Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mariano,R.S.G.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Uscategu,R.A.R., Nociti,R.P., Barros,F.F.P.C., Santos,V.J.C., Coutinho,L.N., Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C., Silva,P.D.A., Teixeira,P.P.M., Vicente,W.R. R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848
Resumo: ABSTRACT The present study had as an aim to evaluate a right lateral access as an alternative method to laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in sheep. Twenty-four Santa Ines ewes were randomly assigned in two groups with twelve animals each: RLD - positioned in right lateral decubitus, with 10º head-down tilt; and DD - positioned in dorsal decubitus with 35º head-down tilt. The following parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes during the procedure: total surgical time (ST), visualized follicles (VF), aspirated follicles (AF), recovered oocytes (RO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and end tidal CO2 pressure (EtCO2). Pre and postoperative arterial hemogasometry parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, CHCO3 and BE) were also evaluated; and serum fibrinogen levels (SFL) on postoperative period. The values of VF, AF, RO, fR, PaO2, pH, CHCO3, BE and SFL were similar between groups, although ST, HR, MAP, EtCO2 and PaCO2 were higher in LG. Regarding operative periods, PaO2 and pH were lower after surgery (PaO2: 79.1±16.4; 79.2±11.7mmHg; pH: 7.30±0.09; 7.32±0.08) in both groups when compared to preoperative (PaO2: 80.1±14.3; 83.4±10.5 mmHg; pH: 7.38±0.05; 7.39±0.05) while PaCO2 (43.6±4.6; 41.9±5.4mmHg) and CHCO3 (22.8±1.5; 22.7±3.0mmol/L) increased (PaCO2: 54.3±10.9; 46.9±6.3mmHg; CHCO3: 24.8±3.4; 24.4±2.7mmol/L) postoperative. This alternative decubitus presented is a viable procedure and did not differ in oocyte recovery rates in ewes. However, entails cardiorespiratory major alterations compared to conventional procedure, making its practical applicability limited.
id UFMG-8_86e8dced8e7f6a3495da29084c6f568b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-09352019000300848
network_acronym_str UFMG-8
network_name_str Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in EwesovinesurgerybiotechnologygenitourinaryABSTRACT The present study had as an aim to evaluate a right lateral access as an alternative method to laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in sheep. Twenty-four Santa Ines ewes were randomly assigned in two groups with twelve animals each: RLD - positioned in right lateral decubitus, with 10º head-down tilt; and DD - positioned in dorsal decubitus with 35º head-down tilt. The following parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes during the procedure: total surgical time (ST), visualized follicles (VF), aspirated follicles (AF), recovered oocytes (RO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and end tidal CO2 pressure (EtCO2). Pre and postoperative arterial hemogasometry parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, CHCO3 and BE) were also evaluated; and serum fibrinogen levels (SFL) on postoperative period. The values of VF, AF, RO, fR, PaO2, pH, CHCO3, BE and SFL were similar between groups, although ST, HR, MAP, EtCO2 and PaCO2 were higher in LG. Regarding operative periods, PaO2 and pH were lower after surgery (PaO2: 79.1±16.4; 79.2±11.7mmHg; pH: 7.30±0.09; 7.32±0.08) in both groups when compared to preoperative (PaO2: 80.1±14.3; 83.4±10.5 mmHg; pH: 7.38±0.05; 7.39±0.05) while PaCO2 (43.6±4.6; 41.9±5.4mmHg) and CHCO3 (22.8±1.5; 22.7±3.0mmol/L) increased (PaCO2: 54.3±10.9; 46.9±6.3mmHg; CHCO3: 24.8±3.4; 24.4±2.7mmol/L) postoperative. This alternative decubitus presented is a viable procedure and did not differ in oocyte recovery rates in ewes. However, entails cardiorespiratory major alterations compared to conventional procedure, making its practical applicability limited.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.71 n.3 2019reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG10.1590/1678-4162-10336info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMariano,R.S.G.Uscategu,R.A.R.Nociti,R.P.Barros,F.F.P.C.Santos,V.J.C.Coutinho,L.N.Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C.Silva,P.D.A.Teixeira,P.P.M.Vicente,W.R. R.eng2019-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-09352019000300848Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpjournal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br1678-41620102-0935opendoar:2019-07-02T00:00Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
title Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
spellingShingle Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
Mariano,R.S.G.
ovine
surgery
biotechnology
genitourinary
title_short Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
title_full Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
title_fullStr Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
title_sort Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
author Mariano,R.S.G.
author_facet Mariano,R.S.G.
Uscategu,R.A.R.
Nociti,R.P.
Barros,F.F.P.C.
Santos,V.J.C.
Coutinho,L.N.
Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C.
Silva,P.D.A.
Teixeira,P.P.M.
Vicente,W.R. R.
author_role author
author2 Uscategu,R.A.R.
Nociti,R.P.
Barros,F.F.P.C.
Santos,V.J.C.
Coutinho,L.N.
Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C.
Silva,P.D.A.
Teixeira,P.P.M.
Vicente,W.R. R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mariano,R.S.G.
Uscategu,R.A.R.
Nociti,R.P.
Barros,F.F.P.C.
Santos,V.J.C.
Coutinho,L.N.
Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C.
Silva,P.D.A.
Teixeira,P.P.M.
Vicente,W.R. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ovine
surgery
biotechnology
genitourinary
topic ovine
surgery
biotechnology
genitourinary
description ABSTRACT The present study had as an aim to evaluate a right lateral access as an alternative method to laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in sheep. Twenty-four Santa Ines ewes were randomly assigned in two groups with twelve animals each: RLD - positioned in right lateral decubitus, with 10º head-down tilt; and DD - positioned in dorsal decubitus with 35º head-down tilt. The following parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes during the procedure: total surgical time (ST), visualized follicles (VF), aspirated follicles (AF), recovered oocytes (RO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and end tidal CO2 pressure (EtCO2). Pre and postoperative arterial hemogasometry parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, CHCO3 and BE) were also evaluated; and serum fibrinogen levels (SFL) on postoperative period. The values of VF, AF, RO, fR, PaO2, pH, CHCO3, BE and SFL were similar between groups, although ST, HR, MAP, EtCO2 and PaCO2 were higher in LG. Regarding operative periods, PaO2 and pH were lower after surgery (PaO2: 79.1±16.4; 79.2±11.7mmHg; pH: 7.30±0.09; 7.32±0.08) in both groups when compared to preoperative (PaO2: 80.1±14.3; 83.4±10.5 mmHg; pH: 7.38±0.05; 7.39±0.05) while PaCO2 (43.6±4.6; 41.9±5.4mmHg) and CHCO3 (22.8±1.5; 22.7±3.0mmol/L) increased (PaCO2: 54.3±10.9; 46.9±6.3mmHg; CHCO3: 24.8±3.4; 24.4±2.7mmol/L) postoperative. This alternative decubitus presented is a viable procedure and did not differ in oocyte recovery rates in ewes. However, entails cardiorespiratory major alterations compared to conventional procedure, making its practical applicability limited.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4162-10336
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.71 n.3 2019
reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
collection Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br
_version_ 1750220892930048000