ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1827 |
Resumo: | The main thesis discussed in this article is that it seems reasonable to argue in favour of a strict and structural connection between philosophy and law, so that philosophy of law – interpreted as a metaphysical questioning on law – is a keycomponent of law and legal knowledge that is not possible to eliminate. This conclusion is reached by reflecting on philosophy, following the explanation given by Enrico Berti, who classifies it as kind of knowledge dialogical, allabsorbing and problematic in its nature, so to be, as Aristotle himself explains, transcendental and undeniable. This same feature is the one that is possible to attribute to dialogue and truth, that are really interrelated and connected with philosophy (and so with philosophy of law): for this reason, also a brief inquiry on the nature of truth, following the explanation given by Franca D’Agostini, is presented in the article, arguing for a realistic and Aristotelian conception of truth. |
id |
UFMG-22_ca2bc3f615e56057128a22e5a3e5c3fb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1827 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101The main thesis discussed in this article is that it seems reasonable to argue in favour of a strict and structural connection between philosophy and law, so that philosophy of law – interpreted as a metaphysical questioning on law – is a keycomponent of law and legal knowledge that is not possible to eliminate. This conclusion is reached by reflecting on philosophy, following the explanation given by Enrico Berti, who classifies it as kind of knowledge dialogical, allabsorbing and problematic in its nature, so to be, as Aristotle himself explains, transcendental and undeniable. This same feature is the one that is possible to attribute to dialogue and truth, that are really interrelated and connected with philosophy (and so with philosophy of law): for this reason, also a brief inquiry on the nature of truth, following the explanation given by Franca D’Agostini, is presented in the article, arguing for a realistic and Aristotelian conception of truth.UFMG2017-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1827REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG; 2017: II CONFERÊNCIA BRASIL-ITÁLIA; 101-1201984-18410304-2340reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1827/1730Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPuppo, Frederico2017-08-21T20:08:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1827Revistahttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/oairevista@direito.ufmg.br1984-18410304-2340opendoar:2017-08-21T20:08:49Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
title |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
spellingShingle |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 Puppo, Frederico |
title_short |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
title_full |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
title_fullStr |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
title_full_unstemmed |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
title_sort |
ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp101 |
author |
Puppo, Frederico |
author_facet |
Puppo, Frederico |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Puppo, Frederico |
description |
The main thesis discussed in this article is that it seems reasonable to argue in favour of a strict and structural connection between philosophy and law, so that philosophy of law – interpreted as a metaphysical questioning on law – is a keycomponent of law and legal knowledge that is not possible to eliminate. This conclusion is reached by reflecting on philosophy, following the explanation given by Enrico Berti, who classifies it as kind of knowledge dialogical, allabsorbing and problematic in its nature, so to be, as Aristotle himself explains, transcendental and undeniable. This same feature is the one that is possible to attribute to dialogue and truth, that are really interrelated and connected with philosophy (and so with philosophy of law): for this reason, also a brief inquiry on the nature of truth, following the explanation given by Franca D’Agostini, is presented in the article, arguing for a realistic and Aristotelian conception of truth. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1827 |
url |
https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1827 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1827/1730 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFMG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFMG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFMG; 2017: II CONFERÊNCIA BRASIL-ITÁLIA; 101-120 1984-1841 0304-2340 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@direito.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1809102029194264576 |