TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Urban, Ana Cláudia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educação em Revista
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626
Resumo: The objective of this article is to reflect on the teaching of History from the experience carried out with academics of the Undergraduate Course in History / UFPR during the development of the Teaching Practice course in the academic year of 2020. As a part of the activities of that course, monitoring of remote classes was offered by the State Department of Education of Paraná (SEED-PR) as well as the systematization of records through the field diary. For the reflections of this article, we will approach the observations made by the licensors themselves about remote classes focused on the Final Years of Elementary School and for High School. From this material, here understood as a source, we intend to discuss the graduates' perceptions about the teaching-learning process, considering the methodological debate present in the classes that were observed. As a result, we point out the presence of the quantity x quality dilemma (deepening, problematization) of content; the way of mediating academic knowledge and historical school knowledge and the mnemonic characteristic of the activities proposed in remote classes, to the detriment of problematizations that consider licensors' arguments when relating to historical knowledge. For the analysis of these questions, we used as a reference the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field, those of the field of Historical Education with Jörn Rüsen, to reflect on the formation of historical consciousness and those of Ana Zavala, to think the teaching practice and the meaning of these observations in the initial formation of History teachers.
id UFMG-5_2198ae6d4c625019ccbb44aed556c58c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/32626
network_acronym_str UFMG-5
network_name_str Educação em Revista
repository_id_str
spelling TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS LA PRÁCTICA DOCENTE EN EL AREA DE HISTORIA EN TIEMPOS DE PANDEMIA : PERCEPCIONES DE LOS LICENCIANDOS Prática de Docência em História em tempos de pandemia: percepções de licenciandos/asformação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência.teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice.formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docenteThe objective of this article is to reflect on the teaching of History from the experience carried out with academics of the Undergraduate Course in History / UFPR during the development of the Teaching Practice course in the academic year of 2020. As a part of the activities of that course, monitoring of remote classes was offered by the State Department of Education of Paraná (SEED-PR) as well as the systematization of records through the field diary. For the reflections of this article, we will approach the observations made by the licensors themselves about remote classes focused on the Final Years of Elementary School and for High School. From this material, here understood as a source, we intend to discuss the graduates' perceptions about the teaching-learning process, considering the methodological debate present in the classes that were observed. As a result, we point out the presence of the quantity x quality dilemma (deepening, problematization) of content; the way of mediating academic knowledge and historical school knowledge and the mnemonic characteristic of the activities proposed in remote classes, to the detriment of problematizations that consider licensors' arguments when relating to historical knowledge. For the analysis of these questions, we used as a reference the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field, those of the field of Historical Education with Jörn Rüsen, to reflect on the formation of historical consciousness and those of Ana Zavala, to think the teaching practice and the meaning of these observations in the initial formation of History teachers.El objetivo de este artículo es reflexionar sobre la docencia de la História a partir de la experiencia realizada con académicos de la Licenciatura en Historia / UFPR durante el desarrollo de la disciplina Práctica Docente en el año académico 2020. Formaba parte de las actividades de esa disciplina la asistencia a las clases remotas que ofrece la Secretaría de Educación del Estado de Paraná (SEED-PR) y la sistematización de registros a través del diario de campo. Para las reflexiones de este artículo, nos acercaremos a las observaciones realizadas por los propios licenciandos sobre las clases remotas enfocadas a los últimos años de la educación secundária y Bachillerato. A partir de este material, asumido aquí como fuente, pretendemos discutir las percepciones de los licenciados ​​sobre la relación enseñanza-aprendizaje, considerando el debate metodológico presente en las clases asistidas. Como resultado, señalamos la presencia del dilema cantidad x calidad (profundización, problematización) de los contenidos; la forma de mediar el conocimiento académico y el conocimiento histórico escolar y la característica mnemotécnica de las actividades propuestas en las clases remotas, en detrimento de las problematizaciones que consideran los argumentos de los licenciandos al relacionarse con el conocimiento histórico. Para el análisis de estas cuestiones utilizamos como referencia los aportes de Pierre Bourdieu, especialmente los conceptos de habitus y campo, los del campo de la Educación Histórica con Jörn Rüsen, para reflexionar sobre la formación de la conciencia histórica y los de Ana Zavala, pensar la práctica docente y el significado de estas observaciones en la formación inicial de los profesores de Historia.O objetivo deste artigo é refletirmos sobre o ensino de História a partir da experiência realizada junto a estudantes do curso de Graduação em História/UFPR durante o desenvolvimento da disciplina Prática de Docência no ano letivo de 2020. Como parte das atividades da referida disciplina estava o acompanhamento de aulas remotas ofertadas pela Secretaria de Estado da Educação do Paraná (SEED-PR) e a sistematização de registros por meio do diário de campo. Para as reflexões deste artigo abordaremos as observações feitas pelos/as próprios licenciandos/as acerca de aulas remotas voltadas para os Anos Finais do Ensino Fundamental e para o Ensino Médio. A partir desse material, aqui assumido como fonte, pretendemos discutir as percepções dos/as licenciados/as sobre a relação ensino aprendizagem, considerando o debate metodológico presente nas aulas acompanhadas. Como resultado apontamos a presença do dilema quantidade x qualidade (aprofundamento, problematização) de conteúdo; a forma de mediar o conhecimento acadêmico e o conhecimento histórico escolar e a característica mnemônica das atividades propostas nas aulas remotas, em detrimento de problematizações que consideram a argumentação dos alunos ao se relacionarem com o conhecimento histórico. Para a análise destas questões utilizamos como referência as contribuições de Pierre Bourdieu, em especial os conceitos de habitus e de campo, as do campo da Educação Histórica com Jörn Rüsen, para refletir acerca da formação da consciência histórica e as de Ana Zavala, para pensar a prática docente e o sentido destas observações na formação inicial de professores de História.Educação em Revista 2022-01-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626Educação em Revista ; v. 37 n. 1 (2021): Vol. 37 (2021)1982-66210102-4698reponame:Educação em Revistainstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29529https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29530Copyright (c) 2022 Educação em Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Nadia GaiofattoUrban, Ana Cláudia2023-05-29T13:08:43Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/32626Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/oai||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br1982-66210102-4698opendoar:2023-05-29T13:08:43Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
LA PRÁCTICA DOCENTE EN EL AREA DE HISTORIA EN TIEMPOS DE PANDEMIA : PERCEPCIONES DE LOS LICENCIANDOS
Prática de Docência em História em tempos de pandemia: percepções de licenciandos/as
title TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
spellingShingle TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto
formação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência.
teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice.
formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docente
title_short TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
title_full TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
title_fullStr TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
title_full_unstemmed TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
title_sort TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
author Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto
author_facet Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto
Urban, Ana Cláudia
author_role author
author2 Urban, Ana Cláudia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto
Urban, Ana Cláudia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv formação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência.
teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice.
formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docente
topic formação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência.
teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice.
formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docente
description The objective of this article is to reflect on the teaching of History from the experience carried out with academics of the Undergraduate Course in History / UFPR during the development of the Teaching Practice course in the academic year of 2020. As a part of the activities of that course, monitoring of remote classes was offered by the State Department of Education of Paraná (SEED-PR) as well as the systematization of records through the field diary. For the reflections of this article, we will approach the observations made by the licensors themselves about remote classes focused on the Final Years of Elementary School and for High School. From this material, here understood as a source, we intend to discuss the graduates' perceptions about the teaching-learning process, considering the methodological debate present in the classes that were observed. As a result, we point out the presence of the quantity x quality dilemma (deepening, problematization) of content; the way of mediating academic knowledge and historical school knowledge and the mnemonic characteristic of the activities proposed in remote classes, to the detriment of problematizations that consider licensors' arguments when relating to historical knowledge. For the analysis of these questions, we used as a reference the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field, those of the field of Historical Education with Jörn Rüsen, to reflect on the formation of historical consciousness and those of Ana Zavala, to think the teaching practice and the meaning of these observations in the initial formation of History teachers.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29529
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29530
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Educação em Revista
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Educação em Revista
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista ; v. 37 n. 1 (2021): Vol. 37 (2021)
1982-6621
0102-4698
reponame:Educação em Revista
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Educação em Revista
collection Educação em Revista
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br
_version_ 1799711123054788608