TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Educação em Revista |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626 |
Resumo: | The objective of this article is to reflect on the teaching of History from the experience carried out with academics of the Undergraduate Course in History / UFPR during the development of the Teaching Practice course in the academic year of 2020. As a part of the activities of that course, monitoring of remote classes was offered by the State Department of Education of Paraná (SEED-PR) as well as the systematization of records through the field diary. For the reflections of this article, we will approach the observations made by the licensors themselves about remote classes focused on the Final Years of Elementary School and for High School. From this material, here understood as a source, we intend to discuss the graduates' perceptions about the teaching-learning process, considering the methodological debate present in the classes that were observed. As a result, we point out the presence of the quantity x quality dilemma (deepening, problematization) of content; the way of mediating academic knowledge and historical school knowledge and the mnemonic characteristic of the activities proposed in remote classes, to the detriment of problematizations that consider licensors' arguments when relating to historical knowledge. For the analysis of these questions, we used as a reference the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field, those of the field of Historical Education with Jörn Rüsen, to reflect on the formation of historical consciousness and those of Ana Zavala, to think the teaching practice and the meaning of these observations in the initial formation of History teachers. |
id |
UFMG-5_2198ae6d4c625019ccbb44aed556c58c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/32626 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-5 |
network_name_str |
Educação em Revista |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS LA PRÁCTICA DOCENTE EN EL AREA DE HISTORIA EN TIEMPOS DE PANDEMIA : PERCEPCIONES DE LOS LICENCIANDOS Prática de Docência em História em tempos de pandemia: percepções de licenciandos/asformação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência.teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice.formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docenteThe objective of this article is to reflect on the teaching of History from the experience carried out with academics of the Undergraduate Course in History / UFPR during the development of the Teaching Practice course in the academic year of 2020. As a part of the activities of that course, monitoring of remote classes was offered by the State Department of Education of Paraná (SEED-PR) as well as the systematization of records through the field diary. For the reflections of this article, we will approach the observations made by the licensors themselves about remote classes focused on the Final Years of Elementary School and for High School. From this material, here understood as a source, we intend to discuss the graduates' perceptions about the teaching-learning process, considering the methodological debate present in the classes that were observed. As a result, we point out the presence of the quantity x quality dilemma (deepening, problematization) of content; the way of mediating academic knowledge and historical school knowledge and the mnemonic characteristic of the activities proposed in remote classes, to the detriment of problematizations that consider licensors' arguments when relating to historical knowledge. For the analysis of these questions, we used as a reference the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field, those of the field of Historical Education with Jörn Rüsen, to reflect on the formation of historical consciousness and those of Ana Zavala, to think the teaching practice and the meaning of these observations in the initial formation of History teachers.El objetivo de este artículo es reflexionar sobre la docencia de la História a partir de la experiencia realizada con académicos de la Licenciatura en Historia / UFPR durante el desarrollo de la disciplina Práctica Docente en el año académico 2020. Formaba parte de las actividades de esa disciplina la asistencia a las clases remotas que ofrece la Secretaría de Educación del Estado de Paraná (SEED-PR) y la sistematización de registros a través del diario de campo. Para las reflexiones de este artículo, nos acercaremos a las observaciones realizadas por los propios licenciandos sobre las clases remotas enfocadas a los últimos años de la educación secundária y Bachillerato. A partir de este material, asumido aquí como fuente, pretendemos discutir las percepciones de los licenciados sobre la relación enseñanza-aprendizaje, considerando el debate metodológico presente en las clases asistidas. Como resultado, señalamos la presencia del dilema cantidad x calidad (profundización, problematización) de los contenidos; la forma de mediar el conocimiento académico y el conocimiento histórico escolar y la característica mnemotécnica de las actividades propuestas en las clases remotas, en detrimento de las problematizaciones que consideran los argumentos de los licenciandos al relacionarse con el conocimiento histórico. Para el análisis de estas cuestiones utilizamos como referencia los aportes de Pierre Bourdieu, especialmente los conceptos de habitus y campo, los del campo de la Educación Histórica con Jörn Rüsen, para reflexionar sobre la formación de la conciencia histórica y los de Ana Zavala, pensar la práctica docente y el significado de estas observaciones en la formación inicial de los profesores de Historia.O objetivo deste artigo é refletirmos sobre o ensino de História a partir da experiência realizada junto a estudantes do curso de Graduação em História/UFPR durante o desenvolvimento da disciplina Prática de Docência no ano letivo de 2020. Como parte das atividades da referida disciplina estava o acompanhamento de aulas remotas ofertadas pela Secretaria de Estado da Educação do Paraná (SEED-PR) e a sistematização de registros por meio do diário de campo. Para as reflexões deste artigo abordaremos as observações feitas pelos/as próprios licenciandos/as acerca de aulas remotas voltadas para os Anos Finais do Ensino Fundamental e para o Ensino Médio. A partir desse material, aqui assumido como fonte, pretendemos discutir as percepções dos/as licenciados/as sobre a relação ensino aprendizagem, considerando o debate metodológico presente nas aulas acompanhadas. Como resultado apontamos a presença do dilema quantidade x qualidade (aprofundamento, problematização) de conteúdo; a forma de mediar o conhecimento acadêmico e o conhecimento histórico escolar e a característica mnemônica das atividades propostas nas aulas remotas, em detrimento de problematizações que consideram a argumentação dos alunos ao se relacionarem com o conhecimento histórico. Para a análise destas questões utilizamos como referência as contribuições de Pierre Bourdieu, em especial os conceitos de habitus e de campo, as do campo da Educação Histórica com Jörn Rüsen, para refletir acerca da formação da consciência histórica e as de Ana Zavala, para pensar a prática docente e o sentido destas observações na formação inicial de professores de História.Educação em Revista 2022-01-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626Educação em Revista ; v. 37 n. 1 (2021): Vol. 37 (2021)1982-66210102-4698reponame:Educação em Revistainstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29529https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29530Copyright (c) 2022 Educação em Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Nadia GaiofattoUrban, Ana Cláudia2023-05-29T13:08:43Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/32626Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/oai||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br1982-66210102-4698opendoar:2023-05-29T13:08:43Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS LA PRÁCTICA DOCENTE EN EL AREA DE HISTORIA EN TIEMPOS DE PANDEMIA : PERCEPCIONES DE LOS LICENCIANDOS Prática de Docência em História em tempos de pandemia: percepções de licenciandos/as |
title |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS |
spellingShingle |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto formação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência. teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice. formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docente |
title_short |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS |
title_full |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS |
title_fullStr |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS |
title_full_unstemmed |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS |
title_sort |
TEACHING PRACTICE IN HISTORY IN PANDEMIC TIMES: PERCEPTIONS FROM LICENSORS |
author |
Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto Urban, Ana Cláudia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Urban, Ana Cláudia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Nadia Gaiofatto Urban, Ana Cláudia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
formação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência. teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice. formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docente |
topic |
formação de professores, ensino de História, prática de docência. teacher training, history teaching, teaching practice. formación del profesorado, enseñanza de la historia, práctica docente |
description |
The objective of this article is to reflect on the teaching of History from the experience carried out with academics of the Undergraduate Course in History / UFPR during the development of the Teaching Practice course in the academic year of 2020. As a part of the activities of that course, monitoring of remote classes was offered by the State Department of Education of Paraná (SEED-PR) as well as the systematization of records through the field diary. For the reflections of this article, we will approach the observations made by the licensors themselves about remote classes focused on the Final Years of Elementary School and for High School. From this material, here understood as a source, we intend to discuss the graduates' perceptions about the teaching-learning process, considering the methodological debate present in the classes that were observed. As a result, we point out the presence of the quantity x quality dilemma (deepening, problematization) of content; the way of mediating academic knowledge and historical school knowledge and the mnemonic characteristic of the activities proposed in remote classes, to the detriment of problematizations that consider licensors' arguments when relating to historical knowledge. For the analysis of these questions, we used as a reference the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field, those of the field of Historical Education with Jörn Rüsen, to reflect on the formation of historical consciousness and those of Ana Zavala, to think the teaching practice and the meaning of these observations in the initial formation of History teachers. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29529 https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/32626/29530 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Educação em Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Educação em Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista ; v. 37 n. 1 (2021): Vol. 37 (2021) 1982-6621 0102-4698 reponame:Educação em Revista instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Educação em Revista |
collection |
Educação em Revista |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1799711123054788608 |