KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35086 |
Resumo: | This paper contends with the critical-systematical status of Kant’s argumentation in the manuscript known as Opus postumum. At first, the elements holding Kant’s conceptual accuracy in his writing methodology and the contrast of these elements to the argumentative structure of the Opus postumum are set forth. After that, the historical condition of the manuscript in what matters to ordering and presence/absence of proofs is taken into account. Finally, the philosophical situation of the Opus postumum regarding its (post-)critical contextualization is brought into discussion. The conclusion reached is that the limitation of proofs and the historical condition of the manuscript determine its philosophical nature: it will always be susceptible to an interpretation which on its own is transcendentally necessary and, at the same time, contingent-empirically conditioned. |
id |
UFMG-10_3cd8b13da90ee7e84a9eda5fd59d91a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/35086 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATIONO OPUS POSTUMUM DE KANT ENTRE A CONDICIONALIDADE EMPÍRICA E A INDETERMINAÇÃO TRANSCENDENTALfilosofia críticaidealismo alemãoconhecimento a prioriargumentação transcendentalestruturação argumentativacritical philosophyGerman idealisma priori knowledgetranscendental argumentationargumentative structuringThis paper contends with the critical-systematical status of Kant’s argumentation in the manuscript known as Opus postumum. At first, the elements holding Kant’s conceptual accuracy in his writing methodology and the contrast of these elements to the argumentative structure of the Opus postumum are set forth. After that, the historical condition of the manuscript in what matters to ordering and presence/absence of proofs is taken into account. Finally, the philosophical situation of the Opus postumum regarding its (post-)critical contextualization is brought into discussion. The conclusion reached is that the limitation of proofs and the historical condition of the manuscript determine its philosophical nature: it will always be susceptible to an interpretation which on its own is transcendentally necessary and, at the same time, contingent-empirically conditioned. Este trabalho discute o status crítico-sistemático da argumentação kantiana no manuscrito intitulado Opus postumum. A primeira seção apresenta os elementos que compõem o rigor conceitual de Kant em sua metodologia de redação e contrasta esses elementos com a estrutura argumentativa do Opus postumum. A segunda seção considera a condição história do manuscrito quanto às suas ordenação e presença/ausência de elementos probatórios. A terceira seção pondera a situação filosófica do Opus postumum no que diz respeito à sua contextualização (pós)crítica. A conclusão apresentada é a de que a limitação probatória e a condição histórica do manuscrito do Opus postumum determinam a sua natureza filosófica: ele sempre será passível de uma interpretação de necessidade transcendental condicionada pela contingência empírica.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2021-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35086Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 No. 149 (2021)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 Núm. 149 (2021)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 62 No 149 (2021)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 62 N. 149 (2021)Revista Kriterion; v. 62 n. 149 (2021)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35086/28820Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerin, Adriano 2021-10-26T19:58:55Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/35086Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:29.773189Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION O OPUS POSTUMUM DE KANT ENTRE A CONDICIONALIDADE EMPÍRICA E A INDETERMINAÇÃO TRANSCENDENTAL |
title |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION |
spellingShingle |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION Perin, Adriano filosofia crítica idealismo alemão conhecimento a priori argumentação transcendental estruturação argumentativa critical philosophy German idealism a priori knowledge transcendental argumentation argumentative structuring |
title_short |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION |
title_full |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION |
title_fullStr |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION |
title_sort |
KANT'S OPUS POSTUMUM BETWEEN EMPIRICAL CONDITIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL INDETERMINATION |
author |
Perin, Adriano |
author_facet |
Perin, Adriano |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Perin, Adriano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
filosofia crítica idealismo alemão conhecimento a priori argumentação transcendental estruturação argumentativa critical philosophy German idealism a priori knowledge transcendental argumentation argumentative structuring |
topic |
filosofia crítica idealismo alemão conhecimento a priori argumentação transcendental estruturação argumentativa critical philosophy German idealism a priori knowledge transcendental argumentation argumentative structuring |
description |
This paper contends with the critical-systematical status of Kant’s argumentation in the manuscript known as Opus postumum. At first, the elements holding Kant’s conceptual accuracy in his writing methodology and the contrast of these elements to the argumentative structure of the Opus postumum are set forth. After that, the historical condition of the manuscript in what matters to ordering and presence/absence of proofs is taken into account. Finally, the philosophical situation of the Opus postumum regarding its (post-)critical contextualization is brought into discussion. The conclusion reached is that the limitation of proofs and the historical condition of the manuscript determine its philosophical nature: it will always be susceptible to an interpretation which on its own is transcendentally necessary and, at the same time, contingent-empirically conditioned. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35086 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35086 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35086/28820 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 No. 149 (2021) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 Núm. 149 (2021) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 62 No 149 (2021) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 62 N. 149 (2021) Revista Kriterion; v. 62 n. 149 (2021) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711183355248640 |