TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portilho Andrade, Bernardo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451
Resumo: In this paper, I argue that Plotinus’s critique of divine deliberation in Ennead VI.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinus does not propose that we expunge all reference to notions of utility and benefit from our natural explanations; he merely wishes to render those notions coherent with an ontology in which the intelligible always takes precedence over sensible reality. To this end, Plotinus introduces, first, what I call a vertical teleology, where the different animal species create the necessary conditions for the maintenance of higher forms of intelligible life, such as genera. Second, Plotinus advances what I call a horizontal teleology, where the various animal organs serve to provide a minimal coefficient of noetic content to each species in its respective ontic level. Plotinus thus sketches the outlines of a properly ‘noetic’ teleology in Ennead VI.7.
id UFMG-10_e1e6a943d0058795c8bfad88e5360f4e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/34451
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7PlotinusTeleologyIntellectPhilosophy of NatureIn this paper, I argue that Plotinus’s critique of divine deliberation in Ennead VI.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinus does not propose that we expunge all reference to notions of utility and benefit from our natural explanations; he merely wishes to render those notions coherent with an ontology in which the intelligible always takes precedence over sensible reality. To this end, Plotinus introduces, first, what I call a vertical teleology, where the different animal species create the necessary conditions for the maintenance of higher forms of intelligible life, such as genera. Second, Plotinus advances what I call a horizontal teleology, where the various animal organs serve to provide a minimal coefficient of noetic content to each species in its respective ontic level. Plotinus thus sketches the outlines of a properly ‘noetic’ teleology in Ennead VI.7.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2021-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 No. 147 (2020)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 Núm. 147 (2020)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 61 No 147 (2020)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 61 N. 147 (2020)Revista Kriterion; v. 61 n. 147 (2020)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451/27261Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPortilho Andrade, Bernardo2021-06-08T17:54:37Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/34451Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:28.337800Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
title TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
spellingShingle TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
Portilho Andrade, Bernardo
Plotinus
Teleology
Intellect
Philosophy of Nature
title_short TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
title_full TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
title_fullStr TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
title_full_unstemmed TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
title_sort TELEOLOGY AND NOUS IN PLOTINUS’S ENNEAD VI.7
author Portilho Andrade, Bernardo
author_facet Portilho Andrade, Bernardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portilho Andrade, Bernardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plotinus
Teleology
Intellect
Philosophy of Nature
topic Plotinus
Teleology
Intellect
Philosophy of Nature
description In this paper, I argue that Plotinus’s critique of divine deliberation in Ennead VI.7 does not seek to banish teleology altogether from his philosophy of nature. Rather, his critique aims to situate teleology within his own metaphysical system so as to reconcile it with the basic principles governing the intelligible universe. In this sense, Plotinus does not propose that we expunge all reference to notions of utility and benefit from our natural explanations; he merely wishes to render those notions coherent with an ontology in which the intelligible always takes precedence over sensible reality. To this end, Plotinus introduces, first, what I call a vertical teleology, where the different animal species create the necessary conditions for the maintenance of higher forms of intelligible life, such as genera. Second, Plotinus advances what I call a horizontal teleology, where the various animal organs serve to provide a minimal coefficient of noetic content to each species in its respective ontic level. Plotinus thus sketches the outlines of a properly ‘noetic’ teleology in Ennead VI.7.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34451/27261
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 No. 147 (2020)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 Núm. 147 (2020)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 61 No 147 (2020)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 61 N. 147 (2020)
Revista Kriterion; v. 61 n. 147 (2020)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183116173312