HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Briceño, Sebastián
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035
Resumo: My aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, Iexplain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately basedupon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modalobjection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulatethe CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral versionof the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond itsapparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us toa form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how thisresult ultimately undermines the CA itself (V).
id UFMG-10_0d8778f1b9ee0d60ecde28741e73dad2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42035
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTCOMO O PRINCÍPIO DA RAZÃO SUFICIENTE MINA O ARGUMENTO COSMOLÓGICOCosmological argumentPrinciple of Sufficient ReasonNecessitarianismBradley’s regressMonismArgumento cosmológicoPrincípio da Razão SuficienteNecessitarianismoRegresso de BradleyMonismoMy aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, Iexplain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately basedupon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modalobjection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulatethe CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral versionof the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond itsapparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us toa form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how thisresult ultimately undermines the CA itself (V).Meu objetivo aqui é mostrar como o Argumento Cosmológico(AC) é abalado por uma de suas próprias premissas: o Princípio da RazãoSuficiente (PRS). Primeiramente, explico que tipo de AC tenho em mente (I).Em segundo lugar, explico uma objeção modal tradicional contra o PRS queé, em última instância, baseado em nossas intuições a favor da contingência(II). Em terceiro lugar, mostro como essa objeção modal clama por questionaro necessitário e, em seguida, reformulo o AC em termos mais neutros (III).Em quarto lugar, utilizando esta versão mais neutra do AC, argumento que oproblema principal com o PRS vai além de suas consequências aparentementenecessitárias. Como mostra um argumento usado por Bradley, abraçar a viaracionalista que subjaz ao PRS parece nos dedicar a uma forma de MonismoRadical também (IV). Finalmente, concluo mostrando como esse resultado, emúltima instância, mina o próprio AC (V).Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2024-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 No. 156 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 Núm. 156 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 65 No 156 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 65 N. 156 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 65 n. 156 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035/43310Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBriceño, Sebastián2024-02-14T15:55:27Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42035Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-02-14T15:55:27Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
COMO O PRINCÍPIO DA RAZÃO SUFICIENTE MINA O ARGUMENTO COSMOLÓGICO
title HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
spellingShingle HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Briceño, Sebastián
Cosmological argument
Principle of Sufficient Reason
Necessitarianism
Bradley’s regress
Monism
Argumento cosmológico
Princípio da Razão Suficiente
Necessitarianismo
Regresso de Bradley
Monismo
title_short HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
title_full HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
title_fullStr HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
title_full_unstemmed HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
title_sort HOW THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON UNDERMINES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
author Briceño, Sebastián
author_facet Briceño, Sebastián
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Briceño, Sebastián
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cosmological argument
Principle of Sufficient Reason
Necessitarianism
Bradley’s regress
Monism
Argumento cosmológico
Princípio da Razão Suficiente
Necessitarianismo
Regresso de Bradley
Monismo
topic Cosmological argument
Principle of Sufficient Reason
Necessitarianism
Bradley’s regress
Monism
Argumento cosmológico
Princípio da Razão Suficiente
Necessitarianismo
Regresso de Bradley
Monismo
description My aim here is to show how the Cosmological Argument (CA)is undermined by one of its own premises: the Principle of Sufficient Reason(PSR). Firstly, I explain the type of CA that I am thinking about (I). Secondly, Iexplain a traditional modal objection against the PSR, which is ultimately basedupon our intuitions in favor of contingency (II). Thirdly, I show how this modalobjection begs the question against the necessitarian, and then I reformulatethe CA in more neutral terms (III). Fourthly, using this more neutral versionof the CA, I argue that the main problem with the PSR goes way beyond itsapparent necessitarian consequences. As an argument used by Bradley shows,embracing the rationalist path that underlies the PSR seems to commit us toa form of Radical Monism too (IV). Finally, I conclude by showing how thisresult ultimately undermines the CA itself (V).
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42035/43310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 No. 156 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 Núm. 156 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 65 No 156 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 65 N. 156 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; v. 65 n. 156 (2023)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711182979858432