Further on “result administration”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monceri, Francesco
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/934
Resumo: The traditional functions of public administration have increasingly expanded to include the implementation of social purposes and the achievement of substantial equality. In this paper the notion of “result administration”, in its polysemic meaning, is used on the hand, precisely, to identify its contents; on the other hand, to question the paradigm of necessity of “public” administration as the best way to achieve social ends. With respect to this last point, there are many aspects that allow, in order to achieve the desired result, to develope that forms of public-private cooperation in the exercise of the administrative function, such as those determined by the generalization of co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest (betwen public administrations and the third sector entities), are at the basis of the possible affirmation of new administration paradigms.
id UFMG-21_f2b905ae3e9ee08c8c73f05dcf0abe5f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/934
network_acronym_str UFMG-21
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Further on “result administration”Ancora sull’amministrazione di risultatoamministrazione pubblica; amministrazione di risultato; semplificazione amministrativa; art.55 Codice del Terzo settore; co-programmazione e co-progettazione dei servizi di interesse generale.public administration; result administration; administrative semplification; Article 55 of the Third Sector Code; co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest.The traditional functions of public administration have increasingly expanded to include the implementation of social purposes and the achievement of substantial equality. In this paper the notion of “result administration”, in its polysemic meaning, is used on the hand, precisely, to identify its contents; on the other hand, to question the paradigm of necessity of “public” administration as the best way to achieve social ends. With respect to this last point, there are many aspects that allow, in order to achieve the desired result, to develope that forms of public-private cooperation in the exercise of the administrative function, such as those determined by the generalization of co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest (betwen public administrations and the third sector entities), are at the basis of the possible affirmation of new administration paradigms.Le funzioni tradizionali dell’amministrazione pubblica sono andate vieppiù ampliandosi per andare a ricomprendere l’attuazione di fini sociali e la realizzazione dell’uguaglianza sostanziale. Nel presente contributo la nozione di amministrazione di risultato, nel suo significato polisemico, è utilizzata da un lato, appunto, per individuarne i contenuti; dall’altro per mettere in discussione il paradigma della necessarietà dell’amministrazione “pubblica” quale strumento più idoneo per realizzare fini sociali. Rispetto a questo ultimo punto molti sono gli aspetti che consentono, nell’ottica del risultato desiderato, di sostenere che forme di collaborazione pubblico-privato nell’esercizio della funzione amministrativa, quali quelle determinate dalla generalizzazione della co-programmazione e co-progettazione dei servizi di interesse generale (tra pubbliche amministrazioni ed Enti del Terzo settore), siano alla base della possibile affermazione di nuovi paradigmi di amministrazione.RBEP2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/93410.9732/2021.v123.934Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 255-298Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 255-298Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 255-2982359-57360034-7191reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/934/623Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonceri, Francesco2021-12-31T20:28:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/934Revistahttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/indexONGhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/oairbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br2359-57360034-7191opendoar:2021-12-31T20:28:26Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Further on “result administration”
Ancora sull’amministrazione di risultato
title Further on “result administration”
spellingShingle Further on “result administration”
Monceri, Francesco
amministrazione pubblica; amministrazione di risultato; semplificazione amministrativa; art.55 Codice del Terzo settore; co-programmazione e co-progettazione dei servizi di interesse generale.
public administration; result administration; administrative semplification; Article 55 of the Third Sector Code; co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest.
title_short Further on “result administration”
title_full Further on “result administration”
title_fullStr Further on “result administration”
title_full_unstemmed Further on “result administration”
title_sort Further on “result administration”
author Monceri, Francesco
author_facet Monceri, Francesco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monceri, Francesco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv amministrazione pubblica; amministrazione di risultato; semplificazione amministrativa; art.55 Codice del Terzo settore; co-programmazione e co-progettazione dei servizi di interesse generale.
public administration; result administration; administrative semplification; Article 55 of the Third Sector Code; co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest.
topic amministrazione pubblica; amministrazione di risultato; semplificazione amministrativa; art.55 Codice del Terzo settore; co-programmazione e co-progettazione dei servizi di interesse generale.
public administration; result administration; administrative semplification; Article 55 of the Third Sector Code; co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest.
description The traditional functions of public administration have increasingly expanded to include the implementation of social purposes and the achievement of substantial equality. In this paper the notion of “result administration”, in its polysemic meaning, is used on the hand, precisely, to identify its contents; on the other hand, to question the paradigm of necessity of “public” administration as the best way to achieve social ends. With respect to this last point, there are many aspects that allow, in order to achieve the desired result, to develope that forms of public-private cooperation in the exercise of the administrative function, such as those determined by the generalization of co-programming and co-planning of services of general interest (betwen public administrations and the third sector entities), are at the basis of the possible affirmation of new administration paradigms.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/934
10.9732/2021.v123.934
url https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/934
identifier_str_mv 10.9732/2021.v123.934
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/934/623
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 255-298
Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 255-298
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 255-298
2359-5736
0034-7191
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br
_version_ 1798042219022647296