Learning strategies at work: A practice required today
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gestão e sociedade |
Texto Completo: | https://ges.face.ufmg.br/index.php/gestaoesociedade/article/view/2669 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Learning is inherent to the human being and valued in the most diverse of contexts. This is especially true in the work environment, where value is given to the fact that workers constantly need to learn as a means to perform their daily activities, along with act upon and produce innovations. There exist various constructs associated with this theme, in this study the focus is placed upon learning strategies for learning at work (SLW). This is defined as a composition of informal practices used by individuals, in any situation, under the intent of generating learning, the proposal here being to acquire, store, evoke and use such information that is to be learned. These practices present three components those being, cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Given the relevance of the concept, the core objective of this study was the realization of a systematic revision of the literature of the last decade, 2001 to 2017, in the journals given the best ratings by CAPES. The bibliometrics resulted in 31 articles, with 22 national and 09 international. In Brazil, there were identified four valid scales for gauging SLW, where quantitative investigations prevail. When comparing the national studies against the international studies, one notes that foreign authors are cited by the Brazilian authors, national authors are publishing abroad, thus there exist crossed citations. The research agenda points to the need to investigate new antecedents and consequents. The field of study is currently under refinement and consolidation. |
id |
UFMG-19_352c6a61b77bec1ba6e6d6056f6f6d7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2669 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-19 |
network_name_str |
Gestão e sociedade |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required todayEstratégias de aprendizagem no trabalho: Uma prática exigida pela atualidadeLearning Strategies at WorkEstratégias de Aprendizagem no TrabalhoABSTRACT Learning is inherent to the human being and valued in the most diverse of contexts. This is especially true in the work environment, where value is given to the fact that workers constantly need to learn as a means to perform their daily activities, along with act upon and produce innovations. There exist various constructs associated with this theme, in this study the focus is placed upon learning strategies for learning at work (SLW). This is defined as a composition of informal practices used by individuals, in any situation, under the intent of generating learning, the proposal here being to acquire, store, evoke and use such information that is to be learned. These practices present three components those being, cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Given the relevance of the concept, the core objective of this study was the realization of a systematic revision of the literature of the last decade, 2001 to 2017, in the journals given the best ratings by CAPES. The bibliometrics resulted in 31 articles, with 22 national and 09 international. In Brazil, there were identified four valid scales for gauging SLW, where quantitative investigations prevail. When comparing the national studies against the international studies, one notes that foreign authors are cited by the Brazilian authors, national authors are publishing abroad, thus there exist crossed citations. The research agenda points to the need to investigate new antecedents and consequents. The field of study is currently under refinement and consolidation.RESUMO A aprendizagem é inerente ao ser humano e valorizada nos mais diversos contextos, especialmente, no âmbito do trabalho é valorizada porque os trabalhadores precisam aprender constantemente com vista a realizar suas atividades cotidianas e para inovar. Existem diversos construtos associados com essa temática, aqui o foco está nas estratégias de aprendizagem para aprender no Trabalho (EAT), que é definida como uma composição de práticas informais utilizadas pelos indivíduos, em qualquer situação, com o propósito de gerar aprendizado, tendo a finalidade de adquirir, armazenar, evocar e utilizar tais informações a serem aprendidas. Estas práticas apresentam três componentes que são cognitivo, afetivo e comportamental. Dada a relevância do conceito o objetivo central desse estudo foi realizar uma revisão sistemática de literatura na última década, 2007-2017, nos periódicos melhor avaliados pela CAPES. A bibliometria resultou em 31 artigos, sendo 22 nacionais e 09 internacionais. No Brasil, foram identificadas quatro escalas validadas para aferir EAT, prevalecem as investigações quantitativas. Ao cotejar os estudos nacionais com os internacionais se observa que os autores estrangeiros são citados pelos brasileiros, autores nacionais estão publicando no exterior, há citação cruzada. A agenda de pesquisa aponta a necessidade de investigar novos antecedentes e consequentes. O campo de estudos está em refinamento e consolidação.CEPEAD/FACE - UFMG2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ges.face.ufmg.br/index.php/gestaoesociedade/article/view/266910.21171/ges.v14i37.2669Management & Society Electronic Journal; Vol. 14 No. 37 (2020): January/April, 2020; 3306-3337Gestão e Sociedade; v. 14 n. 37 (2020): Janeiro/Abril de 2020; 3306-33371980-575610.21171/ges.v14i37reponame:Gestão e sociedadeinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://ges.face.ufmg.br/index.php/gestaoesociedade/article/view/2669/1454Copyright (c) 2019 Gestão e Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGimenez, Adriane Barbosa2020-01-29T17:50:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2669Revistahttps://www.gestaoesociedade.org/gestaoesociedadePUBhttps://www.gestaoesociedade.org/gestaoesociedade/oaiges@face.ufmg.br||ricardo.ges.ufmg@gmail.com||1980-57561980-5756opendoar:2020-01-29T17:50:45Gestão e sociedade - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today Estratégias de aprendizagem no trabalho: Uma prática exigida pela atualidade |
title |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today |
spellingShingle |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today Gimenez, Adriane Barbosa Learning Strategies at Work Estratégias de Aprendizagem no Trabalho |
title_short |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today |
title_full |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today |
title_fullStr |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today |
title_full_unstemmed |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today |
title_sort |
Learning strategies at work: A practice required today |
author |
Gimenez, Adriane Barbosa |
author_facet |
Gimenez, Adriane Barbosa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gimenez, Adriane Barbosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Learning Strategies at Work Estratégias de Aprendizagem no Trabalho |
topic |
Learning Strategies at Work Estratégias de Aprendizagem no Trabalho |
description |
ABSTRACT Learning is inherent to the human being and valued in the most diverse of contexts. This is especially true in the work environment, where value is given to the fact that workers constantly need to learn as a means to perform their daily activities, along with act upon and produce innovations. There exist various constructs associated with this theme, in this study the focus is placed upon learning strategies for learning at work (SLW). This is defined as a composition of informal practices used by individuals, in any situation, under the intent of generating learning, the proposal here being to acquire, store, evoke and use such information that is to be learned. These practices present three components those being, cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Given the relevance of the concept, the core objective of this study was the realization of a systematic revision of the literature of the last decade, 2001 to 2017, in the journals given the best ratings by CAPES. The bibliometrics resulted in 31 articles, with 22 national and 09 international. In Brazil, there were identified four valid scales for gauging SLW, where quantitative investigations prevail. When comparing the national studies against the international studies, one notes that foreign authors are cited by the Brazilian authors, national authors are publishing abroad, thus there exist crossed citations. The research agenda points to the need to investigate new antecedents and consequents. The field of study is currently under refinement and consolidation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ges.face.ufmg.br/index.php/gestaoesociedade/article/view/2669 10.21171/ges.v14i37.2669 |
url |
https://ges.face.ufmg.br/index.php/gestaoesociedade/article/view/2669 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21171/ges.v14i37.2669 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ges.face.ufmg.br/index.php/gestaoesociedade/article/view/2669/1454 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gestão e Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gestão e Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CEPEAD/FACE - UFMG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CEPEAD/FACE - UFMG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Management & Society Electronic Journal; Vol. 14 No. 37 (2020): January/April, 2020; 3306-3337 Gestão e Sociedade; v. 14 n. 37 (2020): Janeiro/Abril de 2020; 3306-3337 1980-5756 10.21171/ges.v14i37 reponame:Gestão e sociedade instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Gestão e sociedade |
collection |
Gestão e sociedade |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gestão e sociedade - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ges@face.ufmg.br||ricardo.ges.ufmg@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797067419936620544 |