Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e12247 |
Resumo: | The article 293 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS or Convention) deals with the applicable law to courts and tribunals under the Convention. However, the limits of its interpretation are still controversial regarding its use as a jurisdictional clause. Despite the jurisdiction rules specified in article 288 of UNCLOS, courts and tribunals have been awarding different decisions regarding this use, sometimes entertaining the claims, sometimes dismissing it. The present work is devoted to analyzing which of the interpretations on this matter is more adequate regarding conferring stability to the dispute settlement mechanism established by the Convention. |
id |
UFMG-28_0522de380c026671eaac233456a9357d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/12247 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-28 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause?¿El artículo 293 de la UNCLOS como cláusula jurisdiccional?Artigo 293 da UNCLOS como cláusula jurisdicional?UNCLOSTribunalsJurisdictionApplicable lawUNCLOSTribunaisJurisdiçãoDireito aplicávelTribunalesUNCLOSJurisdicciónDerecho aplicableThe article 293 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS or Convention) deals with the applicable law to courts and tribunals under the Convention. However, the limits of its interpretation are still controversial regarding its use as a jurisdictional clause. Despite the jurisdiction rules specified in article 288 of UNCLOS, courts and tribunals have been awarding different decisions regarding this use, sometimes entertaining the claims, sometimes dismissing it. The present work is devoted to analyzing which of the interpretations on this matter is more adequate regarding conferring stability to the dispute settlement mechanism established by the Convention.El artículo 293 de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar (UNCLOS o Convención) trata de la ley aplicable a los juzgados y tribunales en virtud de la Convención. Sin embargo, los límites de la interpretación de esta disposición siguen siendo controvertidos en cuanto a su uso como cláusula jurisdiccional. A pesar de las normas de jurisdicción especificadas en el artículo 288 de la CNUDM, los tribunales han decidido de manera diferente sobre este uso del artículo 293 de la Convención, a veces admitiendo la reclamación, a veces rechazándola. Mientras tanto, este artículo propone investigar qué interpretación es la más adecuada para conferir estabilidad al mecanismo de solución de controversias establecido por la Convención.O artigo 293 da Convenção das Nações Unidas sobre o Direito do Mar (UNCLOS ou Convenção) trata do direito aplicável às cortes e tribunais previstos na Convenção. No entanto, os limites da interpretação deste dispositivo se demonstram, ainda, controversos quanto ao seu uso como cláusula jurisdicional. Apesar das regras de jurisdição especificadas no artigo 288 da UNCLOS, cortes e tribunais têm decidido diversamente sobre esta utilização do art. 293 da Convenção, ora admitindo a demanda, ora rejeitando-a. Nesse ínterim, este artigo propõe investigar qual a interpretação mais adequada para conferir estabilidade ao mecanismo de solução de controvérsias estabelecido pela Convenção.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e1224710.35699/2525-8036.2019.12247Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019); 1-18Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2019); 1-18Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 4 n. 1 (2019); 1-182525-80362595-6051reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e12247/9865Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza Silvahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza2023-02-27T17:23:20Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/12247Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revicePUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/oairevistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com2525-80362525-8036opendoar:2023-02-27T17:23:20Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? ¿El artículo 293 de la UNCLOS como cláusula jurisdiccional? Artigo 293 da UNCLOS como cláusula jurisdicional? |
title |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? |
spellingShingle |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? Silva, Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza UNCLOS Tribunals Jurisdiction Applicable law UNCLOS Tribunais Jurisdição Direito aplicável Tribunales UNCLOS Jurisdicción Derecho aplicable |
title_short |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? |
title_full |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? |
title_fullStr |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? |
title_sort |
Article 293 of UNCLOS as a jurisdictional clause? |
author |
Silva, Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza |
author_facet |
Silva, Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
UNCLOS Tribunals Jurisdiction Applicable law UNCLOS Tribunais Jurisdição Direito aplicável Tribunales UNCLOS Jurisdicción Derecho aplicable |
topic |
UNCLOS Tribunals Jurisdiction Applicable law UNCLOS Tribunais Jurisdição Direito aplicável Tribunales UNCLOS Jurisdicción Derecho aplicable |
description |
The article 293 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS or Convention) deals with the applicable law to courts and tribunals under the Convention. However, the limits of its interpretation are still controversial regarding its use as a jurisdictional clause. Despite the jurisdiction rules specified in article 288 of UNCLOS, courts and tribunals have been awarding different decisions regarding this use, sometimes entertaining the claims, sometimes dismissing it. The present work is devoted to analyzing which of the interpretations on this matter is more adequate regarding conferring stability to the dispute settlement mechanism established by the Convention. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e12247 10.35699/2525-8036.2019.12247 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e12247 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35699/2525-8036.2019.12247 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e12247/9865 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza Silva http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Henrique Pirani de Souza Silva http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019); 1-18 Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2019); 1-18 Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 4 n. 1 (2019); 1-18 2525-8036 2595-6051 reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796798282387685376 |