PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: FESTA, MEIRE
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pinazza, Mônica Appezzato
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educação em Revista
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321
Resumo: This article refers to some data from exploratory research, which had as its theme the implementation of Participatory Institutional Self-Evaluation, as a public policy for the evaluation of early childhood education in the municipal education system of the city of São Paulo, between 2013 and 2016. The case study involved professionals from 1869 teaching units and sought to analyze the process from the participants' perspective (FESTA, 2019). On this occasion, it is intended to focus on the educators' testimonies obtained in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview, portraying how they, at the time, conceived the issue of co-responsibility in the qualification of the daily practices of their respective institutions, since the perspective of transformation is a fundamental part of institutional self-evaluation (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017). The research evidenced the resistance of professionals, from different institutions and different administrative instances, to assume the position of personal responsibility for the qualification of the service to children and their families (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). It also brought elements that indicated the educators' difficulty in performing a truly critical analysis of their pedagogical practices (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegating to other actors or attributing to external factors the possibility of implementing the proposed and/or necessary changes. In conclusion, the data produced indicated the need, based on self-assessment, to establish relevant common goals, whose execution is an individual responsibility, but also assumed collectively, and that are intentionally articulated to the Political-Pedagogical Project of each institution (FREITAS, 2005 , 2016).
id UFMG-5_679cd72117892dfab58e470c75a55f3f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/39321
network_acronym_str UFMG-5
network_name_str Educação em Revista
repository_id_str
spelling PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORSLA AUTOEVALUACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DE LAS INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN INFANTIL Y LA CORRESPONSABILIDAD DE LOS EDUCADORESA AUTOAVALIAÇÃO INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E A CORRESPONSABILIDADE DOS EDUCADORESautoavaliação institucional participativaavaliaçãoqualidade da educação infantilprática pedagógicaparticipatory institucional sefevaluationparticipatory institucional self-evaluationquality of early childhood educationpedagogical practiceautoevaluaciòn institucional participativaevaluaciòncalidad educaciòn infantilprática pedagógicaThis article refers to some data from exploratory research, which had as its theme the implementation of Participatory Institutional Self-Evaluation, as a public policy for the evaluation of early childhood education in the municipal education system of the city of São Paulo, between 2013 and 2016. The case study involved professionals from 1869 teaching units and sought to analyze the process from the participants' perspective (FESTA, 2019). On this occasion, it is intended to focus on the educators' testimonies obtained in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview, portraying how they, at the time, conceived the issue of co-responsibility in the qualification of the daily practices of their respective institutions, since the perspective of transformation is a fundamental part of institutional self-evaluation (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017). The research evidenced the resistance of professionals, from different institutions and different administrative instances, to assume the position of personal responsibility for the qualification of the service to children and their families (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). It also brought elements that indicated the educators' difficulty in performing a truly critical analysis of their pedagogical practices (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegating to other actors or attributing to external factors the possibility of implementing the proposed and/or necessary changes. In conclusion, the data produced indicated the need, based on self-assessment, to establish relevant common goals, whose execution is an individual responsibility, but also assumed collectively, and that are intentionally articulated to the Political-Pedagogical Project of each institution (FREITAS, 2005 , 2016).Este artículo hace referencia a algunos datos de una investigación exploratoria, que tuvo como tema la implementación de la Autoevaluación Institucional Participativa (AIP), como política pública para la evaluación de la educación inicial en la Red Municipal de Educación de la ciudad de São Paulo (2013).- 2016). El estudio de caso involucró a profesionales de 1869 unidades educativas y buscó analizar el proceso AIP desde la perspectiva de los participantes (FESTA, 2019). En esta oportunidad, las declaraciones de los educadores se centraron en el cuestionario y la entrevista semiestructurada, retratando cómo se concibió el tema de la corresponsabilidad en la calificación de las acciones cotidianas de sus respectivas instituciones, ya que la perspectiva de transformación constituye un fundamento. parte de la AIP (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017). La investigación demostró la resistencia de los profesionales, de diversas instituciones y diferentes órganos administrativos, a asumir la posición de responsabilidad personal para la calificación del cuidado de los niños y las familias (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). También trajo elementos que indicaron la dificultad de los educadores para realizar un análisis verdaderamente crítico de sus prácticas pedagógicas (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegando en otros actores o atribuyendo a factores externos la posibilidad de realizar transformaciones concretas. .considerado necesario. En conclusión, los datos producidos indicaron la necesidad, desde la AIP, de establecer metas comunes relevantes, cuya ejecución es una responsabilidad individual, pero también asumida colectivamente, y que se articulan intencionalmente al Proyecto Político-Pedagógico de las instituciones (FREITAS, 2005, 2016).Este artigo refere-se a alguns dos dados de uma pesquisa de caráter exploratório, que teve como tema a implementação de Autoavaliação Institucional Participativa (AIP), como política pública de avaliação da educação infantil da Rede Municipal de Ensino da cidade de São Paulo, entre 2013 e 2016. O estudo de caso envolveu profissionais de 1869 unidades educacionais e buscou analisar o processo da AIP sob a ótica dos participantes (FESTA, 2019). Nesta oportunidade, pretende-se focalizar os depoimentos dos educadores a questionário e a entrevista semiestruturada, retratando como eles, à época, concebiam a questão da corresponsabilidade na qualificação das ações cotidianas de suas respectivas instituições, visto que a perspectiva de transformação se constitui parte fundante da AIP (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA,2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO,2017). A pesquisa demonstrou a resistência dos profissionais, de várias instituições e de diferentes instâncias administrativas, em assumir a posição de responsabilização pessoal pela qualificação do atendimento às crianças e às famílias (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). Trouxe, ainda, elementos que indicaram a dificuldade dos educadores em realizar uma análise verdadeiramente crítica de suas práticas pedagógicas (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegando a outros atores ou atribuindo a fatores externos a possibilidade de realizar as transformações concretas julgadas necessárias. Em conclusão, os dados produzidos indicaram a necessidade de, a partir da AIP, estabelecer metas comuns pertinentes, cuja execução seja de responsabilidade individual, mas também coletivamente assumidas, e que estejam intencionalmente articuladas ao Projeto Político-Pedagógico de cada instituição (FREITAS, 2005,2016).Educação em Revista 2023-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextotextotextoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321Educação em Revista ; v. 39 (2023)1982-66210102-4698reponame:Educação em Revistainstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321/37442https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321/37443Copyright (c) 2023 Educação em Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFESTA, MEIREPinazza, Mônica Appezzato 2023-09-28T15:34:29Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/39321Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/oai||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br1982-66210102-4698opendoar:2023-09-28T15:34:29Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
LA AUTOEVALUACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DE LAS INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN INFANTIL Y LA CORRESPONSABILIDAD DE LOS EDUCADORES
A AUTOAVALIAÇÃO INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E A CORRESPONSABILIDADE DOS EDUCADORES
title PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
spellingShingle PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
FESTA, MEIRE
autoavaliação institucional participativa
avaliação
qualidade da educação infantil
prática pedagógica
participatory institucional sefevaluation
participatory institucional self-evaluation
quality of early childhood education
pedagogical practice
autoevaluaciòn institucional participativa
evaluaciòn
calidad educaciòn infantil
prática pedagógica
title_short PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_full PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_fullStr PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_full_unstemmed PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_sort PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
author FESTA, MEIRE
author_facet FESTA, MEIRE
Pinazza, Mônica Appezzato
author_role author
author2 Pinazza, Mônica Appezzato
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv FESTA, MEIRE
Pinazza, Mônica Appezzato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv autoavaliação institucional participativa
avaliação
qualidade da educação infantil
prática pedagógica
participatory institucional sefevaluation
participatory institucional self-evaluation
quality of early childhood education
pedagogical practice
autoevaluaciòn institucional participativa
evaluaciòn
calidad educaciòn infantil
prática pedagógica
topic autoavaliação institucional participativa
avaliação
qualidade da educação infantil
prática pedagógica
participatory institucional sefevaluation
participatory institucional self-evaluation
quality of early childhood education
pedagogical practice
autoevaluaciòn institucional participativa
evaluaciòn
calidad educaciòn infantil
prática pedagógica
description This article refers to some data from exploratory research, which had as its theme the implementation of Participatory Institutional Self-Evaluation, as a public policy for the evaluation of early childhood education in the municipal education system of the city of São Paulo, between 2013 and 2016. The case study involved professionals from 1869 teaching units and sought to analyze the process from the participants' perspective (FESTA, 2019). On this occasion, it is intended to focus on the educators' testimonies obtained in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview, portraying how they, at the time, conceived the issue of co-responsibility in the qualification of the daily practices of their respective institutions, since the perspective of transformation is a fundamental part of institutional self-evaluation (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017). The research evidenced the resistance of professionals, from different institutions and different administrative instances, to assume the position of personal responsibility for the qualification of the service to children and their families (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). It also brought elements that indicated the educators' difficulty in performing a truly critical analysis of their pedagogical practices (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegating to other actors or attributing to external factors the possibility of implementing the proposed and/or necessary changes. In conclusion, the data produced indicated the need, based on self-assessment, to establish relevant common goals, whose execution is an individual responsibility, but also assumed collectively, and that are intentionally articulated to the Political-Pedagogical Project of each institution (FREITAS, 2005 , 2016).
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
texto
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321/37442
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/39321/37443
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Educação em Revista
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Educação em Revista
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista ; v. 39 (2023)
1982-6621
0102-4698
reponame:Educação em Revista
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Educação em Revista
collection Educação em Revista
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br
_version_ 1799711124347682816