TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451 |
Resumo: | In this paper, I argue that Plotinus’s critique of divine deliberation in Ennead VI.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinus does not propose that we expunge all reference to notions of utility and benefit from our natural explanations; he merely wishes to render those notions coherent with an ontology in which the intelligible always takes precedence over sensible reality. To this end, Plotinus introduces, first, what I call a vertical teleology, where the different animal species create the necessary conditions for the maintenance of higher forms of intelligible life, such as genera. Second, Plotinus advances what I call a horizontal teleology, where the various animal organs serve to provide a minimal coefficient of noetic content to each species in its respective ontic level. Plotinus thus sketches the outlines of a properly ‘noetic’ teleology in Ennead VI.7. |
id |
UFMG-10_e1e6a943d0058795c8bfad88e5360f4e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/34451 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7PlotinusTeleologyIntellectPhilosophy of NatureIn this paper, I argue that Plotinus’s critique of divine deliberation in Ennead VI.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinus does not propose that we expunge all reference to notions of utility and benefit from our natural explanations; he merely wishes to render those notions coherent with an ontology in which the intelligible always takes precedence over sensible reality. To this end, Plotinus introduces, first, what I call a vertical teleology, where the different animal species create the necessary conditions for the maintenance of higher forms of intelligible life, such as genera. Second, Plotinus advances what I call a horizontal teleology, where the various animal organs serve to provide a minimal coefficient of noetic content to each species in its respective ontic level. Plotinus thus sketches the outlines of a properly ‘noetic’ teleology in Ennead VI.7.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2021-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 No. 147 (2020)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 Núm. 147 (2020)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 61 No 147 (2020)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 61 N. 147 (2020)Revista Kriterion; v. 61 n. 147 (2020)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451/27261Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPortilho Andrade, Bernardo2021-06-08T17:54:37Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/34451Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:28.337800Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
title |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
spellingShingle |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 Portilho Andrade, Bernardo Plotinus Teleology Intellect Philosophy of Nature |
title_short |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
title_full |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
title_fullStr |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
title_full_unstemmed |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
title_sort |
TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7 |
author |
Portilho Andrade, Bernardo |
author_facet |
Portilho Andrade, Bernardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Portilho Andrade, Bernardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plotinus Teleology Intellect Philosophy of Nature |
topic |
Plotinus Teleology Intellect Philosophy of Nature |
description |
In this paper, I argue that Plotinus’s critique of divine deliberation in Ennead VI.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinus does not propose that we expunge all reference to notions of utility and benefit from our natural explanations; he merely wishes to render those notions coherent with an ontology in which the intelligible always takes precedence over sensible reality. To this end, Plotinus introduces, first, what I call a vertical teleology, where the different animal species create the necessary conditions for the maintenance of higher forms of intelligible life, such as genera. Second, Plotinus advances what I call a horizontal teleology, where the various animal organs serve to provide a minimal coefficient of noetic content to each species in its respective ontic level. Plotinus thus sketches the outlines of a properly ‘noetic’ teleology in Ennead VI.7. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451/27261 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 No. 147 (2020) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 Núm. 147 (2020) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 61 No 147 (2020) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 61 N. 147 (2020) Revista Kriterion; v. 61 n. 147 (2020) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711183116173312 |