Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e45375 |
Resumo: | The article proposes a critical analysis of the theory created by Paolo Sandro, Italian philosopher of law and author of the book “The Making of Constitutional Democracy”, in reaction to the modern theory of separation of powers, developed by Montesquieu, based on his relationship with the Latin American constitutional movement known as New Latin American Constitutionalism. The article presents the research question-problem: "Is it possible to speak of a rupture with Montesquieu's model in the experiences of the New Latin American Constitutionalism?". Thus, it works from two main hypotheses, namely: (i) the New Latin American Constitutionalism breaks with the Montesquian model of separation of powers; and (ii) it is possible to build bridges of dialogue between classical and critical Latin American theories, based on the category of popular sovereignty. The second hypothesis has the highest probability of being corroborated. The methodology used is a literary review, with keywords such as "Separation of Powers", "Montesquieu", "New Latin American Constitutionalism" and "Latin American Constitutionalism", in addition to the analysis of Paolo Sandro's book. Throughout the development and conclusions of this article, it was found in the experiences of the Venezuelan Constitution of 1999 and the Bolivian Constitution of 2009 the presence of quadripartite models of separation of powers, which included, respectively, the “Citizen Power” and the “Plurinational Electoral Power” as forms of institutionalization of popular power in the democratic game. Thus, it was understood by the partial rupture of the Montesquian model, bringing the people into the separation of powers. |
id |
UFMG-28_6aafbadd510677d2135337e1da20e07d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/45375 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-28 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of powerMontesquieu en America Latina: crítica a la crítica de Paolo Sandro a la teoría de la separación de poderesMontesquieu na América Latina: crítica da crítica de Paolo Sandro à teoria da separação de poderSeparation of powersMontesquieuPaolo SandroNew Latin American ConstitutionalismPopular sovereigntySeparação de poderesMontesquieuPaolo SandroNovo Constitucionalismo Latino-AmericanoSoberania popularSeparaci´on de poderesMontesquieuPaolo SadroNuevo Constitucionalismo LatinoamericanoSoberanía popularThe article proposes a critical analysis of the theory created by Paolo Sandro, Italian philosopher of law and author of the book “The Making of Constitutional Democracy”, in reaction to the modern theory of separation of powers, developed by Montesquieu, based on his relationship with the Latin American constitutional movement known as New Latin American Constitutionalism. The article presents the research question-problem: "Is it possible to speak of a rupture with Montesquieu's model in the experiences of the New Latin American Constitutionalism?". Thus, it works from two main hypotheses, namely: (i) the New Latin American Constitutionalism breaks with the Montesquian model of separation of powers; and (ii) it is possible to build bridges of dialogue between classical and critical Latin American theories, based on the category of popular sovereignty. The second hypothesis has the highest probability of being corroborated. The methodology used is a literary review, with keywords such as "Separation of Powers", "Montesquieu", "New Latin American Constitutionalism" and "Latin American Constitutionalism", in addition to the analysis of Paolo Sandro's book. Throughout the development and conclusions of this article, it was found in the experiences of the Venezuelan Constitution of 1999 and the Bolivian Constitution of 2009 the presence of quadripartite models of separation of powers, which included, respectively, the “Citizen Power” and the “Plurinational Electoral Power” as forms of institutionalization of popular power in the democratic game. Thus, it was understood by the partial rupture of the Montesquian model, bringing the people into the separation of powers. El artículo propone un análisis crítico de la teoría elaborada por Paolo Sandro, filósofo italiano del derecho y autor del libro “La construcción de la democracia constitucional”, en reacción a la moderna teoría de la separación de poderes, desarrollada por Montesquieu, a partir de su relación con el movimiento constitucionalista latinoamericano conocido como Nuevo Constitucionalismo Latinoamericano. El artículo plantea la pregunta-problema de investigación: “¿Es posible hablar de una ruptura con el modelo de Montesquieu en las experiencias del Nuevo Constitucionalismo latinoamericano?”. Así, parte de dos hipótesis principales, a saber: (i) el Nuevo Constitucionalismo latinoamericano rompe con el modelo montesquiano de separación de poderes; y (ii) es posible tender puentes de diálogo entre las teorías latinoamericanas clásica y crítica, a partir de la categoría de soberanía popular. La segunda hipótesis tiene la mayor probabilidad de ser corroborada. La metodología utilizada es una revisión literaria, con palabras clave como "Separación de poderes", "Montesquieu", "Nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano" y "Constitucionalismo latinoamericano", además del análisis del libro de Paolo Sandro. A lo largo del desarrollo y conclusiones de este artículo, se encontró en las experiencias de la Constitución venezolana de 1999 y la Constitución boliviana de 2009 la presencia de modelos cuatripartitos de separación de poderes, que incluían, respectivamente, el “Poder Ciudadano” y el “Poder Ciudadano”. Poder Electoral Plurinacional” como formas de institucionalización del poder popular en el juego democrático. Así, se entendió por la ruptura parcial del modelo Montesquiano, llevando al pueblo a la separación de poderes.O artigo propõe uma análise crítica da teoria criada por Paolo Sandro, filósofo italiano do Direito e autor do livro “The Making of Constitutional Democracy”, em reação à teoria moderna da separação de poderes, desenvolvida por Montesquieu, a partir de sua relação com o movimento constitucional latino-americano conhecido como Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano. O artigo apresenta a pergunta-problema de pesquisa: "É possível falar numa ruptura com o modelo de Montesquieu nas experiências do Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano?". Assim, trabalha-se a partir de duas hipóteses principais, quais sejam: (i) o Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano rompe com o modelo montesquiano de separação de poderes; e (ii) é possível construir pontes de diálogo entre as teorias clássicas e críticas latino-americanas, a partir da categoria de soberania popular. A segunda hipótese possui a maior probabilidade de ser corroborada. A metodologia utilizada é uma revisão literária, com palavras-chave como "Separação de Poderes", "Montesquieu", "Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano" e "Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano", além da análise do livro de Paolo Sandro. Ao longo do desenvolvimento e das conclusões do presente artigo, encontrou-se nas experiências da Constituição venezuelana de 1999 e da Constituição boliviana de 2009 a presença de modelos quadripartites de separação de poderes, os quais incluíram, respectivamente, o “Poder Ciudadano” e o “Poder Eleitoral Plurinacional” como formas de institucionalização do poder popular no jogo democrático. Assim, compreendeu-se pela ruptura parcial do modelo montesquiano, trazendo o povo para dentro da separação de poderes.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2023-07-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e4537510.35699/2525-8036.2023.45375Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): International Studies: from European Union to the world; 1 - 24Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2023): Estudios Internacionales: desde la Unión Europea para el mundo; 1 - 24Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 8 n. 2 (2023): Estudos Internacionais: da União Europeia para o mundo; 1 - 242525-80362595-6051reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e45375/e45375Copyright (c) 2023 Danilo Sardinha Marcolinohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarcolino, Danilo Sardinha2023-12-26T16:12:57Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/45375Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revicePUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/oairevistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com2525-80362525-8036opendoar:2023-12-26T16:12:57Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power Montesquieu en America Latina: crítica a la crítica de Paolo Sandro a la teoría de la separación de poderes Montesquieu na América Latina: crítica da crítica de Paolo Sandro à teoria da separação de poder |
title |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power |
spellingShingle |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power Marcolino, Danilo Sardinha Separation of powers Montesquieu Paolo Sandro New Latin American Constitutionalism Popular sovereignty Separação de poderes Montesquieu Paolo Sandro Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano Soberania popular Separaci´on de poderes Montesquieu Paolo Sadro Nuevo Constitucionalismo Latinoamericano Soberanía popular |
title_short |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power |
title_full |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power |
title_fullStr |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power |
title_full_unstemmed |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power |
title_sort |
Montesquieu in Latin America: critique of Paolo Sandro's critique of the theory of separation of power |
author |
Marcolino, Danilo Sardinha |
author_facet |
Marcolino, Danilo Sardinha |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marcolino, Danilo Sardinha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Separation of powers Montesquieu Paolo Sandro New Latin American Constitutionalism Popular sovereignty Separação de poderes Montesquieu Paolo Sandro Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano Soberania popular Separaci´on de poderes Montesquieu Paolo Sadro Nuevo Constitucionalismo Latinoamericano Soberanía popular |
topic |
Separation of powers Montesquieu Paolo Sandro New Latin American Constitutionalism Popular sovereignty Separação de poderes Montesquieu Paolo Sandro Novo Constitucionalismo Latino-Americano Soberania popular Separaci´on de poderes Montesquieu Paolo Sadro Nuevo Constitucionalismo Latinoamericano Soberanía popular |
description |
The article proposes a critical analysis of the theory created by Paolo Sandro, Italian philosopher of law and author of the book “The Making of Constitutional Democracy”, in reaction to the modern theory of separation of powers, developed by Montesquieu, based on his relationship with the Latin American constitutional movement known as New Latin American Constitutionalism. The article presents the research question-problem: "Is it possible to speak of a rupture with Montesquieu's model in the experiences of the New Latin American Constitutionalism?". Thus, it works from two main hypotheses, namely: (i) the New Latin American Constitutionalism breaks with the Montesquian model of separation of powers; and (ii) it is possible to build bridges of dialogue between classical and critical Latin American theories, based on the category of popular sovereignty. The second hypothesis has the highest probability of being corroborated. The methodology used is a literary review, with keywords such as "Separation of Powers", "Montesquieu", "New Latin American Constitutionalism" and "Latin American Constitutionalism", in addition to the analysis of Paolo Sandro's book. Throughout the development and conclusions of this article, it was found in the experiences of the Venezuelan Constitution of 1999 and the Bolivian Constitution of 2009 the presence of quadripartite models of separation of powers, which included, respectively, the “Citizen Power” and the “Plurinational Electoral Power” as forms of institutionalization of popular power in the democratic game. Thus, it was understood by the partial rupture of the Montesquian model, bringing the people into the separation of powers. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e45375 10.35699/2525-8036.2023.45375 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e45375 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35699/2525-8036.2023.45375 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e45375/e45375 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Danilo Sardinha Marcolino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Danilo Sardinha Marcolino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): International Studies: from European Union to the world; 1 - 24 Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2023): Estudios Internacionales: desde la Unión Europea para el mundo; 1 - 24 Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 8 n. 2 (2023): Estudos Internacionais: da União Europeia para o mundo; 1 - 24 2525-8036 2595-6051 reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796798282297507840 |