PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Festa, Meire
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pinazza, Mônica Apezzatto
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3634
Resumo: ABSTRACT: This article refers to some data from exploratory research, which had as its theme the implementation of Participatory Institutional Self-Evaluation, as a public policy for the evaluation of early childhood education in the municipal education system of the city of São Paulo, between 2013 and 2016. The case study involved professionals from 1869 teaching units and sought to analyze the process from the participants' perspective (FESTA, 2019). On this occasion, it is intended to focus on the educators' testimonies obtained in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview, portraying how they, at the time, conceived the issue of co-responsibility in the qualification of the daily practices of their respective institutions, since the perspective of transformation is a fundamental part of institutional self-evaluation (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017).  The research evidenced the resistance of professionals, from different institutions and different administrative instances, to assume the position of personal responsibility for the qualification of the service to children and their families (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). It also brought elements that indicated the educators' difficulty in performing a truly critical analysis of their pedagogical practices (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegating to other actors or attributing to external factors the possibility of implementing the proposed and/or necessary changes. In conclusion, the data produced indicated the need, based on self-assessment, to establish relevant common goals, whose execution is an individual responsibility, but also assumed collectively, and that are intentionally articulated to the Political-Pedagogical Project of each institution (FREITAS, 2005 , 2016).
id SCI-1_edd3533923c34045cd1425d279e2de75
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3634
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORSLA AUTOEVALUACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DE LAS INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN INFANTIL Y LA CORRESPONSABILIDAD DE LOS EDUCADORES A AUTOAVALIAÇÃO INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E A CORRESPONSABILIDADE DOS EDUCADORESAutoavaliação Institucional ParticipativaAvaliaçãoQualidade da educação infantilPrática pedagógicaParticipatory institutional self-evaluationevaluationquality of early childhood educationpedagogical practiceAutoevaluación institucional participativaevaluacióncalidad de la educación infantilpráctica pedagógicaABSTRACT: This article refers to some data from exploratory research, which had as its theme the implementation of Participatory Institutional Self-Evaluation, as a public policy for the evaluation of early childhood education in the municipal education system of the city of São Paulo, between 2013 and 2016. The case study involved professionals from 1869 teaching units and sought to analyze the process from the participants' perspective (FESTA, 2019). On this occasion, it is intended to focus on the educators' testimonies obtained in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview, portraying how they, at the time, conceived the issue of co-responsibility in the qualification of the daily practices of their respective institutions, since the perspective of transformation is a fundamental part of institutional self-evaluation (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017).  The research evidenced the resistance of professionals, from different institutions and different administrative instances, to assume the position of personal responsibility for the qualification of the service to children and their families (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). It also brought elements that indicated the educators' difficulty in performing a truly critical analysis of their pedagogical practices (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegating to other actors or attributing to external factors the possibility of implementing the proposed and/or necessary changes. In conclusion, the data produced indicated the need, based on self-assessment, to establish relevant common goals, whose execution is an individual responsibility, but also assumed collectively, and that are intentionally articulated to the Political-Pedagogical Project of each institution (FREITAS, 2005 , 2016).Este artículo se refiere a algunos datos de una investigación de carácter exploratorio, que tuvo como tema la implementación de la Autoevaluación Institucional Participativa (AIP), como política pública de evaluación de la educación infantil en la Red Municipal de Educación de la ciudad de São Paulo, entre 2013 y 2016. En el estudio de casos participaron profesionales de 1869 unidades educativas y se buscó analizar el proceso de AIP desde la perspectiva de los participantes (FESTA, 2019). En esta oportunidad, se pretende centrar la atención en las declaraciones de los educadores al cuestionario y a la entrevista semiestructurada, retratando cómo ellos concibieron el tema de la corresponsabilidad en la cualificación de las acciones cotidianas de sus respectivas instituciones, ya que la perspectiva de transformación constituye una parte fundante del AIP (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA,2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO,2017). La investigación mostró la resistencia de los profesionales de diversas instituciones y de diferentes instancias administrativas, a asumir la posición de responsabilidad personal por la calificación del servicio a los niños y las familias (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). También aportó elementos que indicaban la dificultad de los educadores para realizar un análisis verdaderamente crítico de sus prácticas pedagógicas (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegando en otros actores o atribuyendo a factores externos la posibilidad de realizar las transformaciones concretas que se consideran necesarias. En conclusión, los datos producidos indicaron la necesidad, a partir del AIP, de establecer metas comunes relevantes, cuya implementación sea responsabilidad de los individuos, pero también asumida colectivamente, y que se articulen intencionalmente al Proyecto Político-Pedagógico de cada institución (FREITAS, 2005,2016).Este artigo refere-se a alguns dos dados de uma pesquisa de caráter exploratório, que teve como tema a implementação de Autoavaliação Institucional Participativa (AIP), como política pública de avaliação da educação infantil da Rede Municipal de Ensino da cidade de São Paulo, entre 2013 e 2016. O estudo de caso envolveu profissionais de 1869 unidades educacionais e buscou analisar o processo da AIP sob a ótica dos participantes (FESTA, 2019). Nesta oportunidade, pretende-se focalizar os depoimentos dos educadores a questionário e a entrevista semiestruturada, retratando como eles, à época, concebiam a questão da corresponsabilidade na qualificação das ações cotidianas de suas respectivas instituições, visto que a perspectiva de transformação se constitui parte fundante da AIP (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA,2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO,2017). A pesquisa demonstrou a resistência dos profissionais, de várias instituições e de diferentes instâncias administrativas, em assumir a posição de responsabilização pessoal pela qualificação do atendimento às crianças e às famílias (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). Trouxe, ainda, elementos que indicaram a dificuldade dos educadores em realizar uma análise verdadeiramente crítica de suas práticas pedagógicas (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegando a outros atores ou atribuindo a fatores externos a possibilidade de realizar as transformações concretas julgadas necessárias. Em conclusão, os dados produzidos indicaram a necessidade de, a partir da AIP, estabelecer metas comuns pertinentes, cuja execução seja de responsabilidade individual, mas também coletivamente assumidas, e que estejam intencionalmente articuladas ao Projeto Político-Pedagógico de cada instituição (FREITAS, 2005,2016).SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/363410.1590/SciELOPreprints.3634porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3634/6900Copyright (c) 2022 Meire Festa, Mônica Apezzatto Pinazzahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFesta, MeirePinazza, Mônica Apezzattoreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-02-16T16:12:02Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3634Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-02-16T16:12:02SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
LA AUTOEVALUACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DE LAS INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN INFANTIL Y LA CORRESPONSABILIDAD DE LOS EDUCADORES
A AUTOAVALIAÇÃO INSTITUCIONAL PARTICIPATIVA DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E A CORRESPONSABILIDADE DOS EDUCADORES
title PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
spellingShingle PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
Festa, Meire
Autoavaliação Institucional Participativa
Avaliação
Qualidade da educação infantil
Prática pedagógica
Participatory institutional self-evaluation
evaluation
quality of early childhood education
pedagogical practice
Autoevaluación institucional participativa
evaluación
calidad de la educación infantil
práctica pedagógica
title_short PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_full PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_fullStr PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_full_unstemmed PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
title_sort PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE CO-RESPONSIBILITY OF EDUCATORS
author Festa, Meire
author_facet Festa, Meire
Pinazza, Mônica Apezzatto
author_role author
author2 Pinazza, Mônica Apezzatto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Festa, Meire
Pinazza, Mônica Apezzatto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Autoavaliação Institucional Participativa
Avaliação
Qualidade da educação infantil
Prática pedagógica
Participatory institutional self-evaluation
evaluation
quality of early childhood education
pedagogical practice
Autoevaluación institucional participativa
evaluación
calidad de la educación infantil
práctica pedagógica
topic Autoavaliação Institucional Participativa
Avaliação
Qualidade da educação infantil
Prática pedagógica
Participatory institutional self-evaluation
evaluation
quality of early childhood education
pedagogical practice
Autoevaluación institucional participativa
evaluación
calidad de la educación infantil
práctica pedagógica
description ABSTRACT: This article refers to some data from exploratory research, which had as its theme the implementation of Participatory Institutional Self-Evaluation, as a public policy for the evaluation of early childhood education in the municipal education system of the city of São Paulo, between 2013 and 2016. The case study involved professionals from 1869 teaching units and sought to analyze the process from the participants' perspective (FESTA, 2019). On this occasion, it is intended to focus on the educators' testimonies obtained in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview, portraying how they, at the time, conceived the issue of co-responsibility in the qualification of the daily practices of their respective institutions, since the perspective of transformation is a fundamental part of institutional self-evaluation (SORDI, 2010; SORDI; SOUZA, 2012; FREITAS, 2016; MORO, 2017).  The research evidenced the resistance of professionals, from different institutions and different administrative instances, to assume the position of personal responsibility for the qualification of the service to children and their families (CAMPOS; RIBEIRO, 2016, 2017). It also brought elements that indicated the educators' difficulty in performing a truly critical analysis of their pedagogical practices (OLIVEIRA-FORMOSINHO, KISHIMOTO 2002; FREIRE, 1996), delegating to other actors or attributing to external factors the possibility of implementing the proposed and/or necessary changes. In conclusion, the data produced indicated the need, based on self-assessment, to establish relevant common goals, whose execution is an individual responsibility, but also assumed collectively, and that are intentionally articulated to the Political-Pedagogical Project of each institution (FREITAS, 2005 , 2016).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3634
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3634
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3634
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3634
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3634/6900
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Meire Festa, Mônica Apezzatto Pinazza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Meire Festa, Mônica Apezzatto Pinazza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047827258408960