INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1834 |
Resumo: | In the last few years the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights have issued many important decisions concerning Internet law. In particular, the case law has faced, among others, three fundamental aspects: conflicts of jurisdiction, personal data protection and Internet service providers’ liability. This paper aims at analyzing the main decisions, in the framework of the EU legislation, in order to verify whether the Courts are following a precise strategy in their case law. Within the decisions, that may have a broader scope, the relevant legal profiles are singled out in the context of such an assumption. The answer to the question (is there a strategy?) is positive. While the three aspects may be separately considered, their tight mutual connection shows how Europe is trying to taking on a leading role in Internet governance, counterbalancing the traditional power of the United States and of the big Internet companies (Google, Facebook, Microsoft) on one side, and affirming its values (data protection above all) on the other side. |
id |
UFMG-22_0f47a5f607d350870b1c8e7e01bf9a5b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1834 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305In the last few years the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights have issued many important decisions concerning Internet law. In particular, the case law has faced, among others, three fundamental aspects: conflicts of jurisdiction, personal data protection and Internet service providers’ liability. This paper aims at analyzing the main decisions, in the framework of the EU legislation, in order to verify whether the Courts are following a precise strategy in their case law. Within the decisions, that may have a broader scope, the relevant legal profiles are singled out in the context of such an assumption. The answer to the question (is there a strategy?) is positive. While the three aspects may be separately considered, their tight mutual connection shows how Europe is trying to taking on a leading role in Internet governance, counterbalancing the traditional power of the United States and of the big Internet companies (Google, Facebook, Microsoft) on one side, and affirming its values (data protection above all) on the other side.UFMG2017-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1834REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG; 2017: II CONFERÊNCIA BRASIL-ITÁLIA; 305-3341984-18410304-2340reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1834/1737Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLugaresi, Nicola2017-08-21T20:04:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1834Revistahttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/oairevista@direito.ufmg.br1984-18410304-2340opendoar:2017-08-21T20:04:58Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
title |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
spellingShingle |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 Lugaresi, Nicola |
title_short |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
title_full |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
title_fullStr |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
title_full_unstemmed |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
title_sort |
INTERNET LAW TRENDS IN EUROPE: A CASE LAW PERSPECTIVE - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp305 |
author |
Lugaresi, Nicola |
author_facet |
Lugaresi, Nicola |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lugaresi, Nicola |
description |
In the last few years the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights have issued many important decisions concerning Internet law. In particular, the case law has faced, among others, three fundamental aspects: conflicts of jurisdiction, personal data protection and Internet service providers’ liability. This paper aims at analyzing the main decisions, in the framework of the EU legislation, in order to verify whether the Courts are following a precise strategy in their case law. Within the decisions, that may have a broader scope, the relevant legal profiles are singled out in the context of such an assumption. The answer to the question (is there a strategy?) is positive. While the three aspects may be separately considered, their tight mutual connection shows how Europe is trying to taking on a leading role in Internet governance, counterbalancing the traditional power of the United States and of the big Internet companies (Google, Facebook, Microsoft) on one side, and affirming its values (data protection above all) on the other side. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1834 |
url |
https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1834 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1834/1737 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFMG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFMG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG; 2017: II CONFERÊNCIA BRASIL-ITÁLIA; 305-334 1984-1841 0304-2340 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@direito.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1809102029204750336 |