños al proceso educativo. Se aplicó una actividad en ambos formatos a 67 estudiantes de una Universidad de Minas Gerais, que reveló las preferencias de los participantes: el MC demostró ser bueno para la construcción de materiales didácticos de menor tamaño y baja densidad de contenido. El formato LF es apropiado para contenido complejo. Éste se presenta como una alternativa viable para cursos en línea ya que está constituido por un único espacio virtual donde se pueden introducir textos más grandes y diversos recursos multimedia para facilitar la comprensión y enriquecer el contenido. Por otro lado, el formato MC está indicado para situaciones que ofrecen materiales didácticos en línea para hacer revisiones, presentación inicial y temas poco densos en extensión y en profundidad conceptual.Universidad de Murcia2021-09-24T17:48:00Z2021-09-24T17:48:00Z2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfGOMES, N. S.; MARTINS, R. X.; AZEVEDO, D. LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware. Revista de Educación a Distancia, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 65, 2021. DOI: 10.6018/red.422371.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48239Revista de Educación a Distanciareponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Nicole SantanaMartins, Ronei XimenesAzevedo, Danielaeng2023-05-08T13:11:17Zoai:localhost:1/48239Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2023-05-08T13:11:17Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware ¿LongForm o Microcontenido? análisis de soportes para materiales didácticos digitales |
title |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware |
spellingShingle |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware Gomes, Nicole Santana Mobile Learning Instructional materials Distance Education Tecnología educativa Material didáctico Educación a distancia |
title_short |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware |
title_full |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware |
title_fullStr |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware |
title_full_unstemmed |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware |
title_sort |
LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware |
author |
Gomes, Nicole Santana |
author_facet |
Gomes, Nicole Santana Martins, Ronei Ximenes Azevedo, Daniela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Ronei Ximenes Azevedo, Daniela |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Nicole Santana Martins, Ronei Ximenes Azevedo, Daniela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mobile Learning Instructional materials Distance Education Tecnología educativa Material didáctico Educación a distancia |
topic |
Mobile Learning Instructional materials Distance Education Tecnología educativa Material didáctico Educación a distancia |
description |
The use of digital educational resources has expanded considerably, including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the educationalmaterials used in these resources, the Microcontent (MC) format predominates, with its fragmented and small information units. So, we ask: can the LongForm (LF) format, which allows the presentation of dense and extensive content, be a viable alternative to MC, when applied to complex educational content, specific to undergraduate courses? The LF, hypothetically, can offer better support for higher distance education courses. To answer the question, an educational activity, elaborated in both formats, was applied to 67 students from a university of Minas Gerais state, in Brazil. The observation of student activity revealedtheir preferences: MC has shown to be good for building learning with smaller materials in both size and content complexity, but LF wasmore appropriatedwhen dealing with complex, dense, multimedia-requiring contents to facilitate understanding. It was confirmed that the LF presents itself as a viable alternative for online studying because it is constituted by a single virtual space where larger texts and varied multimedia resources can be inserted to enrich the educational material and to offer the fullcontent for students. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-24T17:48:00Z 2021-09-24T17:48:00Z 2021 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
GOMES, N. S.; MARTINS, R. X.; AZEVEDO, D. LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware. Revista de Educación a Distancia, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 65, 2021. DOI: 10.6018/red.422371. http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48239 |
identifier_str_mv |
GOMES, N. S.; MARTINS, R. X.; AZEVEDO, D. LongForm or Microcontent? An analysis of supports for digital content courseware. Revista de Educación a Distancia, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 65, 2021. DOI: 10.6018/red.422371. |
url |
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48239 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Murcia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Murcia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Educación a Distancia reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) instacron:UFLA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
instacron_str |
UFLA |
institution |
UFLA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFLA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFLA |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br |
_version_ |
1823242056339816448 |