STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baptista, Maria Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/article/view/517
Resumo: This study seeks to analyze and counteract the different modes of development of Ócio Studies (of Latin American origin) and Leisure Studies (from an essentially Anglo-Saxon background). Following the seminal work of Doistua (2006), we will discuss the main differences and similarities, whether conceptual or epistemological and methodological, among both scientific paradigms, as constituted since the late nineteenth century until today. At the end of this study, we question, in line with Inchaurraga (2012), the concept of leisure / recreation, in conjunction with the concept of work in the light of a weak reason as opposed to a strong reason as it is conceptualized by Vattimo. As a result of this journey, it is our goal to introduce the debate on leisure / ócio studies a political dimension, which seems to be absolutely essential for the further development of this theme as it appears in postmodernity, but that has been till now almost absent in investigations and reflections on this area of knowledge.
id UFMG-17_4851735394d522543f14443c54810045
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/517
network_acronym_str UFMG-17
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
repository_id_str
spelling STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURALESTUDIOS DE OCIO Y TIEMPO LIBRE ESTUDIOS – EL ACTUAL DEBATE FILOSÓFICO, POLÍTICO Y CULTURALESTUDOS DE ÓCIO E LEISURE STUDIES – O ATUAL DEBATE FILOSÓFICO, POLÍTICO E CULTURALÓcioLeisureWorkPoliticsPostmodernity.LazerÓcioTrabalhoPolíticaPós-modernidade.OcioLeisureTrabajoPolíticaPosmodernidad.This study seeks to analyze and counteract the different modes of development of Ócio Studies (of Latin American origin) and Leisure Studies (from an essentially Anglo-Saxon background). Following the seminal work of Doistua (2006), we will discuss the main differences and similarities, whether conceptual or epistemological and methodological, among both scientific paradigms, as constituted since the late nineteenth century until today. At the end of this study, we question, in line with Inchaurraga (2012), the concept of leisure / recreation, in conjunction with the concept of work in the light of a weak reason as opposed to a strong reason as it is conceptualized by Vattimo. As a result of this journey, it is our goal to introduce the debate on leisure / ócio studies a political dimension, which seems to be absolutely essential for the further development of this theme as it appears in postmodernity, but that has been till now almost absent in investigations and reflections on this area of knowledge.En este estudio se pretende analizar y contrarrestar los diferentes modos de desarrollo de Estudios de Ocio (de origen latinoamericano) y Estudios de Leisure (creación e inserción esencialmente anglosajones). Tras el trabajo seminal de Doistua (2006), vamos a discutir las principales diferencias y similitudes, ya sea conceptual o epistemológica y metodológica entre ambos paradigmas científicos, en su composición desde finales del siglo XIX hasta la actualidad. Al final de este estudio, interrogamos, en línea con Inchaurraga (2012), el concepto de ocio / leisure, junto con el concepto de trabajo a la luz de una razón débil en comparación con una razón forte, tal como conceptualizada por Vattimo. Como resultado de este viaje, es nuestro objetivo introducir en el debate sobre los estudios de ocio / leisure una dimensión política, que nos parece ser absolutamente esencial para el futuro desarrollo de este tema tal como aparece en la posmodernidad, aunque haya estado ausente hasta ahora en las investigaciones y reflexiones sobre esta área del conocimiento.O presente estudo procura analisar, e contrapor, os diferentes modos de desenvolvimento dos Estudos de Ócio (de origem ibero-americana) e dos Leisure Studies (de criação e inserção essencialmente anglosaxónica). Seguindo o trabalho seminal de Doistua (2006), debateremos as principais diferenças e semelhanças, quer conceptuais quer epistemológicas e metodológicas, entre ambos os paradigmas científicos, tal como se constituíram desde os finais do século XIX até hoje. No final deste estudo, problematizaremos, na linha de Inchaurraga (2012), o conceito de ócio/lazer, em articulação com o conceito de trabalho, à luz de uma razão débil em contraponto com uma razão forte, tal como Vattimo a conceptualizou. Como resultado deste percurso, é nosso objetivo introduzir no debate sobre os estudos de ócio/lazer uma dimensão política, que nos parece ser absolutamente essencial para o aprofundamento desta temática tal como ela se apresenta na pós-modernidade, mas que tem vindo a estar ausente nas investigações e reflexões sobre esta área do conhecimento.ANPEL2017-01-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/article/view/517Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer; v. 3 n. 1 (2016): v. 3, n. 1, jan./abr. 2016 | Dossiê Lazer e Cultura; p.20-302358-1239reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazerinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/article/view/517/350Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaptista, Maria Manuel2020-05-04T19:52:16Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/517Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbelPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/oairbel.anpel@gmail.com || edilson@lcc.ufmg.br2358-12392358-1239opendoar:2020-05-04T19:52:16Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
ESTUDIOS DE OCIO Y TIEMPO LIBRE ESTUDIOS – EL ACTUAL DEBATE FILOSÓFICO, POLÍTICO Y CULTURAL
ESTUDOS DE ÓCIO E LEISURE STUDIES – O ATUAL DEBATE FILOSÓFICO, POLÍTICO E CULTURAL
title STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
spellingShingle STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
Baptista, Maria Manuel
Ócio
Leisure
Work
Politics
Postmodernity.
Lazer
Ócio
Trabalho
Política
Pós-modernidade.
Ocio
Leisure
Trabajo
Política
Posmodernidad.
title_short STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
title_full STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
title_fullStr STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
title_full_unstemmed STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
title_sort STUDIES OF LEISURE AND LEISURE STUDIES – THE CURRENT PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL
author Baptista, Maria Manuel
author_facet Baptista, Maria Manuel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baptista, Maria Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ócio
Leisure
Work
Politics
Postmodernity.
Lazer
Ócio
Trabalho
Política
Pós-modernidade.
Ocio
Leisure
Trabajo
Política
Posmodernidad.
topic Ócio
Leisure
Work
Politics
Postmodernity.
Lazer
Ócio
Trabalho
Política
Pós-modernidade.
Ocio
Leisure
Trabajo
Política
Posmodernidad.
description This study seeks to analyze and counteract the different modes of development of Ócio Studies (of Latin American origin) and Leisure Studies (from an essentially Anglo-Saxon background). Following the seminal work of Doistua (2006), we will discuss the main differences and similarities, whether conceptual or epistemological and methodological, among both scientific paradigms, as constituted since the late nineteenth century until today. At the end of this study, we question, in line with Inchaurraga (2012), the concept of leisure / recreation, in conjunction with the concept of work in the light of a weak reason as opposed to a strong reason as it is conceptualized by Vattimo. As a result of this journey, it is our goal to introduce the debate on leisure / ócio studies a political dimension, which seems to be absolutely essential for the further development of this theme as it appears in postmodernity, but that has been till now almost absent in investigations and reflections on this area of knowledge.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/article/view/517
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/article/view/517
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbel/article/view/517/350
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer; v. 3 n. 1 (2016): v. 3, n. 1, jan./abr. 2016 | Dossiê Lazer e Cultura; p.20-30
2358-1239
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
collection Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbel.anpel@gmail.com || edilson@lcc.ufmg.br
_version_ 1798316368072802304

Registros relacionados