TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soutif, Ludovic
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pontes, André Nascimento
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36247
Resumo: This paper considers one of the most significant and controversial attempts to account for the meaning of pejoratives as lexical items, namely Hom and May’s. After outlining the theory, we pinpoint sets of pejorative sentences that come out true on their account and for which the question as to whether they are compatible with the view advocated by them (so-called Moral and Semantic Innocence) remains open. Helping ourselves to the standard model-theoretical framework Hom and May (presumably) work in, we prove they are compatible with the view. Given that the issues of both the moral import of pejoratives and the practical effects of their utterance are not settled by the proof, we then highlight unwelcome moral and pragmatic implications for some of the pejorative sentences under scrutiny; thereby showing that the view, broadly understood, is not as morally and semantically innocuous as it is meant to be.
id UFMG-10_d5df61091d64ae4fb01fc1aa93aeba5c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/36247
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORYSENTENÇAS PEJORATIVAS VERDADEIRAS ALÉM DO NÚCLEO EXISTENCIAL: SOBRE AS IMPLICAÇÕES DA TEORIA DE HOM E MAYPejorativesslursmoral and semantic innocencederogationoffensivenessPejorativos Injúrias Inocência Moral e SemânticaDerrogaçãoOfensividadeThis paper considers one of the most significant and controversial attempts to account for the meaning of pejoratives as lexical items, namely Hom and May’s. After outlining the theory, we pinpoint sets of pejorative sentences that come out true on their account and for which the question as to whether they are compatible with the view advocated by them (so-called Moral and Semantic Innocence) remains open. Helping ourselves to the standard model-theoretical framework Hom and May (presumably) work in, we prove they are compatible with the view. Given that the issues of both the moral import of pejoratives and the practical effects of their utterance are not settled by the proof, we then highlight unwelcome moral and pragmatic implications for some of the pejorative sentences under scrutiny; thereby showing that the view, broadly understood, is not as morally and semantically innocuous as it is meant to be.O presente artigo contempla uma das tentativas maissignificativas e controversas de explicar o significado de pejorativos comoitens lexicais, a saber, a de Hom e May. Após apresentarmos em linhas gerais ateoria, identificamos conjuntos de sentenças pejorativas que saem verdadeirasnessa teoria e para as quais a questão da sua compatibilidade com a visão poreles defendida (a chamada Inocência Moral e Semântica) permanece em aberto.Explorando o arcabouço teórico padrão da teoria dos modelos em que Hom eMay (presumivelmente) trabalham, damos uma prova de sua compatibilidade coma visão. Dado que as questões relativas tanto à importância moral de pejorativosquanto aos efeitos práticos de seu proferimento não são resolvidas pela prova,destacamos, em seguida, implicações morais e pragmáticas indesejáveis paraalgumas das sentenças pejorativas sob escrutínio, mostrando assim que a visãode Hom e May, interpretada de maneira ampla, não é tão moral e semanticamenteinócua como deveria ser.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36247Revista Kriterion; Vol. 63 No. 153 (2022)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 63 Núm. 153 (2022)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 63 No 153 (2022)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 63 N. 153 (2022)Revista Kriterion; v. 63 n. 153 (2022)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36247/32122Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoutif, LudovicPontes, André Nascimento2023-01-06T00:32:36Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/36247Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:30.625180Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
SENTENÇAS PEJORATIVAS VERDADEIRAS ALÉM DO NÚCLEO EXISTENCIAL: SOBRE AS IMPLICAÇÕES DA TEORIA DE HOM E MAY
title TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
spellingShingle TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
Soutif, Ludovic
Pejoratives
slurs
moral and semantic innocence
derogation
offensiveness
Pejorativos
Injúrias
Inocência Moral e Semântica
Derrogação
Ofensividade
title_short TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
title_full TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
title_fullStr TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
title_full_unstemmed TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
title_sort TRUE PEJORATIVE SENTENCES BEYOND THE EXISTENTIAL CORE: ON SOME UNWELCOME IMPLICATIONS OF HOM AND MAY’S THEORY
author Soutif, Ludovic
author_facet Soutif, Ludovic
Pontes, André Nascimento
author_role author
author2 Pontes, André Nascimento
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soutif, Ludovic
Pontes, André Nascimento
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pejoratives
slurs
moral and semantic innocence
derogation
offensiveness
Pejorativos
Injúrias
Inocência Moral e Semântica
Derrogação
Ofensividade
topic Pejoratives
slurs
moral and semantic innocence
derogation
offensiveness
Pejorativos
Injúrias
Inocência Moral e Semântica
Derrogação
Ofensividade
description This paper considers one of the most significant and controversial attempts to account for the meaning of pejoratives as lexical items, namely Hom and May’s. After outlining the theory, we pinpoint sets of pejorative sentences that come out true on their account and for which the question as to whether they are compatible with the view advocated by them (so-called Moral and Semantic Innocence) remains open. Helping ourselves to the standard model-theoretical framework Hom and May (presumably) work in, we prove they are compatible with the view. Given that the issues of both the moral import of pejoratives and the practical effects of their utterance are not settled by the proof, we then highlight unwelcome moral and pragmatic implications for some of the pejorative sentences under scrutiny; thereby showing that the view, broadly understood, is not as morally and semantically innocuous as it is meant to be.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36247
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36247
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36247/32122
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 63 No. 153 (2022)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 63 Núm. 153 (2022)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 63 No 153 (2022)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 63 N. 153 (2022)
Revista Kriterion; v. 63 n. 153 (2022)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183392997376