Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The present study had as an aim to evaluate a right lateral access as an alternative method to laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in sheep. Twenty-four Santa Ines ewes were randomly assigned in two groups with twelve animals each: RLD - positioned in right lateral decubitus, with 10º head-down tilt; and DD - positioned in dorsal decubitus with 35º head-down tilt. The following parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes during the procedure: total surgical time (ST), visualized follicles (VF), aspirated follicles (AF), recovered oocytes (RO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and end tidal CO2 pressure (EtCO2). Pre and postoperative arterial hemogasometry parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, CHCO3 and BE) were also evaluated; and serum fibrinogen levels (SFL) on postoperative period. The values of VF, AF, RO, fR, PaO2, pH, CHCO3, BE and SFL were similar between groups, although ST, HR, MAP, EtCO2 and PaCO2 were higher in LG. Regarding operative periods, PaO2 and pH were lower after surgery (PaO2: 79.1±16.4; 79.2±11.7mmHg; pH: 7.30±0.09; 7.32±0.08) in both groups when compared to preoperative (PaO2: 80.1±14.3; 83.4±10.5 mmHg; pH: 7.38±0.05; 7.39±0.05) while PaCO2 (43.6±4.6; 41.9±5.4mmHg) and CHCO3 (22.8±1.5; 22.7±3.0mmol/L) increased (PaCO2: 54.3±10.9; 46.9±6.3mmHg; CHCO3: 24.8±3.4; 24.4±2.7mmol/L) postoperative. This alternative decubitus presented is a viable procedure and did not differ in oocyte recovery rates in ewes. However, entails cardiorespiratory major alterations compared to conventional procedure, making its practical applicability limited. |
id |
UFMG-8_86e8dced8e7f6a3495da29084c6f568b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-09352019000300848 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-8 |
network_name_str |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in EwesovinesurgerybiotechnologygenitourinaryABSTRACT The present study had as an aim to evaluate a right lateral access as an alternative method to laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in sheep. Twenty-four Santa Ines ewes were randomly assigned in two groups with twelve animals each: RLD - positioned in right lateral decubitus, with 10º head-down tilt; and DD - positioned in dorsal decubitus with 35º head-down tilt. The following parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes during the procedure: total surgical time (ST), visualized follicles (VF), aspirated follicles (AF), recovered oocytes (RO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and end tidal CO2 pressure (EtCO2). Pre and postoperative arterial hemogasometry parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, CHCO3 and BE) were also evaluated; and serum fibrinogen levels (SFL) on postoperative period. The values of VF, AF, RO, fR, PaO2, pH, CHCO3, BE and SFL were similar between groups, although ST, HR, MAP, EtCO2 and PaCO2 were higher in LG. Regarding operative periods, PaO2 and pH were lower after surgery (PaO2: 79.1±16.4; 79.2±11.7mmHg; pH: 7.30±0.09; 7.32±0.08) in both groups when compared to preoperative (PaO2: 80.1±14.3; 83.4±10.5 mmHg; pH: 7.38±0.05; 7.39±0.05) while PaCO2 (43.6±4.6; 41.9±5.4mmHg) and CHCO3 (22.8±1.5; 22.7±3.0mmol/L) increased (PaCO2: 54.3±10.9; 46.9±6.3mmHg; CHCO3: 24.8±3.4; 24.4±2.7mmol/L) postoperative. This alternative decubitus presented is a viable procedure and did not differ in oocyte recovery rates in ewes. However, entails cardiorespiratory major alterations compared to conventional procedure, making its practical applicability limited.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.71 n.3 2019reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG10.1590/1678-4162-10336info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMariano,R.S.G.Uscategu,R.A.R.Nociti,R.P.Barros,F.F.P.C.Santos,V.J.C.Coutinho,L.N.Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C.Silva,P.D.A.Teixeira,P.P.M.Vicente,W.R. R.eng2019-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-09352019000300848Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpjournal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br1678-41620102-0935opendoar:2019-07-02T00:00Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
title |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes Mariano,R.S.G. ovine surgery biotechnology genitourinary |
title_short |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
title_full |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
title_sort |
Comparison of two surgical approaches for Laparoscopic Ovum Pick Up in Ewes |
author |
Mariano,R.S.G. |
author_facet |
Mariano,R.S.G. Uscategu,R.A.R. Nociti,R.P. Barros,F.F.P.C. Santos,V.J.C. Coutinho,L.N. Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C. Silva,P.D.A. Teixeira,P.P.M. Vicente,W.R. R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Uscategu,R.A.R. Nociti,R.P. Barros,F.F.P.C. Santos,V.J.C. Coutinho,L.N. Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C. Silva,P.D.A. Teixeira,P.P.M. Vicente,W.R. R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mariano,R.S.G. Uscategu,R.A.R. Nociti,R.P. Barros,F.F.P.C. Santos,V.J.C. Coutinho,L.N. Padilha-Nakaghi,L.C. Silva,P.D.A. Teixeira,P.P.M. Vicente,W.R. R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ovine surgery biotechnology genitourinary |
topic |
ovine surgery biotechnology genitourinary |
description |
ABSTRACT The present study had as an aim to evaluate a right lateral access as an alternative method to laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in sheep. Twenty-four Santa Ines ewes were randomly assigned in two groups with twelve animals each: RLD - positioned in right lateral decubitus, with 10º head-down tilt; and DD - positioned in dorsal decubitus with 35º head-down tilt. The following parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes during the procedure: total surgical time (ST), visualized follicles (VF), aspirated follicles (AF), recovered oocytes (RO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and end tidal CO2 pressure (EtCO2). Pre and postoperative arterial hemogasometry parameters (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, CHCO3 and BE) were also evaluated; and serum fibrinogen levels (SFL) on postoperative period. The values of VF, AF, RO, fR, PaO2, pH, CHCO3, BE and SFL were similar between groups, although ST, HR, MAP, EtCO2 and PaCO2 were higher in LG. Regarding operative periods, PaO2 and pH were lower after surgery (PaO2: 79.1±16.4; 79.2±11.7mmHg; pH: 7.30±0.09; 7.32±0.08) in both groups when compared to preoperative (PaO2: 80.1±14.3; 83.4±10.5 mmHg; pH: 7.38±0.05; 7.39±0.05) while PaCO2 (43.6±4.6; 41.9±5.4mmHg) and CHCO3 (22.8±1.5; 22.7±3.0mmol/L) increased (PaCO2: 54.3±10.9; 46.9±6.3mmHg; CHCO3: 24.8±3.4; 24.4±2.7mmol/L) postoperative. This alternative decubitus presented is a viable procedure and did not differ in oocyte recovery rates in ewes. However, entails cardiorespiratory major alterations compared to conventional procedure, making its practical applicability limited. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300848 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-4162-10336 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.71 n.3 2019 reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
journal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750220892930048000 |