“Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Adriana do Carmo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e29325
Resumo: This essay aims to dialogue with some reflections from Professor Dr. David F.L. Gomes about his approach on “BRAZIL, 2020: AN ATTEMPT TO DIAGNOSIS”. The theoretical-methodological framework was built with some contributions from the Theories of Argumentation, through the text “Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme: at-perdu le goût du vrai”, by French linguist Emmanuelle Danblon (2020), thought out discursively with some categories extracted from Habermas' Social Theory, made explicit especially in his works Theory of Communicative Action I (1999 [1981]), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (2000 [1985]) and Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action 1989 [1983]. Thus, the purpose of this text is to discuss some Habermasian categories such as "world of life", "reification of society", "communicative rationality", "decentralization of the subject" and others that, combined with the idea of ​​reason within the limits of its precariousness, will allow us to think about the subject's relationship with the notion of post-truth, as possible interpretations of the current context related to Brazilian society.
id UFMG-28_a78c2d6c9a5dd7d063e56c03e046e4a2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/29325
network_acronym_str UFMG-28
network_name_str Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways“Brasil, 2020” : intento de diálogo a través de canales discursivos“Brasil, 2020” : tentativa de diálogo pelas vias discursivasBrazilSpeechPost-truthRationalityModernityBrasilDiscursoPós-VerdadeRacionalidadeModernidadeBrasilDiscursoPosverdadRacionalidadModernidadThis essay aims to dialogue with some reflections from Professor Dr. David F.L. Gomes about his approach on “BRAZIL, 2020: AN ATTEMPT TO DIAGNOSIS”. The theoretical-methodological framework was built with some contributions from the Theories of Argumentation, through the text “Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme: at-perdu le goût du vrai”, by French linguist Emmanuelle Danblon (2020), thought out discursively with some categories extracted from Habermas' Social Theory, made explicit especially in his works Theory of Communicative Action I (1999 [1981]), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (2000 [1985]) and Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action 1989 [1983]. Thus, the purpose of this text is to discuss some Habermasian categories such as "world of life", "reification of society", "communicative rationality", "decentralization of the subject" and others that, combined with the idea of ​​reason within the limits of its precariousness, will allow us to think about the subject's relationship with the notion of post-truth, as possible interpretations of the current context related to Brazilian society.Este ensayo pretende dialogar con algunas reflexiones del profesor Dr. David F.L. Gomes acerca de su enfoque sobre "BRASIL, 2020: UNA TENTATIVA DE DIAGNÓSTICO". El marco teórico y metodológico se construyó con algunas aportaciones de las Teorías de la Argumentación, a través del texto "Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme : a-t-on perdu le goût du vrai", de la lingüista francesa Emmanuelle Danblon (2020), pensado discursivamente con algunas categorías extraídas de la Teoría Social de Habermas, explicadas especialmente en sus obras Teoría de la acción comunicativa I (1999 [1981]), El discurso filosófico de la modernidad (2000 [1985]) y Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa (1989 [1983]). Así, el propósito de este texto es discutir algunas categorías habermasianas como "mundo de la vida", "reificación de la sociedad", "racionalidad comunicativa", "descentramiento del sujeto" y otras que, combinadas con la idea de la razón en los límites de su precariedad, nos permitirán pensar en la relación entre el sujeto y la noción de posverdad, como posibles interpretaciones del contexto actual respecto a la sociedad brasileña.Este ensaio visa a dialogar com algumas reflexões do professor Dr. David F.L. Gomes acerca de sua abordagem sobre o “BRASIL, 2020: TENTATIVA DE DIAGNÓSTICO”. O arcabouço teórico-metodológico foi construído com alguns aportes das Teorias da Argumentação, por meio do texto “Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme : a-t-on perdu le goût du vrai”, da linguista francesa Emmanuelle Danblon (2020), pensados discursivamente com algumas categorias extraídas da Teoria Social de Habermas, explicitadas especialmente em suas obras Teoria da Ação Comunicativa I (1999 [1981]), O discurso filosófico da Modernidade (2000 [1985]) e Consciência moral e agir comunicativo (1989 [1983]). Dessa forma, o propósito deste texto é discutir algumas categorias habermasianas como “mundo da vida”, “reificação da sociedade”, “racionalidade comunicativa”, “descentramento do sujeito” e outras que, conjugadas à ideia de razão nos limites de sua precariedade, nos permitirão pensar a relação do sujeito com a noção de pós-verdade, como possíveis interpretativos do contexto atual relativo à sociedade brasileira.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2021-04-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e2932510.35699/2525-8036.2021.29325Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Estudos brasileiros: passado, presente e futuro; 1 - 12Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2021): Estudos brasileiros: passado, presente e futuro; 1 - 12Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 6 n. 1 (2021): Estudos brasileiros: passado, presente e futuro; 1 - 122525-80362595-6051reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e29325/e29325Copyright (c) 2021 Adriana do Carmo Figueiredohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFigueiredo, Adriana do Carmo2023-07-17T15:41:33Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/29325Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revicePUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/oairevistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com2525-80362525-8036opendoar:2023-07-17T15:41:33Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
“Brasil, 2020” : intento de diálogo a través de canales discursivos
“Brasil, 2020” : tentativa de diálogo pelas vias discursivas
title “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
spellingShingle “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
Figueiredo, Adriana do Carmo
Brazil
Speech
Post-truth
Rationality
Modernity
Brasil
Discurso
Pós-Verdade
Racionalidade
Modernidade
Brasil
Discurso
Posverdad
Racionalidad
Modernidad
title_short “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
title_full “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
title_fullStr “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
title_full_unstemmed “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
title_sort “Brasil, 2020” : an attempt to dialogue through discursive ways
author Figueiredo, Adriana do Carmo
author_facet Figueiredo, Adriana do Carmo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, Adriana do Carmo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazil
Speech
Post-truth
Rationality
Modernity
Brasil
Discurso
Pós-Verdade
Racionalidade
Modernidade
Brasil
Discurso
Posverdad
Racionalidad
Modernidad
topic Brazil
Speech
Post-truth
Rationality
Modernity
Brasil
Discurso
Pós-Verdade
Racionalidade
Modernidade
Brasil
Discurso
Posverdad
Racionalidad
Modernidad
description This essay aims to dialogue with some reflections from Professor Dr. David F.L. Gomes about his approach on “BRAZIL, 2020: AN ATTEMPT TO DIAGNOSIS”. The theoretical-methodological framework was built with some contributions from the Theories of Argumentation, through the text “Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme: at-perdu le goût du vrai”, by French linguist Emmanuelle Danblon (2020), thought out discursively with some categories extracted from Habermas' Social Theory, made explicit especially in his works Theory of Communicative Action I (1999 [1981]), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (2000 [1985]) and Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action 1989 [1983]. Thus, the purpose of this text is to discuss some Habermasian categories such as "world of life", "reification of society", "communicative rationality", "decentralization of the subject" and others that, combined with the idea of ​​reason within the limits of its precariousness, will allow us to think about the subject's relationship with the notion of post-truth, as possible interpretations of the current context related to Brazilian society.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e29325
10.35699/2525-8036.2021.29325
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e29325
identifier_str_mv 10.35699/2525-8036.2021.29325
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e29325/e29325
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Adriana do Carmo Figueiredo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Adriana do Carmo Figueiredo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Estudos brasileiros: passado, presente e futuro; 1 - 12
Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2021): Estudos brasileiros: passado, presente e futuro; 1 - 12
Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 6 n. 1 (2021): Estudos brasileiros: passado, presente e futuro; 1 - 12
2525-8036
2595-6051
reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
collection Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com
_version_ 1796798281553018880

Registros relacionados