HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035 |
Resumo: | My aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, Iexplain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately basedupon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modalobjection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulatethe CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral versionof the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond itsapparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us toa form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how thisresult ultimately undermines the CA itself (V). |
id |
UFMG-10_0d8778f1b9ee0d60ecde28741e73dad2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42035 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTCOMO O PRINCÍPIO DA RAZÃO SUFICIENTE MINA O ARGUMENTO COSMOLÓGICOCosmological argumentPrinciple of Sufficient ReasonNecessitarianismBradley’s regressMonismArgumento cosmológicoPrincípio da Razão SuficienteNecessitarianismoRegresso de BradleyMonismoMy aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, Iexplain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately basedupon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modalobjection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulatethe CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral versionof the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond itsapparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us toa form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how thisresult ultimately undermines the CA itself (V).Meu objetivo aqui é mostrar como o Argumento Cosmológico(AC) é abalado por uma de suas próprias premissas: o Princípio da RazãoSuficiente (PRS). Primeiramente, explico que tipo de AC tenho em mente (I).Em segundo lugar, explico uma objeção modal tradicional contra o PRS queé, em última instância, baseado em nossas intuições a favor da contingência(II). Em terceiro lugar, mostro como essa objeção modal clama por questionaro necessitário e, em seguida, reformulo o AC em termos mais neutros (III).Em quarto lugar, utilizando esta versão mais neutra do AC, argumento que oproblema principal com o PRS vai além de suas consequências aparentementenecessitárias. Como mostra um argumento usado por Bradley, abraçar a viaracionalista que subjaz ao PRS parece nos dedicar a uma forma de MonismoRadical também (IV). Finalmente, concluo mostrando como esse resultado, emúltima instância, mina o próprio AC (V).Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2024-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 No. 156 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 Núm. 156 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 65 No 156 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 65 N. 156 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 65 n. 156 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035/43310Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBriceño, Sebastián2024-02-14T15:55:27Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42035Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-02-14T15:55:27Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT COMO O PRINCÍPIO DA RAZÃO SUFICIENTE MINA O ARGUMENTO COSMOLÓGICO |
title |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT |
spellingShingle |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT Briceño, Sebastián Cosmological argument Principle of Sufficient Reason Necessitarianism Bradley’s regress Monism Argumento cosmológico Princípio da Razão Suficiente Necessitarianismo Regresso de Bradley Monismo |
title_short |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT |
title_full |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT |
title_fullStr |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT |
title_full_unstemmed |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT |
title_sort |
HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT |
author |
Briceño, Sebastián |
author_facet |
Briceño, Sebastián |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Briceño, Sebastián |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cosmological argument Principle of Sufficient Reason Necessitarianism Bradley’s regress Monism Argumento cosmológico Princípio da Razão Suficiente Necessitarianismo Regresso de Bradley Monismo |
topic |
Cosmological argument Principle of Sufficient Reason Necessitarianism Bradley’s regress Monism Argumento cosmológico Princípio da Razão Suficiente Necessitarianismo Regresso de Bradley Monismo |
description |
My aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, Iexplain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately basedupon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modalobjection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulatethe CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral versionof the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond itsapparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us toa form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how thisresult ultimately undermines the CA itself (V). |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035/43310 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 No. 156 (2023) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 Núm. 156 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 65 No 156 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 65 N. 156 (2023) Revista Kriterion; v. 65 n. 156 (2023) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711182979858432 |