Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Nova Economia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/471 |
Resumo: | The main objective of this article is to reexamine an old controversy between analysts of Marx: the relationship between Marxist thought and philosophy, as well as the issue of methodology. The purpose is not to reach a final conclusion on such an intriguing topic, but rather to point out some elements that will show that this topic is far from “worn out.” To the contrary. After outlining the critical relationship between Marx and the classical German tradition, which is perhaps responsible for so much confusion, the article seeks to clarify how Marx understands and conceives the operative functions of reason, as well as the role that objectivity plays in his theoretical path. In addition, this article raises the issue of the character that knowledge assumes in his theoretical corpus: is it speculative knowledge or the knowledge of transformation? Finally, the article examines the character of the materialism initiated by Marx, as well as references made in Capital to Hegelian dialectic. |
id |
UFMG-4_ec70eca3e6d84b139ae12a7f2be9bc0b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/471 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-4 |
network_name_str |
Nova Economia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessáriaMarx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessáriamarxist philosophymarxist methodologyfilosofia marxianaThe main objective of this article is to reexamine an old controversy between analysts of Marx: the relationship between Marxist thought and philosophy, as well as the issue of methodology. The purpose is not to reach a final conclusion on such an intriguing topic, but rather to point out some elements that will show that this topic is far from “worn out.” To the contrary. After outlining the critical relationship between Marx and the classical German tradition, which is perhaps responsible for so much confusion, the article seeks to clarify how Marx understands and conceives the operative functions of reason, as well as the role that objectivity plays in his theoretical path. In addition, this article raises the issue of the character that knowledge assumes in his theoretical corpus: is it speculative knowledge or the knowledge of transformation? Finally, the article examines the character of the materialism initiated by Marx, as well as references made in Capital to Hegelian dialectic.O objetivo principal do artigo é resgatar uma velha questão polêmica entre os intérpretes de Marx: a relação do pensamento marxiano com a filosofia, e também com a questão etodológica, mas sem pretensão de esgotar tal instigante assunto. Em verdade, trata-se de indicar alguns elementos para evidenciar que não se quer dizer que esse é um tema “esgotado”. Ao contrário. Assim, após esboçar a relação crítica de Marx com a tradição clássica alemã, responsável, talvez, pelo surgimento de tantos embaraços, o artigo procura esclarecer o modo como Marx entende e concebe as funções operativas da razão, bem como o estatuto que a objetividade possuiem sua trajetória teórica. Ademais, problematiza-se o caráter mesmo que o saber assume em seu corpus teórico: seria um saber especulativo ou um saber da transformação? Por fim, intenta-se esclarecer o caráter do materialismo instaurado por Marx, como também referências feitas em O capital à dialética hegeliana.Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da UFMG2009-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/471Nova Economia; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2006)Nova Economia; v. 16 n. 2 (2006)1980-53810103-6351reponame:Nova Economia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/471/467Vaisman, Esterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-11T04:27:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/471Revistahttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomiaPUBhttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/oai||ne@face.ufmg.br1980-53810103-6351opendoar:2020-08-11T04:27:18Nova Economia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
title |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
spellingShingle |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária Vaisman, Ester marxist philosophy marxist methodology filosofia marxiana |
title_short |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
title_full |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
title_fullStr |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
title_sort |
Marx e a Filosofia: elementos para a discussão ainda necessária |
author |
Vaisman, Ester |
author_facet |
Vaisman, Ester |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vaisman, Ester |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
marxist philosophy marxist methodology filosofia marxiana |
topic |
marxist philosophy marxist methodology filosofia marxiana |
description |
The main objective of this article is to reexamine an old controversy between analysts of Marx: the relationship between Marxist thought and philosophy, as well as the issue of methodology. The purpose is not to reach a final conclusion on such an intriguing topic, but rather to point out some elements that will show that this topic is far from “worn out.” To the contrary. After outlining the critical relationship between Marx and the classical German tradition, which is perhaps responsible for so much confusion, the article seeks to clarify how Marx understands and conceives the operative functions of reason, as well as the role that objectivity plays in his theoretical path. In addition, this article raises the issue of the character that knowledge assumes in his theoretical corpus: is it speculative knowledge or the knowledge of transformation? Finally, the article examines the character of the materialism initiated by Marx, as well as references made in Capital to Hegelian dialectic. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-06-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/471 |
url |
https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/471 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/471/467 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da UFMG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da UFMG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Nova Economia; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2006) Nova Economia; v. 16 n. 2 (2006) 1980-5381 0103-6351 reponame:Nova Economia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Nova Economia (Online) |
collection |
Nova Economia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Nova Economia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ne@face.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1799711057357307904 |